Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 30, 2026, 10:47:41 pm

Author Topic: TT's Maths Thread  (Read 176533 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #900 on: February 09, 2010, 03:36:43 pm »
0
thanks humph.

Also using the test for divergence on any alternating series, wouldn't the limit would never exist.

eg,

doesn't exist so the series is diverging, but it is actually converging if we use the alternating series test?
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #901 on: February 09, 2010, 03:55:16 pm »
0
thx

also why doesn't this work...

Is the following series absolutely convergent?







Since for

for

So for

Using the comparison test, is not convergent... so what do I do?


You want to show that for sufficiently large - work out when this inequality is first true, then use induction (this is when a calculator or computer comes in handy).

That's still too weak though.

for sufficiently large n the following is true:



So you can compare it to a geometric series with first term and common ratio
« Last Edit: February 09, 2010, 04:07:37 pm by kamil9876 »
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #902 on: February 09, 2010, 04:05:52 pm »
0
So you're saying we can't use the test for divergence on alternating series?



how come stewarts did it on page 712?



oh u deleted ur post lol
« Last Edit: February 09, 2010, 10:03:17 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #903 on: February 09, 2010, 10:18:57 pm »
0
If is a conditionally convergent series and then there is a rearrangement of that has a sum equal to .

Argh, I haven't done a proof in ages, but this one really caught my attention xD

Let be the subsequence of that consists of positive terms and let be the subsequence of that consists of negative terms. Specifically, let:



and likewise for

Lemma: and are both diverging.

The following construction produces the rearangement for the given :

Let be this rearangment. Imagine that it is initially empty, we will now create it by adding in the numbers in order:

Keep adding the first few numbers from until the sum exceeds . Then keep adding the first few numbers from until the cumulutative sum drops below . Then keep repeating this for the next lot of numbers in and ad infinitum.

Now I will leave it for you to prove that such a construction can be done (you will need the lemma) and that the limit of (x_i) is indeed .
« Last Edit: February 09, 2010, 11:17:49 pm by kamil9876 »
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #904 on: February 10, 2010, 12:34:47 pm »
0
Extension question: Prove that if is a rearangement of a convergent series such that for some fixed integer , (ie each term is "shifted" at most places) then the two sums are equal.
« Last Edit: February 10, 2010, 01:24:01 pm by kamil9876 »
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #905 on: February 10, 2010, 03:15:55 pm »
0


diverging or converging?

First I thought integral test would work since is decreasing for and positive. But the integral is not elementary.

Using the divergence test we get the limit as which is inconclusive.

Next, I tried to use the ratio test.



Since both functions are positive for , the modulus signs are redundant.



Which again is inconclusive.

So what do I do...?

EDIT: 6000th post yay!
« Last Edit: February 10, 2010, 04:18:49 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #906 on: February 10, 2010, 04:06:05 pm »
0


Hence either both the harmonic series and the series in question converge, or both diverges. Meaning the series in question diverges.
« Last Edit: February 10, 2010, 04:12:07 pm by kamil9876 »
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #907 on: February 10, 2010, 04:17:52 pm »
0
thanx
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #908 on: February 10, 2010, 04:58:41 pm »
0


Using the root test we get:



So... how to evaluate that haha
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #909 on: February 10, 2010, 05:19:54 pm »
0
for





Hence the limit is infinity.
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #910 on: February 10, 2010, 05:48:03 pm »
0
Your inequality shouldn't it be



coz they can be equal if n = 4, it's not undefined for n = 4...? why are you saying it is only greater?
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #911 on: February 10, 2010, 05:54:34 pm »
0
sure, you can do that if you want. Getting the maximal domain is not important, my one still does the job.
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #912 on: February 10, 2010, 06:10:15 pm »
0
yeah, true, thanks :)
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #913 on: February 10, 2010, 10:58:19 pm »
0
Just a note: have you looked at the ratio test?

Taking for example







:. Absolute convergence

It can make life a lot easier: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratio_test
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #914 on: February 10, 2010, 10:58:34 pm »
0


So applying the root test we get:



So let

Thus



I've used hospital on but it's too complicated...



Nvm fkn stupid arithmetic error grr
« Last Edit: February 10, 2010, 11:06:46 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.