Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

December 31, 2025, 03:13:36 am

Author Topic: Silly Questions Thread  (Read 33119 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

the.watchman

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2526
  • Respect: +10
Re: Silly Questions Thread
« Reply #195 on: April 21, 2010, 05:25:26 pm »
0
One 'shortcut' is to let the and then work out on that domain, this range is the range of .

Exactly what I meant ... but expressed WAY neater :(
Remember, remember the 5th of November

2010 - MM CAS (47) - Cisco 1+2 (pass :P)
2011 - Eng - Phys - Chem - Spesh - Latin - UMAT
ATAR - 99.00+ plz... :)

Feel free to PM me for anything :D

Aqualim

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 656
  • Respect: +17
Re: Silly Questions Thread
« Reply #196 on: April 22, 2010, 04:13:38 pm »
0
Simplify;


Could you go any futher than this;



/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: Silly Questions Thread
« Reply #197 on: April 22, 2010, 04:20:52 pm »
0
The last step is incorrect,



I think your second last step is as far as you can go. Even the original equation I would say looks 'simplified'. It's a matter of opinion.


(3500 posts, yay! XD)

Aqualim

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 656
  • Respect: +17
Re: Silly Questions Thread
« Reply #198 on: April 22, 2010, 06:31:39 pm »
0
Also when dealing with matrices;

A reflection in the y-axis is different to a reflection from the y-axis yeah?

reflection from the y-axis =

reflection in the y-axis =

If I'm correct?

Blakhitman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1954
  • Respect: +7
Re: Silly Questions Thread
« Reply #199 on: April 22, 2010, 06:37:08 pm »
0
I haven't heard "from the whaterver axis" when it comes to reflections *scratch*.


Aqualim

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 656
  • Respect: +17
Re: Silly Questions Thread
« Reply #200 on: April 22, 2010, 06:43:36 pm »
0
actually don't worry, my mistake. :P

Aqualim

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 656
  • Respect: +17
Re: Silly Questions Thread
« Reply #201 on: June 30, 2010, 03:01:06 pm »
0
Would this is classified as a suitable line of working for a 3 mark question? My main concern is writing 'solve' in the line of working, which would be taken directly from the calculator.

6. Find in exact form all real solutions to the equation


Let





Since





« Last Edit: June 30, 2010, 03:09:13 pm by Aqualim »

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Silly Questions Thread
« Reply #202 on: June 30, 2010, 03:07:19 pm »
0
you can definitely solve that by hand so I'd say you need to show working by hand.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

brightsky

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3136
  • Respect: +200
Re: Silly Questions Thread
« Reply #203 on: June 30, 2010, 03:09:48 pm »
0
Let



Multiply a to both sides:









By the null factor law,

or or

or "a has no real solutions as " or

Hence or



or

or "x has no solutions"

Hence is the only solution.
2020 - 2021: Master of Public Health, The University of Sydney
2017 - 2020: Doctor of Medicine, The University of Melbourne
2014 - 2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine, The University of Melbourne
2013 ATAR: 99.95

Currently selling copies of the VCE Chinese Exam Revision Book and UMEP Maths Exam Revision Book, and accepting students for Maths Methods and Specialist Maths Tutoring in 2020!

Blakhitman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1954
  • Respect: +7
Re: Silly Questions Thread
« Reply #204 on: June 30, 2010, 03:10:23 pm »
0
In further apparently, writing the solve part (or any calc functions) is sufficient working out :D.

Aqualim

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 656
  • Respect: +17
Re: Silly Questions Thread
« Reply #205 on: June 30, 2010, 04:40:46 pm »
0
For the function with the rule find the rule for the inverse function.

When finding the rule, would I have to use the Quadratic Formula at some point?

the.watchman

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2526
  • Respect: +10
Re: Silly Questions Thread
« Reply #206 on: June 30, 2010, 05:00:33 pm »
0
For the function with the rule find the rule for the inverse function.

When finding the rule, would I have to use the Quadratic Formula at some point?

Absolutement! Unless you want to complete the square manually :)
Remember, remember the 5th of November

2010 - MM CAS (47) - Cisco 1+2 (pass :P)
2011 - Eng - Phys - Chem - Spesh - Latin - UMAT
ATAR - 99.00+ plz... :)

Feel free to PM me for anything :D

Aqualim

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 656
  • Respect: +17
Re: Silly Questions Thread
« Reply #207 on: June 30, 2010, 05:03:20 pm »
0
For the function with the rule find the rule for the inverse function.

When finding the rule, would I have to use the Quadratic Formula at some point?

Absolutement! Unless you want to complete the square manually :)

How would you do it manually?

the.watchman

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2526
  • Respect: +10
Re: Silly Questions Thread
« Reply #208 on: June 30, 2010, 05:04:54 pm »
0
For the function with the rule find the rule for the inverse function.

When finding the rule, would I have to use the Quadratic Formula at some point?

Absolutement! Unless you want to complete the square manually :)

How would you do it manually?

By completing the square...

Let





Then complete the square like normal :)
Remember, remember the 5th of November

2010 - MM CAS (47) - Cisco 1+2 (pass :P)
2011 - Eng - Phys - Chem - Spesh - Latin - UMAT
ATAR - 99.00+ plz... :)

Feel free to PM me for anything :D

Aqualim

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 656
  • Respect: +17
Re: Silly Questions Thread
« Reply #209 on: July 01, 2010, 01:28:45 pm »
0
For the function with the rule find the rule for the inverse function.

When finding the rule, would I have to use the Quadratic Formula at some point?

Absolutement! Unless you want to complete the square manually :)

How would you do it manually?

By completing the square...

Let





Then complete the square like normal :)

Ok I got two answers;



since the domain says its negative only, then I'm assuming the inverse would be quadratic with the negative in it. But after sketching on the calculator it doesn't look like its inverse?