Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 31, 2025, 06:42:15 am

Author Topic: How did you do? Mark Kelly's solutions  (Read 5818 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

philmurray58

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 22
How did you do? Mark Kelly's solutions
« on: November 11, 2009, 06:43:13 pm »
http://www.mckinnonsc.vic.edu.au/vceit/postmortems/2009ita/index.htm

I'll get the ball rolling i got 15. got mauled by the last two questions when i thought i had them as definites.
There was a couple of shocking questions such as 16 hey.
How did everyone else go on the mult choice?

shiftyz

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: How did you do? Mark Kelly's solutions
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2009, 07:02:37 pm »
got 13/20. And hopefully out of the whole exam lost no more than 22 marks. :( Not good enough for my expectations. Especially since i dropped around 14ish on the 2008 exam. LAMEEEE.

Etherlite

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: How did you do? Mark Kelly's solutions
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2009, 07:15:26 pm »
For multiple choice I got 18/20.

Short answer is a bit harder to judge because of subjective/varying answers, but I estimated no greater loss than 8 - 11 marks...I hope.

Edit: Man I gotta say too, it was a dodgy exam. You could have so many different answers for certain questions, and they were worded so ambiguously. Pretty dodgy subject really.
« Last Edit: November 11, 2009, 07:17:18 pm by Etherlite »

Vadnal

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
Re: How did you do? Mark Kelly's solutions
« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2009, 07:41:39 pm »
16/20
Probably dropped about 15-20 marks in short answer.

2009: IT Applications
2010: Chemistry | Literature | Methods (CAS) | Physical Education | Health and Human Development
ATAR required: 86, ATAR aim: 90+

Putzmeister

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: How did you do? Mark Kelly's solutions
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2009, 07:46:49 pm »
I'm quite similar, 14/20 for the Multiple Choice, not sure how I went throughout the rest of the exam as the answers seemed very suggestive and up for interpretation. I'm still hopeful for a 40+ ENTER score, because I kinda need it.

Vadnal

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
Re: How did you do? Mark Kelly's solutions
« Reply #5 on: November 11, 2009, 08:01:34 pm »
Feeling the same as you Putzmeister, I'm sure the majority of us are.
2009: IT Applications
2010: Chemistry | Literature | Methods (CAS) | Physical Education | Health and Human Development
ATAR required: 86, ATAR aim: 90+

ks04

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 98
Re: How did you do? Mark Kelly's solutions
« Reply #6 on: November 11, 2009, 09:33:21 pm »
17/20 in the multichoice.  The Relationship question threw me (i said field to record) along with the Lead/Lag time question (i said lead time) and the disaster recovery question.  Oh well, hopefully i didn't do too badly in the Short answer, still need to go through all that.
2009 - ITA {43}
2010 - Accounting | Methods (CAS) | Physics | Legal Studies| English |

laineytheman

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: How did you do? Mark Kelly's solutions
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2009, 09:48:27 pm »
16/20 on Multiple choice.

ones I got wrong

=The relationship question
The storyboard question
Q19 with the emergency plan
the IPA Act question.

This is coming from someone with a raw average of C+ unit 3 sacs and B unit 4 sacs. Hopefully this ups my sac marks. (I knew a friend similar situation last year with a B and B+ average (both low) A+ exam = sacs of A and A+ and SS of 39. *prays*


crappy

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 781
Re: How did you do? Mark Kelly's solutions
« Reply #8 on: November 11, 2009, 10:08:14 pm »
HEHEHE lost about 25-28 marks all up, if that makes anyone feel better. Its my 6th subject so Im wondering what my SS will be-

GA1- I averaged 62%
GA2- miraculously averaged 82%
GA3- I roughly got 64/90

Is that enough to get a 30/31, or maybe even higher. Sorry to hijack the thread btw.
ElectricalEng@Monash (2nd year)

kriptik

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 130
Re: How did you do? Mark Kelly's solutions
« Reply #9 on: November 11, 2009, 10:12:25 pm »
well i got 20/20 for the multiple so thats good news :)
2009
-It applications [46]
2010
English [28]   Methods (CAS) [43]   Further maths [50]
Physics [41]   Chemistry        [38]
ATAR: 94.35

2011

methodsboy

  • Guest
Re: How did you do? Mark Kelly's solutions
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2009, 10:19:57 pm »
*sigh* got 17...sucks...though i really think that answer to 5 is C(structure chart) and that the last question was "lead" rather than "lag"...
there's still hope for those who think they did bad : Last year Kelly made a few corrections when he did the 08 post mortem

auzi_wayne

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: How did you do? Mark Kelly's solutions
« Reply #11 on: November 11, 2009, 10:27:30 pm »
i got 18/20 for M.C....lost about 12 marks in S.A
« Last Edit: November 11, 2009, 10:29:39 pm by auzi_wayne »

codykm

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: How did you do? Mark Kelly's solutions
« Reply #12 on: November 11, 2009, 10:59:35 pm »
*sigh* got 17...sucks...though i really think that answer to 5 is C(structure chart) and that the last question was "lead" rather than "lag"...
there's still hope for those who think they did bad : Last year Kelly made a few corrections when he did the 08 post mortem
i'm hoping he stuffed up the structure chart and lead time as well haha..

Vadnal

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
Re: How did you do? Mark Kelly's solutions
« Reply #13 on: November 11, 2009, 11:50:41 pm »
Hoping 5 was structure and lag remains ;)
2009: IT Applications
2010: Chemistry | Literature | Methods (CAS) | Physical Education | Health and Human Development
ATAR required: 86, ATAR aim: 90+

codykm

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: How did you do? Mark Kelly's solutions
« Reply #14 on: November 12, 2009, 12:43:57 am »
Hoping 5 was structure and lag remains ;)

ew nooo, structure and lead ;) haha