Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 02, 2025, 02:48:04 am

Author Topic: TT's Maths Thread  (Read 146759 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dcc

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Respect: +55
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1140 on: December 23, 2010, 10:24:49 pm »
0
I forgot what least squares are... havn't seen it since first year and it was quite boring. However the system may have infinitely many solutions if the column vectors are linearly independent. Your theorem applies to ones with linearly independent columns.

It's one of those things they made us cover to ensure they had enough content for the exam. :(

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1141 on: December 23, 2010, 10:31:39 pm »
0
thanks was so late i misread that initial condition :(
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1142 on: March 03, 2011, 03:05:16 am »
0
Prove that if then where is the Mobius function.

Thanks :)
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

humph

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +16
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1143 on: March 03, 2011, 12:49:01 pm »
0
Long (but more easily generalised) proof:


Definition
An arithmetic function is a complex-valued function defined on the natural numbers, that is, a function .


Example
(1)   The identity function defined by

(2)   The unity function defined by

(3)   The Mobius function} defined by



Definition
An arithmetic function is multiplicative if, for , whenever (that is, whenever and are coprime).


Lemma
A multiplicative functions is completely determined by its values on prime powers.

Proof
This is a simple application of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic.


Definition
The Dirichlet convolution of two arithmetic functions is the function defined by



Proposition
If and are multiplicative, then their Dirichlet convolution is also multiplicative.

Proof
If , then every divisor of can be written uniquely in the form , where and , and so



Combining everything, we can prove the following theorem.

Theorem
We have the identity


Proof
We must show that . As is multiplicative, being the Dirichlet convolution of two multiplicative functions, it suffices to show this merely for prime powers. So for a prime power , we have

as , , and for .





Obviously this proof can be trimmed down a fair bit, but it's very useful for showing other identities among arithmetic functions.
VCE 2006
PhB (Hons) (Sc), ANU, 2007-2010
MPhil, ANU, 2011-2012
PhD, Princeton, 2012-2017
Research Associate, University College London, 2017-2020
Assistant Professor, University of Virginia, 2020-

Feel free to ask me about (advanced) mathematics.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1144 on: March 03, 2011, 02:49:20 pm »
0
Notice that this is really just equivalent to "every finite non-empty set has as many even subsets as odd subsets" and there are many ways of showing this. Already discussed here http://vce.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,19896.msg207276.html#msg207276 
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1145 on: March 07, 2011, 10:19:18 pm »
0
Ahh yeah, thanks for that guys, really good explanations!!

I just have another question:

[IMG]http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/9163/92562440.jpg[/img]



PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

humph

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +16
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1146 on: March 07, 2011, 11:16:33 pm »
0
I'm guessing you just missed the obvious, but (c) is pretty trivial. It's not true if just by plugging in. So suppose that . We are asked to classify the integers such that . Note that


So for the equality to hold, we must have that


That is, there must be no divisors of other than itself and . This is precisely the definition of a prime number.

Part (b) is pretty easy too: the major hint is Fermat's little theorem.
« Last Edit: March 07, 2011, 11:20:09 pm by humph »
VCE 2006
PhB (Hons) (Sc), ANU, 2007-2010
MPhil, ANU, 2011-2012
PhD, Princeton, 2012-2017
Research Associate, University College London, 2017-2020
Assistant Professor, University of Virginia, 2020-

Feel free to ask me about (advanced) mathematics.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1147 on: March 09, 2011, 04:13:53 pm »
0
oh yes, stupid me haha.

thanks humph!
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1148 on: March 15, 2011, 02:26:53 am »
0
[IMG]http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/3013/68209502.jpg[/img]

I don't get this question, , does the question mean for

I can show that

But how can I show the latter? ie, that a nilpotent matrix can be invertible (or non invertible?)

Thanks
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1149 on: March 15, 2011, 03:36:08 am »
0
Aha, a 2021 question I see? I do remember them having a special love for determinants in that course.

If , this then implies

Thus N is not invertible.
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1150 on: March 15, 2011, 04:59:20 am »
0
aha i see, shudda seen that trick, thanks mao
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1151 on: March 15, 2011, 05:03:20 am »
0
also got another one, maybe its just 5 am in the morning but i cant see what b) is asking?

[IMG]http://img546.imageshack.us/img546/5854/83956954.jpg[/img]

a) is quite simple and I can do c) as well, but what exactly is b) asking for? deduce what about it...?

Cheers
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1152 on: March 15, 2011, 09:26:19 am »
0
is also invertible. Right-Multiplying (a) by , then left-multiplying by ,



Hence, is the left inverse of

You can similarly manipulate (a) to show that has a right inverse.


TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1153 on: March 30, 2011, 07:15:39 pm »
0
[IMG]http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/8905/detlz.jpg[/img]

If det(A) = -7 find det(B)

I was thinking of applying elementary row operations to A to change it to B and then use the fact that det(E_1E_2...E_rA) = det(E_1)det(E_2)...det(A)

however it seems like guess work to find the E_j's...
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: TT's Maths Thread
« Reply #1154 on: March 30, 2011, 07:31:48 pm »
0
hint:
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."