Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

August 25, 2025, 09:08:54 pm

Author Topic: Physics Unit 4 Exam discussion  (Read 55680 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ngRISING

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 688
Re: Physics Unit 4 Exam discussion
« Reply #240 on: November 12, 2009, 12:15:38 pm »
whats diffraction?
2008: Further Maths & LOTE
2009: English Language, Psychology, Maths Methods, Business Management and Physics
2010: Bachelor of Commerce @ Monash!
2011: Bachelor of Business-Logistics & Supply Chain Management (applied)

Employed by NAB.

NE2000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • living an alternate reality
Re: Physics Unit 4 Exam discussion
« Reply #241 on: November 12, 2009, 02:25:16 pm »
Ah crap is this ok?
I thought it was risky drawing loops cuz technically they did say "lines"

That should be ok. I'm worried about drawing loops lol, I don't think you've got anything to worry about
2009: English, Specialist Math, Mathematical Methods, Chemistry, Physics

scope9

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: Physics Unit 4 Exam discussion
« Reply #242 on: November 12, 2009, 02:51:37 pm »
Ah crap is this ok?
I thought it was risky drawing loops cuz technically they did say "lines"

itute says loops so i suppose loops will be fine!

whats diffraction?

did you even do physics? haha. just kidding
its the bending of light as it passes through a gap. the amount of diffraction depends on the wavelength:gap ratio. or something like that.
08: Biol - 39
09: Spec, Methods, English Language, Physics, Chem

ENTER: >80

metalvalour

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Physics Unit 4 Exam discussion
« Reply #243 on: November 12, 2009, 03:06:47 pm »
Ah crap is this ok?
I thought it was risky drawing loops cuz technically they did say "lines"

did exactly what you did. but itute's one doesnt have the 2 lines (not loops)?! :(

wilfred

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Physics Unit 4 Exam discussion
« Reply #244 on: November 12, 2009, 04:54:31 pm »
can any one help me with this from photonics
question 2
Which one of the following statements best describe the production of light in an incandescent light bulb?
I know its between
C.Acceleration of electron in random thermal collisions
D. Emission of electromagnetic radiation (light) by electrons accelerated by the applied voltage
which one is it? and why is it not the other one?
thanks heaps

mark_alec

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1173
Re: Physics Unit 4 Exam discussion
« Reply #245 on: November 12, 2009, 05:22:00 pm »
It is C. An incandescent light bulb produces light because the tungsten filament is very hot. This means that the electrons are accelerated in 'random' collisions.

For D, that would be an example of synchrotron light, as it is caused by the acceleration of electrons in an electric field.

majo

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Re: Physics Unit 4 Exam discussion
« Reply #246 on: November 12, 2009, 11:59:13 pm »
TrueTears id like to sincerely thankyou for providing us with that cheat sheet. Im pretty sure it has gotten me an A-A+, i cant find any errors. Does anyone know what a B+ and a high A would get me in terms of SS?

i am also curious

high B and a A+/high A

?

ayaz

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 102
Re: Physics Unit 4 Exam discussion
« Reply #247 on: November 13, 2009, 04:08:53 pm »
So I think I might have stuffed up the question on the exam that asks you to calculate W.

I used W = hf "zero"

But instead of using the value of h calculated from the graph I used the accepted value (4.14x10^-15) and ended up with something like 1.3 eV

Do you guys think i'd lose the marks, seeing as it asks you to use the graph? is using f "zero" from the graph enough?

i did what was above but on the working space i also used the graph and estimated that the W is 1.5ev and used this to determine h and i put the answer to h and W NOT inside the BOX where you put the answer in but ON the TOP of the BOX and inside the box i did what redmosez did and put h=4.14E.14evs in the box and 1.3ev in the box....

do you think i could get the marks (3marks)

crappy

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 781
Re: Physics Unit 4 Exam discussion
« Reply #248 on: November 14, 2009, 02:06:19 pm »
So I think I might have stuffed up the question on the exam that asks you to calculate W.

I used W = hf "zero"

But instead of using the value of h calculated from the graph I used the accepted value (4.14x10^-15) and ended up with something like 1.3 eV

Do you guys think i'd lose the marks, seeing as it asks you to use the graph? is using f "zero" from the graph enough?

i did what was above but on the working space i also used the graph and estimated that the W is 1.5ev and used this to determine h and i put the answer to h and W NOT inside the BOX where you put the answer in but ON the TOP of the BOX and inside the box i did what redmosez did and put h=4.14E.14evs in the box and 1.3ev in the box....

do you think i could get the marks (3marks)

you might get the marks, If its asking for the work function then all you had to was read off the graph( the y intercept). I cant really remember but, you didn't really need to work out anything for that question, besides reading the graph.
ElectricalEng@Monash (2nd year)

methodsboy

  • Guest
Re: Physics Unit 4 Exam discussion
« Reply #249 on: November 16, 2009, 10:22:09 pm »
So I think I might have stuffed up the question on the exam that asks you to calculate W.

I used W = hf "zero"

But instead of using the value of h calculated from the graph I used the accepted value (4.14x10^-15) and ended up with something like 1.3 eV

Do you guys think i'd lose the marks, seeing as it asks you to use the graph? is using f "zero" from the graph enough?

i did what was above but on the working space i also used the graph and estimated that the W is 1.5ev and used this to determine h and i put the answer to h and W NOT inside the BOX where you put the answer in but ON the TOP of the BOX and inside the box i did what redmosez did and put h=4.14E.14evs in the box and 1.3ev in the box....

do you think i could get the marks (3marks)
OMG dude get over it! it happened all most a week ago... cease with the futile lamenting