Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

June 06, 2025, 05:41:38 am

Author Topic: TT's Maths Thread  (Read 137979 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #615 on: January 04, 2010, 07:02:51 pm »
0
Quote
4. Prove there are infinitely many positive integers which cannot be represented as a sum of three perfect cubes

Okay, I'm not sure if this is the right way to go about this question, could someone please check it's validity.

I conjecture that all perfect cubes are congruent to either

Let be an integer.

Then in we have:







Now let be any perfect cubes.

Thus

However the least absolute residue is unaccounted for. Since there are infinitely many numbers congruent to then there are there are infinitely many positive integers which cannot be represented as a sum of three perfect cubes.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

zzdfa

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 328
  • Respect: +4
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #616 on: January 04, 2010, 07:12:41 pm »
0
looks right to me!

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #617 on: January 04, 2010, 07:15:11 pm »
0
Awesome, the only thing that took me a long time to get was the

I knew we had to deal with some kinda of , so I tried none worked.

So is there a faster way to find out how the cubes were related to rather than experimentation?

Also since this question was in the modular arithmetic chapter I knew I had to playing around with mods, if it wasn't there was no way I could have thought of .

So yeah, what is a fast way to see the link between and cubes?
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #618 on: January 04, 2010, 08:46:09 pm »
0
You have three terms involved, hence you need something with an absolute residue class of 4. This means you have to look at at least mod 8.

by the 18th century "power tables" were used for computations. Perhaps not as famous trig or log tables but you can find a few modular arithmetic tables at the back of disquisitiones arithmeticae

In general. If we consider for some relatively prime integers and the residues of We find that two of them must be equal by the pigeonhole principle:

(with k>n)

(because and are relatively prime)


hence always has a solution when (a,m)=1

9=3^2 and so it is expected that there are many numbers relatively prime to it and any number not relatively prime to it will by =0 mod 9  (because the numebr will have 3 as factor, hence it cube will have 27 and hence 9 as a factor)
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #619 on: January 04, 2010, 08:48:34 pm »
0
Thanks kamil, that was very clever :P

Alright, this next set is all IMO and Putnam questions :P (This is gonna be fun...)

1. When is written in decimal notation, the sum of its digits is . Let be the sum of the digits of . Find the sum of the digits of . ( and are written in decimal notation.)

2. The number has nine (not necessarily distinct) decimal digits. The number is such that each of the nine -digit numbers formed by replacing just one of the digits is by the corresponding digit is divisible by . The number is related to in the same way: that is each of the nine numbers formed by replacing one of the by the corresponding is divisible by . Show that for each , is divisible by . (For example, if then may be or , since and are multiples of ).

3. Suppose are integers with . For any integer , let . Show that if is congruent to then and .
« Last Edit: January 08, 2010, 05:16:48 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

brightsky

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3136
  • Respect: +200
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #620 on: January 04, 2010, 10:23:41 pm »
0
Lemme have a crack at question 1.

First, let .







...meaning that X must have less than or equal to 17777 digits in it. (TT Edit)

A sum of the digits of any number must be greater or equal to . That is to say that, A (the sum of the digits of X) must have no more than 17776*9 = 159984 digits.

It is to note here that the number with the largest sum of digits below 159984 is 99999, which has a sum of 45. From this, we can see that B (the sum of the digits of A) must have no more than 5*9 = 45 digits.

Similarly, it is to note here that the number with the largest sum of digits below 45 is 39, which has a digit sum of 12. Hence, we can say that C (where C is the sum of the digits of B) must have less than or equal to 12 digits.

Remember now the divisibility test for 9. An integer is divisible by 9 if and only if the sum of its digits (in decimal notation), is divisible by 9. Quick proof for this is seen here,

That is to say that:

, for any natural number N.

Hence, we can see that:

 

As 4444 = 9 x 493 + 7

                [1]

Now lets do some tests with the number 7.





                                     [2]

From [1],







From [2],



That means that, . Because C > 12, hence C must be 7.

Edit: I'm still learning how to use latex properly. Why is there a huge gap in the modulos? This is just a simple solution, there must be more elegant alternatives.
« Last Edit: January 05, 2010, 12:06:31 am by brightsky »
2020 - 2021: Master of Public Health, The University of Sydney
2017 - 2020: Doctor of Medicine, The University of Melbourne
2014 - 2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine, The University of Melbourne
2013 ATAR: 99.95

Currently selling copies of the VCE Chinese Exam Revision Book and UMEP Maths Exam Revision Book, and accepting students for Maths Methods and Specialist Maths Tutoring in 2020!

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #621 on: January 04, 2010, 10:39:54 pm »
0
The proof starts from the Peano Postulates, which define the natural
numbers N. N is the smallest set satisfying these postulates:

  P1.  1 is in N.
  P2.  If x is in N, then its "successor" x' is in N.
  P3.  There is no x such that x' = 1.
  P4.  If x isn't 1, then there is a y in N such that y' = x.
  P5.  If S is a subset of N, 1 is in S, and the implication
       (x in S => x' in S) holds, then S = N.

Then you have to define addition recursively:
  Def: Let a and b be in N. If b = 1, then define a + b = a'
       (using P1 and P2). If b isn't 1, then let c' = b, with c in N
       (using P4), and define a + b = (a + c)'.

Then you have to define 2:
  Def:  2 = 1'

2 is in N by P1, P2, and the definition of 2.

Theorem:  1 + 1 = 2

Proof: Use the first part of the definition of + with a = b = 1.
       Then 1 + 1 = 1' = 2  Q.E.D.

Note: There is an alternate formulation of the Peano Postulates which
replaces 1 with 0 in P1, P3, P4, and P5. Then you have to change the
definition of addition to this:
  Def: Let a and b be in N. If b = 0, then define a + b = a.
       If b isn't 0, then let c' = b, with c in N, and define
       a + b = (a + c)'.

You also have to define 1 = 0', and 2 = 1'. Then the proof of the
Theorem above is a little different:

Proof: Use the second part of the definition of + first:
       1 + 1 = (1 + 0)'
       Now use the first part of the definition of + on the sum in
       parentheses:  1 + 1 = (1)' = 1' = 2  Q.E.D.

Here's the proof but I still don't understand it.
http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/51551.html
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

brightsky

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3136
  • Respect: +200
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #622 on: January 04, 2010, 10:44:05 pm »
0
Yep. Found the proof there. But I still don't understand it..
2020 - 2021: Master of Public Health, The University of Sydney
2017 - 2020: Doctor of Medicine, The University of Melbourne
2014 - 2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine, The University of Melbourne
2013 ATAR: 99.95

Currently selling copies of the VCE Chinese Exam Revision Book and UMEP Maths Exam Revision Book, and accepting students for Maths Methods and Specialist Maths Tutoring in 2020!

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #623 on: January 04, 2010, 10:45:03 pm »
0
Can you help me solve for ?
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

brightsky

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3136
  • Respect: +200
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #624 on: January 04, 2010, 11:07:25 pm »
0
Think you can solve this by diophantine equations...(Can I?)

Assuming that x is a integer:

, where N is a positive integer.







N + 1 and x are both integers

must also be an integer

Let where is an integer.











N and 5k_1 - 3 are integers

is an integer.


Contradiction. Hence no solutions.
« Last Edit: January 04, 2010, 11:10:49 pm by brightsky »
2020 - 2021: Master of Public Health, The University of Sydney
2017 - 2020: Doctor of Medicine, The University of Melbourne
2014 - 2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine, The University of Melbourne
2013 ATAR: 99.95

Currently selling copies of the VCE Chinese Exam Revision Book and UMEP Maths Exam Revision Book, and accepting students for Maths Methods and Specialist Maths Tutoring in 2020!

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #625 on: January 04, 2010, 11:09:45 pm »
0
Kewl.

I think this proof follows on nicely from the one you posted. Just an extension.

Prove that for a base 10 number it is congruent mod 11 to the number's 'units digit' - 'tens digit' + 'hundreds digit' - 'thousands digit' .....
« Last Edit: January 04, 2010, 11:12:16 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #626 on: January 04, 2010, 11:13:48 pm »
0
there is a much simpler way:



10x is even, 3 is odd, therefore 10x-3 is odd. But 12k is even. contradiction.
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #627 on: January 04, 2010, 11:39:47 pm »
0
"Introduction to Number Theory" - Zuckerman, theorem 2.13 states that:
"Let denote . Then has no solutions if "
Clearly that applies to here too


Also, I think for divisibility by 11... if you have a number,

Since

, ...

So


brightsky

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3136
  • Respect: +200
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #628 on: January 04, 2010, 11:39:59 pm »
0
We are looking at the number

Consider these two patterns:

Pattern 1:







...

Pattern 2:







...

Now back to our original equation, we see that:









...

Hence, rewriting the equation:





Because the numbers in brackets are all multiples of 11, hence, the number is congruent to mod 11 if the remaining numbers are multiples of 11.

Hence,

2020 - 2021: Master of Public Health, The University of Sydney
2017 - 2020: Doctor of Medicine, The University of Melbourne
2014 - 2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine, The University of Melbourne
2013 ATAR: 99.95

Currently selling copies of the VCE Chinese Exam Revision Book and UMEP Maths Exam Revision Book, and accepting students for Maths Methods and Specialist Maths Tutoring in 2020!

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #629 on: January 04, 2010, 11:42:31 pm »
0
"Introduction to Number Theory" - Zuckerman, theorem 2.13 states that:
"Let denote . Then has no solutions if "
Clearly that applies to here too


Also, I think for divisibility by 11... if you have a number,

Since

, ...

So


Nice /0, exactly the one I had in mind too XD
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.