Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

May 08, 2025, 09:04:09 am

Author Topic: TT's Maths Thread  (Read 133279 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #180 on: November 26, 2009, 02:14:54 am »
0
consider the sequence:

1,2,3,4.....n

it's arithmetic mean is

It's geometric mean is:

GM<AM by AM-GM. From which the result follows.

I noticed this inequality has been used many times in this thread, I love this pic btw, saw it in a textbook(a better version tho :P )

(Image removed from quote.)
haha that was so trivial lol

Yeah that pic is awesome, using similar triangles to derive AM-GM.
« Last Edit: November 26, 2009, 03:19:28 am by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Ahmad

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
  • *dreamy sigh*
  • Respect: +15
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #181 on: November 26, 2009, 02:43:10 am »
0
That picture is indeed cool!

Hint for 2: square everything then apply simple inequalities.
Mandark: Please, oh please, set me up on a date with that golden-haired angel who graces our undeserving school with her infinite beauty!

The collage of ideas. The music of reason. The poetry of thought. The canvas of logic.


TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #182 on: November 26, 2009, 04:47:28 pm »
0
q3.)

consider the sequence of do some AM-GM.
lol thanks I got it.

Using AM-GM on that sequence yields:







as required.

That picture is indeed cool!

Hint for 2: square everything then apply simple inequalities.
Thanks Ahmad! I think I got it now :)
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #183 on: November 26, 2009, 10:05:45 pm »
0
Induction can be used for Q 2 but it is very tedious and not very elegant...

Quote
Show that

For lower bound:

Base Case

Let



Inductive Hypothesis

Assume it is true for

is true.

Inductive Step

Need to prove it is true for



Multiply Inductive Hypothesis by



If we can show Then our proof is complete



Thus (Since )



For upper bound:

Base Case

Let



Inductive Hypothesis:

Assume it is true for

is true.

Inductive Step:

Need to prove it is true for



Multiply Inductive Hypothesis by



If we can show then our proof is complete.



Since then



Overall combining the lower and upper bounds we have proved:
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #184 on: November 26, 2009, 10:25:22 pm »
0
Alright last set of questions and then combinatorics time!

1. Let prove that

2. Let with . Find the minimum value of

3. Let . Prove that
« Last Edit: December 06, 2009, 06:02:40 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #185 on: November 26, 2009, 11:40:27 pm »
0
2. Looks a lot like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nesbitt%27s_inequality
But the constraint is different. Hmmm.

3.

Taking squares of both sides,



From am-gm







Adding:

« Last Edit: November 26, 2009, 11:46:37 pm by /0 »

Ahmad

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
  • *dreamy sigh*
  • Respect: +15
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #186 on: November 26, 2009, 11:46:08 pm »
0
It's also an application of CS,

Mandark: Please, oh please, set me up on a date with that golden-haired angel who graces our undeserving school with her infinite beauty!

The collage of ideas. The music of reason. The poetry of thought. The canvas of logic.


TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #187 on: November 26, 2009, 11:57:24 pm »
0
2. Looks a lot like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nesbitt%27s_inequality
But the constraint is different. Hmmm.

3.

Taking squares of both sides,



From am-gm







Adding:


haha I actually just did that but I took the AM-GM of and compared it with
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #188 on: November 27, 2009, 12:03:41 am »
0
2. Looks a lot like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nesbitt%27s_inequality
But the constraint is different. Hmmm.

3.

Taking squares of both sides,



From am-gm







Adding:


haha I actually just did that but I took the AM-GM of and compared it with



?


Anyway got a bit further with 2



If we use on the denominator terms and simplify we get



So we need to minimize



Then we could say so we need to minimize ..... nevermind shit idea

 hmm


TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #189 on: November 27, 2009, 12:13:34 am »
0
I think I got Q 1

Some rearranging leads to:





Which is true by Cauchy-Schwarz.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Ahmad

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
  • *dreamy sigh*
  • Respect: +15
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #190 on: November 27, 2009, 12:21:44 am »
0
The only part of the constraint in 2 that's important is that it means none of x, y, z can be 0. So it really does reduce to Nesbitt's, which is well known and admits many proofs :)
Mandark: Please, oh please, set me up on a date with that golden-haired angel who graces our undeserving school with her infinite beauty!

The collage of ideas. The music of reason. The poetry of thought. The canvas of logic.


/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #191 on: November 27, 2009, 12:32:50 am »
0
The only part of the constraint in 2 that's important is that it means none of x, y, z can be 0. So it really does reduce to Nesbitt's, which is well known and admits many proofs :)

Oh right indeed! *facepalm*
For some reason I thought you needed for nesbitt

Ahmad

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
  • *dreamy sigh*
  • Respect: +15
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #192 on: November 27, 2009, 12:37:17 am »
0
Nope, but you can assume that anyway since the inequality is homogeneous, so you might've seen people exploiting that. :)
Mandark: Please, oh please, set me up on a date with that golden-haired angel who graces our undeserving school with her infinite beauty!

The collage of ideas. The music of reason. The poetry of thought. The canvas of logic.


TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #193 on: November 27, 2009, 12:39:05 am »
0
Nope, but you can assume that anyway since the inequality is homogeneous, so you might've seen people exploiting that. :)
What does it mean when you say the inequality is homogeneous? As in it's 'symmetrical'? =]
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Ahmad

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
  • *dreamy sigh*
  • Respect: +15
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #194 on: November 27, 2009, 01:27:57 am »
0
Suppose the inequality is then it's homogeneous if .
Mandark: Please, oh please, set me up on a date with that golden-haired angel who graces our undeserving school with her infinite beauty!

The collage of ideas. The music of reason. The poetry of thought. The canvas of logic.