Marks correlation to Study Score

[kyzoo]

If anyone has their Statement of Marks, please share your exact marks so we can see what mark corresponds to what Study Score (for future SS predictions!)

Methods Non-CAS
- SAC Score: Not sure, didn't get Statement of Results, raw SAC score was 93-95/100 which would have been scaled up.
- Exam 1 : 39.5/40 (Lol apparantly one of the markers didn't like my explanation for the last question)
- Exam 2 : 78/80
- Total: 117.5/120

Study Score: 48

[brightsky]

What?!?!?! Those scores correspond to a 48!!! *faints*

[m@tty]

Methods non-CAS
-SAC's
   RAW: 100
   Moderated: 97
-Exam 1: 39/40 (A+=37/40)
-Exam 2: 70.5/80 (A+=69/80)

Total: 109.5/120

Study Score: 42

Business Management
-SAC's
   RAW: 90, 96
   Moderated: 90, 95
-Exam: 49.5/60 (A+=50.5/60)

Study Score: 39

I think we should have a stickied thread containing this information at the top of the respective subject board.

[vexx]

Psychology (Soon to be inspected/remarked though...)
Sacs: approx. 95/100
Exam 1: 167/180
Exam 2: 167/180 (marked wrong >.<)
Score: 44

[amirite?]

Methods looks brutal but that BusMan damn! Polar opposite. I should have done BusMan.

Psych. Eeek. 83.5/90, 6.5 mistakes for a 44. Im not sure whether thats a good thing or a bad thing. 

[m@tty]

Methods looks brutal but that BusMan damn! Polar opposite. I should have done BusMan.

How?  :uglystupid2: I lost the same amount of marks in each, yet there is a 10 point difference in their scaled scores.

[IntoTheNewWorld]

Japanese SL
SACs 100/100 (lol at my teacher. Most rigged marking ever)
Written Examination 70.5/75
Oral Examination 99/100

SS: 50

<3 Jap mark ranges.

[brightsky]

Does anyone have Chinese SL mark correlations?

[/0]

Methods Non-CAS
- SAC Score: Not sure, didn't get Statement of Results, raw SAC score was 93-95/100 which would have been scaled up.
- Exam 1 : 39.5/40 (Lol apparantly one of the markers didn't like my explanation for the last question)
- Exam 2 : 78/80
- Total: 117.5/120

Study Score: 48

Great job on the score, but the way they worked that out sucks. Last year I lost 2 more marks in exam 1 and got 48

[kenhung123]

That's about 1 mark per study score. That's just like further!

[kyzoo]

^ Exactly, that's what I've been saying.

But, I didn't make this thread to gain support for the idea that Methods is harsh  

[stonecold]

I really should change my sig to reflect that there is zero chance of me getting 50 in methods. 

[vexx]

I really should change my sig to reflect that there is zero chance of me getting 50 in methods. 

Aim for 45+ for methods, getting 46-48 is still very good, if you are able to get this and a 45+ in two other subjects (incl. an english) you will definitely get 99+

[stonecold]

^^^

yeah, 45+ is realistic.  I just like to aim high because even though I probably wont get there, at least I will get close.

And yepp, that is my plan, 45+ in methods, chem and EL and I am pretty well set. *dreams*

Physics and English on the other hand are a lost cause!

[vexx]

^^^

yeah, 45+ is realistic.  I just like to aim high because even though I probably wont get there, at least I will get close.

And yepp, that is my plan, 45+ in methods, chem and EL and I am pretty well set. *dreams*

Physics and English on the other hand are a lost cause!

if you focus on just those three, those no reason you can't do very well in them.
i'm focus'ing on all my subjects though haha because unless my psych is pushed up a few after remark. i don't have the luxury of an already high 40's.
but its always good to focus on everything anyway cos you never know if you may screw a subject up.. meh