Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 04, 2025, 09:05:25 pm

Author Topic: 1,000,000 Question Thread :D  (Read 45077 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: 1,000,000 Question Thread :D
« Reply #135 on: December 07, 2009, 05:54:16 pm »
0
(/inty,5] closed circle?

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: 1,000,000 Question Thread :D
« Reply #136 on: December 07, 2009, 05:59:10 pm »
0
Maybe you forgot the negative. But otherwise yes, it is:



So using the same principle you can work out the domain of the line on the RHS.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: 1,000,000 Question Thread :D
« Reply #137 on: December 07, 2009, 06:06:38 pm »
0
So it is [5,/inty)?

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: 1,000,000 Question Thread :D
« Reply #138 on: December 07, 2009, 06:10:35 pm »
0
So it is [5,/inty)?
Correct :)



So now if you take the union of those 2 what do you get?

:)

Which is the 'overall' domain of those 2, or more formally, the domain of the hybrid function.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: 1,000,000 Question Thread :D
« Reply #139 on: December 07, 2009, 06:12:49 pm »
0
Thx!

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: 1,000,000 Question Thread :D
« Reply #140 on: December 07, 2009, 06:15:30 pm »
0
The length of a rectanle is 4cm more than the width. If the length were to be decreased by 5cm and the width decreased by 2cm, the perimeter would be 18cm. Calculate the dimensions of the rectangle.

l=w+4
l-5=w+4-2

l-5=w+2
2(l-5)+2(w+2)=18

l=19/2cm and w=5/2cm is this correct?

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: 1,000,000 Question Thread :D
« Reply #141 on: December 07, 2009, 07:02:20 pm »
0
Um...I don't get that answer.
My equations are



and


kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: 1,000,000 Question Thread :D
« Reply #142 on: December 07, 2009, 07:22:16 pm »
0
So you disregarded the previous statement?

m@tty

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4324
  • Respect: +33
  • School: Heatherton Christian College
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: 1,000,000 Question Thread :D
« Reply #143 on: December 07, 2009, 07:28:45 pm »
0
No after getting to the equation /0 has you sub in and solve.
« Last Edit: December 07, 2009, 07:48:44 pm by m@tty »
2009/2010: Mathematical Methods(non-CAS) ; Business Management | English ; Literature - Physics ; Chemistry - Specialist Mathematics ; MUEP Maths

96.85

2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering and Bachelor of Science, Monash University

2015-____: To infinity and beyond.

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: 1,000,000 Question Thread :D
« Reply #144 on: December 07, 2009, 07:37:54 pm »
0
So you disregarded the previous statement?

Another way to think of it, let L' and W' be the new lengths after reduction.
L' = L - 5
W' = W - 2

The new perimeter is given by

2L'+2W' = 18

2(L-5)+2(W-2)=18

However, the equation L = W+4 still holds, since that was before the reduction in dimensions.

Using these two equations  you can solve for L and W.

kyzoo

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2040
  • Respect: +23
Re: 1,000,000 Question Thread :D
« Reply #145 on: December 07, 2009, 08:46:38 pm »
0
kenhung I answered this question in your other thread. And I don't think you need simultaneous equations at all.
2009
~ Methods (Non-CAS) [48 --> 49.4]

2010
~ Spesh [50 --> 51.6]
~ Physics [50 --> 50]
~ Chem [43 --> 46.5]
~ English [46 --> 46.2]
~ UMEP Maths [5.0]

2010 ATAR: 99.90
Aggregate 206.8

NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT ME ON EMAIL - [email protected] if you are looking for a swift reply.

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: 1,000,000 Question Thread :D
« Reply #146 on: December 07, 2009, 09:27:00 pm »
0
The length of a rectanle is 4cm more than the width. If the length were to be decreased by 5cm and the width decreased by 2cm, the perimeter would be 18cm. Calculate the dimensions of the rectangle.

l=w+4
l-5=w+4-2

l-5=w+2
2(l-5)+2(w+2)=18

l=19/2cm and w=5/2cm is this correct?
What is mathematically wrong in my equations? Why can't I carry on the information provided previously to construct my equation 2?

Cataclysmic

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 133
  • Respect: +2
Re: 1,000,000 Question Thread :D
« Reply #147 on: December 07, 2009, 09:31:48 pm »
0
Look at your 1st equation. Say L = 10, then W = 6.
Your 2nd equation would say 5 = 8.
They've taken 5 from the length and 2 from the width.

Your EQ 1: L = W+4
Your EQ 2: l-5 = w+4 - 2
In equation 1, LHS = RHS, so if you minus 5 from the LHS, you need to -5 from the RHS for them to equal one another.
vce 08 it apps
vce 09 eng mm sm phys chi(sl)
uni 10 commerce/aerospace engineering at Monash

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: 1,000,000 Question Thread :D
« Reply #148 on: December 08, 2009, 02:05:19 pm »
0
It says the length is 4cm more than width so L=W+4, the width requires 4cm more to be same as length?

Ilovemathsmeth

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1370
  • Respect: +7
Re: 1,000,000 Question Thread :D
« Reply #149 on: December 08, 2009, 02:17:32 pm »
0
I think so based on only that info.
Raw Scores:
Psychology 50 | Mathematical Methods 49 | Further Mathematics 49 | Accounting 49 | Chemistry 44 | English 43
ATAR: 99.75