Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

May 20, 2025, 09:11:24 am

Author Topic: TT's Maths Thread  (Read 134745 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1080 on: October 21, 2010, 11:49:52 pm »
0
Suppose a gambler with $n plans to bet $1 a time on the toss of a coin, until he reaches $100 or $0. What is the probability of going broke starting with $n? First make a recurrence relation to represent the situation and then solve it.

Hmmm how would I start this question?

Not helping, but I remember doing this when I was trying to get a strategy for winning roulette. Not sure about doing it analytically, but I ran a simulation 1,000,000 times and approximated the long-term probability :P
Link to arxiv or published paper or it didn't happen.

sif publish that. did you watch 21? people get beaten up for that shit :P
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1081 on: October 24, 2010, 08:37:25 pm »
0
Are the following true in general?

If a vector field F can be written into 2 parts, F_1 being conservative and F_2 is non conversative then:


PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1082 on: October 24, 2010, 08:43:15 pm »
0
Also with the same initial conditions on F, are these true?

PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1083 on: October 24, 2010, 08:44:54 pm »
0
You mean if ? Then yep that's true (just from distributivity of the curl operator), and also , so

And also as far as I know ur next post should be true too (distributivity of the integral operator)

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1084 on: October 24, 2010, 08:46:57 pm »
0
Thanks man, lol yeah i forgot the latex for mathbf
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1085 on: October 24, 2010, 09:00:13 pm »
0
wth is up with this Q?

isn't the answer 0?
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1086 on: October 25, 2010, 02:04:42 am »
0
Hmm I get

At ,

The surface normal pointing upwards is just , so

So essentially you're integrating over the disc , probably a good idea to switch to polar coordinates.
« Last Edit: October 25, 2010, 05:39:47 am by /0 »

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1087 on: October 27, 2010, 03:51:28 pm »
0
Hmm I get

At ,

The surface normal pointing upwards is just , so

So essentially you're integrating over the disc , probably a good idea to switch to polar coordinates.
Oh that's right, opps I thought it was the surface integral of a scalar function haha, silly me, thanks /0!!!

(Trust you to be good with this kinda maths :P)
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1088 on: November 01, 2010, 05:17:49 pm »
0
Any help with this?

Thanks :D

Actually nevermind, I got it, but I was still wondering how do you approach these questions generally? Do you need to visualise what solid region you are integrating and then set the spherical coordinates?
« Last Edit: November 01, 2010, 05:23:12 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1089 on: November 01, 2010, 05:42:51 pm »
0
pretty much, yeah

Or you can treat it like a jacobian transformation, do a few simultaneous eqns to find the boundaries. This method is longer, but more general.
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1090 on: November 01, 2010, 08:08:15 pm »
0
Thanks Mao!

Another one...

[IMG]http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/4751/mth2010examhelp.jpg[/img]

I got part a) b) c) however I am just unsure on part d)

For a) I got

b)

So

c) Not required for d)

d) So area of surface

(I've double checked this, it's correct :))

So

But what are the bounds for the double integral?

Are we allowed to convert to polar coordinates? Cause I'm interpreting the question as set up the integral purely in cartesian axis, if it's in polar coordinates then it's quite easy and becomes trivial.

Thanks!
« Last Edit: November 01, 2010, 08:16:11 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1091 on: November 01, 2010, 08:54:50 pm »
0






I think... this is the annulus you might have to integrate over. If this is right it might require the sum of two integrals to get the whole area

e.g.

But yeah polar coordinates would be nice
« Last Edit: November 01, 2010, 09:00:42 pm by /0 »

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1092 on: November 01, 2010, 08:59:10 pm »
0
yup I know that, it's between 2 circles right? So without converting to polar coordinates it's incredibly hard to write the integrals, you need like 4....

however with polar its so easy?
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1093 on: November 01, 2010, 10:17:24 pm »
0
yeah the question was probably designed to test your parametrizing skills more than anything.
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1094 on: November 01, 2010, 10:27:39 pm »
0
thought so... thanks heaps guys!
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.