Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 08, 2025, 02:47:19 pm

Author Topic: TT's Maths Thread  (Read 150714 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Ahmad

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
  • *dreamy sigh*
  • Respect: +15
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #390 on: December 11, 2009, 11:30:01 pm »
0
I haven't heard of UoM providing copies of Mathematica, but they have it installed on many of the computers on campus. So I'm not entirely sure, but I'd be curious to know if you found out. :)
Mandark: Please, oh please, set me up on a date with that golden-haired angel who graces our undeserving school with her infinite beauty!

The collage of ideas. The music of reason. The poetry of thought. The canvas of logic.


Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #391 on: December 12, 2009, 10:38:14 am »
0
I didn't get to mention how one actually does this in practice, which is to use Mathematica or Maple, or some other CAS:

Mathematica:
Input: SeriesCoefficient[x/(1 - x - x^2), {x, 0, n}]
Output: (-(1/2 (1 - Sqrt[5]))^n + (1/2 (1 + Sqrt[5]))^n)/Sqrt[5]

So the key step really is finding the generating function, the rest is routine computer work, which I've done by hand before, but it takes a few minutes for me vs a few microseconds for the computer.  8-)

I've heard some universities provide require a computer math program. Do you need to buy it yourself or do they provide?

Generally universities usually only have a site license. But I hear the Internet does provide Mathematica and other packages. *wink*
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #392 on: December 12, 2009, 03:27:37 pm »
0
Question: Consider 10 people sitting around a circular table. In how many ways can they change seats so that each person has a different neighbour to the right?

This is my attempt using PIE but are there any other ways? Because computing the last sum seems pretty tedious...

We want to find the complement such that each person has the same neighbour.

Start off with 10 people around the table label them

We need to find A total of pairs.







The total number of ways of rearranging the 10 people is

Thus we require
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

zzdfa

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 328
  • Respect: +4
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #393 on: December 12, 2009, 07:45:13 pm »
0
Use a combinatorial argument to prove that

have you tried using this identity on that last sum?

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #394 on: December 12, 2009, 09:24:25 pm »
0
Hey TT, sorry for off topic. How many cheat sheets did you have?

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #395 on: December 12, 2009, 09:30:46 pm »
0
Hey TT, sorry for off topic. How many cheat sheets did you have?
For what? I don't really have any cheat sheets for Maths, but I had a lot of notes for Physics and Chem.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #396 on: December 12, 2009, 09:51:10 pm »
0
Physics

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #397 on: December 12, 2009, 10:05:08 pm »
0
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #398 on: December 12, 2009, 10:08:59 pm »
0
How many did you upload?

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #399 on: December 12, 2009, 10:09:23 pm »
0
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #400 on: December 12, 2009, 10:34:39 pm »
0
Do you have heinemann physics solutions?

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #401 on: December 12, 2009, 10:35:26 pm »
0
Do you have heinemann physics solutions?
I didn't use Heinemann physics hehe
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #402 on: December 12, 2009, 10:46:00 pm »
0
Do you have heinemann physics solutions?
I didn't use Heinemann physics hehe
Oh thanks anyway.

P.S. I found your synchrotron cheat sheet??O.O

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #403 on: December 13, 2009, 03:32:19 am »
0
Use generating functions to show that for each positive integer , the number of partitions of into unequal parts is equal to the number of partitions of into odd parts.

The generated function for the number of unequal parts is

The generated function for the number of odd parts is

So for example if then there are unequal parts:

And the coefficient of in is indeed .

Now the book tells me to ponder why and are the generated function for unequal/odd parts, however no matter how much I think about it, it doesn't become "obvious" to me, can someone explain the thought process of arriving at each of those functions?

Thanks :)

« Last Edit: December 13, 2009, 03:57:11 am by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Ahmad

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
  • *dreamy sigh*
  • Respect: +15
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #404 on: December 13, 2009, 01:25:35 pm »
0
I think it comes from experience, from seeing lots of infinite products you learn to write and think in terms of them, just like one of the best ways to learn to write is by reading! I'll go through a few examples and hopefully that will help. :)

Let's think of what a finite product such as means. Well how do you typically expand out something like this? You select one term from each bracket and multiply them, then sum up all such products! For example if I select from the first bracket, from the second and from the third, then the product will be . To expand it out fully you have to do this 2 x 2 x 2 = 8 times, for each possible selection of one term from each bracket, then add all the possible products.

A slightly trickier example: find . So what possible selections of a term from each bracket are there, so that the product of the two selections is . Well a general term of the first bracket is and a general term of the second is where p and q are non-negative (remember p=0 represents selecting 1 from the first bracket), and so the general product is which we want to equal and so the coefficient of is the number of solutions to .

What about ? Well a general term of the first bracket is and a general term of the second is , so a general term of the product is , and the coefficient of is the number of non-negative solutions to .

Concerning our original problem which is integer partitions, how do we write a partition of 6? Well we can write any such partition as , where is non-negative. For example 6 = 1+1+4, here we'd have and all other . Can you see how this might relate to our previous example? Here we want to write an integer n as , previously we had . So a natural choice here is to consider the infinite product .

Some exercises you might like to think about:
0. Can you appropriately interpret how to expand out to give a proof of the binomial theorem?

1. Let denote the number of non-negative solutions to . Find the generating function for the counting sequence .

2. What is when expanded out? (Hint: think binary).

3. Write
in expanded form (hint: unique factorization of the positive integers), where the 2, 3, 5, etc are the prime numbers. Alter this slightly to show that which is Euler's product for the Riemann Zeta function.

:)
« Last Edit: December 13, 2009, 01:34:50 pm by Ahmad »
Mandark: Please, oh please, set me up on a date with that golden-haired angel who graces our undeserving school with her infinite beauty!

The collage of ideas. The music of reason. The poetry of thought. The canvas of logic.