Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 16, 2025, 11:26:33 am

Author Topic: sig figs  (Read 1218 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

amar

  • Guest
sig figs
« on: January 05, 2010, 12:25:02 pm »
0
When there are sub parts to questions (for example: 1a, 1b etc), do we consider the number of significant figures to clip our answers to from the data given up until that point, all the data in the question (including numbers that are in sub-parts after the question being answered) or only the figures in the 'main body' of the question.

amar

  • Guest
Re: sig figs
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2010, 03:38:57 pm »
0
good question

amar

  • Guest
Re: sig figs
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2010, 03:39:18 pm »
0
I agree someone should answer it.

Lighties

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 90
  • Respect: +1
Re: sig figs
« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2010, 04:27:18 pm »
0
I would think that you clip them to all the data given until that point, that you are using to work out your solution.

Not entirely sure on that, though.
2010.

jimmy999

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 635
  • Respect: +5
Re: sig figs
« Reply #4 on: January 05, 2010, 04:32:56 pm »
0
Say you work through your answer using 5 decimal places, and the answer wants 3 significant figures so lets assume that goes to only 2 decimal places, then your entire working out for all parts of the question should use 5 decimal places, and whenever you get to an answer, you put it to 3 significant figures. That way your answer will stay accurate because sometimes cutting down to significant figures too early can alter your result greatly
Religion and Society (38), IT - Software Development (45) English (35), Chemistry (49), Methods CAS (48), Specialist Maths (50)
ENTER: 99.15

2010 - Bachelor of Science(Maths)/Engineering(Chemical) - Monash Clayton

jayfan

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 28
  • Respect: +1
Re: sig figs
« Reply #5 on: January 07, 2010, 12:43:29 pm »
0
Say you work through your answer using 5 decimal places, and the answer wants 3 significant figures so lets assume that goes to only 2 decimal places, then your entire working out for all parts of the question should use 5 decimal places, and whenever you get to an answer, you put it to 3 significant figures. That way your answer will stay accurate because sometimes cutting down to significant figures too early can alter your result greatly

im assuming jimmy999 is suggesting keeping your results in your calculator all the way through, but only writing down answers correct to 3 sig figs

my teacher says the opposite of that - we are taught to round off to the number of significant figures of the least accurate data used in a calculation at the end of THAT calculation. this means you round off each step, and then use that rounded off answer in your next step.

i think this reasoning makes sense in the real world, because when you are doing experiments, your results can only be as accurate as your least accurate apparatus, which would THEN influence all your subsequent calculations. -- i.e. there's no point in keeping your results in your calculator even though it would be more "mathematically" correct
2008: Chinese [45], Mathematical Methods [44]
2009: ESL [50], Specialist Mathematics [48], Chemistry [47], Physics [44], Economics [49]

2010: Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne

longy1991

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 40
  • Respect: +1
Re: sig figs
« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2010, 11:35:57 am »
0
do not round off your answer in calculations, only in the answer, otherwise you could get the wrong answer. This happens often in physics, chem and all maths. Kids do lose marks because of rounding too early.
It says this in one of the VCAA reports by the way (but that might have been a methods one)
2008: Biology 43
2009: Chemistry 50 || English 44 || Mathematical Methods (Non-CAS) 50 || Physical Education 43 || Specialist Mathematics 40
ENTER: 99.65
2010-2014: MBBS at Monash Clayton

PM me anytime :)!

superflya

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1763
  • EL-Heat.
  • Respect: +8
Re: sig figs
« Reply #7 on: January 11, 2010, 11:48:10 am »
0
do not round off your answer in calculations, only in the answer, otherwise you could get the wrong answer. This happens often in physics, chem and all maths. Kids do lose marks because of rounding too early.
It says this in one of the VCAA reports by the way (but that might have been a methods one)

+1
2010- English, Methods (CAS), Physics, Specialist, Chem.
2011- Bachelor of Commerce/Aerospace Engineering - Monash


"The day i stop learning, is the day i walk away from the game" Michael Jordan.

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: sig figs
« Reply #8 on: January 11, 2010, 12:06:21 pm »
0

the.watchman

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2526
  • Respect: +10
Re: sig figs
« Reply #9 on: January 11, 2010, 12:09:04 pm »
0
Lolwut? :)
Remember, remember the 5th of November

2010 - MM CAS (47) - Cisco 1+2 (pass :P)
2011 - Eng - Phys - Chem - Spesh - Latin - UMAT
ATAR - 99.00+ plz... :)

Feel free to PM me for anything :D

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: sig figs
« Reply #10 on: January 11, 2010, 12:12:41 pm »
0
His talking to himself?

brightsky

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3136
  • Respect: +200
Re: sig figs
« Reply #11 on: January 11, 2010, 12:19:44 pm »
0
lolz..
2020 - 2021: Master of Public Health, The University of Sydney
2017 - 2020: Doctor of Medicine, The University of Melbourne
2014 - 2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine, The University of Melbourne
2013 ATAR: 99.95

Currently selling copies of the VCE Chinese Exam Revision Book and UMEP Maths Exam Revision Book, and accepting students for Maths Methods and Specialist Maths Tutoring in 2020!