Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

February 22, 2026, 08:39:35 am

Author Topic: Q5A from 2009 TSSM Chemistry Unit 4  (Read 1343 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Grey

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • Respect: +1
Q5A from 2009 TSSM Chemistry Unit 4
« on: November 11, 2009, 08:13:45 pm »
0
Hey guys can anyone help me with getting the equations from the TSSM 2009 Trial Exam, because what i got was:

Anode: 2Li + S- >>>>> Li2S + e-        (-) electrode
Cathode: 2e- + FeS2 >>>>> Fe + 2S-              (+) electrode

I mean I checked the answers and they didn't even have the sulfur atom in the half-equations....thats kinda weird because it creates the question, where does sulfur come from within the overall equation?

Thanks.

simpak

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3587
  • Respect: +376
Re: Q5A from 2009 TSSM Chemistry Unit 4
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2009, 08:16:40 pm »
0
I got the same equations as you!  DDDDDDD:
2009 ENTER: 99.05
2014: BSci Hons (Microbiology/Immunology) at UoM
2015+: PhD (Immunology) at UoM

Grey

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • Respect: +1
Re: Q5A from 2009 TSSM Chemistry Unit 4
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2009, 08:17:48 pm »
0
haha im pretty ready for chem u reckon tssm 09 was pretty hard? i reckon it was challenging.

simpak

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3587
  • Respect: +376
Re: Q5A from 2009 TSSM Chemistry Unit 4
« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2009, 08:19:45 pm »
0
I just did it about two hours ago, and I thought it was alright.  I didn't find it too bad, but it was very short!
I usually have heaps of trouble finishing in time, but I finished like 20 minutes early.
2009 ENTER: 99.05
2014: BSci Hons (Microbiology/Immunology) at UoM
2015+: PhD (Immunology) at UoM

TheJosh

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 134
  • Respect: +6
Re: Q5A from 2009 TSSM Chemistry Unit 4
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2009, 08:21:36 pm »
0
i think its a molten cell so the Sulfur and lithium are just ions and so in the half equation thats why you dont include sulfur in half

equations
 

Grey

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • Respect: +1
Re: Q5A from 2009 TSSM Chemistry Unit 4
« Reply #5 on: November 11, 2009, 08:22:00 pm »
0
yeah yeah it was short but only got 84% for it >< finished 20mins early i mean i understand every detail on this stuff but u know your stuff and u write these equations which add up to the overall, but it just doesnt work its just wrong!?

Grey

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • Respect: +1
Re: Q5A from 2009 TSSM Chemistry Unit 4
« Reply #6 on: November 11, 2009, 08:23:02 pm »
0
oh so they're just spectator ions? if i include them does that mean im wrong? =S

TheJosh

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 134
  • Respect: +6
Re: Q5A from 2009 TSSM Chemistry Unit 4
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2009, 08:28:28 pm »
0
they probably are spectator ions

I think if you added them in equation as ions they would cancel anyway?

Grey

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • Respect: +1
Re: Q5A from 2009 TSSM Chemistry Unit 4
« Reply #8 on: November 11, 2009, 08:30:11 pm »
0
no no it doesnt work >< someone please help!!

simpak

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3587
  • Respect: +376
Re: Q5A from 2009 TSSM Chemistry Unit 4
« Reply #9 on: November 11, 2009, 08:35:56 pm »
0
Ummmm I put...
2Li + 2S- ---> Li2S + 2e-

FeS2 + 2e- ----> Fe + 2S-

And when you add them, it turns into the real equation.
I don't see how that's wrong at all...
Maybe it is okay to keep the S's.
2009 ENTER: 99.05
2014: BSci Hons (Microbiology/Immunology) at UoM
2015+: PhD (Immunology) at UoM

simpak

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3587
  • Respect: +376
Re: Q5A from 2009 TSSM Chemistry Unit 4
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2009, 08:40:46 pm »
0
Waiiiit a second, I just reread that.
...That's odd.  It doesn't cancel, the first equation is wrong.
2009 ENTER: 99.05
2014: BSci Hons (Microbiology/Immunology) at UoM
2015+: PhD (Immunology) at UoM

Grey

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • Respect: +1
Re: Q5A from 2009 TSSM Chemistry Unit 4
« Reply #11 on: November 11, 2009, 08:55:07 pm »
0
SORRY GUYS
i know my mistake now, if you're having trouble guess what?
the sulfur ion is a negative 2 charge not negative 1 which means that the sulfur ion is just a spectator ion and can be omitted from the main equation, thats all guys thanks for your help [=[=[=[=[=[=

simpak

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3587
  • Respect: +376
Re: Q5A from 2009 TSSM Chemistry Unit 4
« Reply #12 on: November 11, 2009, 08:58:11 pm »
0
Alright, man, I hope that doesn't come up tomorrow though, I'm bound to confuse myself.
2009 ENTER: 99.05
2014: BSci Hons (Microbiology/Immunology) at UoM
2015+: PhD (Immunology) at UoM

TheJosh

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 134
  • Respect: +6
Re: Q5A from 2009 TSSM Chemistry Unit 4
« Reply #13 on: November 11, 2009, 09:13:45 pm »
0
SORRY GUYS
i know my mistake now, if you're having trouble guess what?
the sulfur ion is a negative 2 charge not negative 1 which means that the sulfur ion is just a spectator ion and can be omitted from the main equation, thats all guys thanks for your help [=[=[=[=[=[=

wat i was tryn to say ^^

ScyLLa

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 11
  • Respect: -20
Re: Q5A from 2009 TSSM Chemistry Unit 4
« Reply #14 on: November 11, 2009, 09:46:52 pm »
0
if sulfur is an -2 charge, then how does FeS2 exist?? isnt Fe 2+ charge, and if sulfur is a -2 charge, they cancel out and therefore should be FeS??

i didnt recognise the Fe (4+)

sorry guyz
« Last Edit: November 11, 2009, 09:49:05 pm by ScyLLa »