Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 26, 2025, 08:49:56 pm

Author Topic: Maths Methods Roll Call 2010  (Read 62909 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Blakhitman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1954
  • Respect: +7
Re: Maths Methods Roll Call 2010
« Reply #45 on: January 24, 2010, 12:17:43 am »
0
Anyone else using Heinemann VCE zone? I think it's a good book, but from what I've been reading Essentials is the best, I'm thinking of buying that too, do people think it's worth the trouble?

Akirus

  • Guest
Re: Maths Methods Roll Call 2010
« Reply #46 on: January 24, 2010, 12:20:35 am »
0


Anyone else using Heinemann VCE zone? I think it's a good book, but from what I've been reading Essentials is the best, I'm thinking of buying that too, do people think it's worth the trouble?

Just get the PDF and do questions from it when you have time.

Ilovemathsmeth

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1370
  • Respect: +7
Re: Maths Methods Roll Call 2010
« Reply #47 on: January 24, 2010, 12:21:22 am »
0
I'm not sure, I think that the highest SAC mark is linked with the highest exam mark during moderation. That doesn't make sense in your case (nor in my school's case this year) as the highest SAC mark student wasn't awarded the highest study score.
Raw Scores:
Psychology 50 | Mathematical Methods 49 | Further Mathematics 49 | Accounting 49 | Chemistry 44 | English 43
ATAR: 99.75

Akirus

  • Guest
Re: Maths Methods Roll Call 2010
« Reply #48 on: January 24, 2010, 12:30:53 am »
0
I'm not sure, I think that the highest SAC mark is linked with the highest exam mark during moderation. That doesn't make sense in your case (nor in my school's case this year) as the highest SAC mark student wasn't awarded the highest study score.

Going by your assumption that the highest SAC mark is linked with the highest exam mark, I don't see why the highest internally ranked student would necessarily get the highest study score.

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Maths Methods Roll Call 2010
« Reply #49 on: January 24, 2010, 12:33:06 am »
0
I'm not sure, I think that the highest SAC mark is linked with the highest exam mark during moderation. That doesn't make sense in your case (nor in my school's case this year) as the highest SAC mark student wasn't awarded the highest study score.

Going by your assumption that the highest SAC mark is linked with the highest exam mark, I don't see why the highest internally ranked student would necessarily get the highest study score.

That is correct.  The  highest SAC mark is linked with the highest exam mark.

Edit:  Have a read of this:
http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,21499.0.html
« Last Edit: January 24, 2010, 12:35:05 am by stonecold »
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

Blakhitman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1954
  • Respect: +7
Re: Maths Methods Roll Call 2010
« Reply #50 on: January 24, 2010, 12:35:33 am »
0


Anyone else using Heinemann VCE zone? I think it's a good book, but from what I've been reading Essentials is the best, I'm thinking of buying that too, do people think it's worth the trouble?

Just get the PDF and do questions from it when you have time.

Yeah good idea, wouldn't happen to know where I could get a copy?

Akirus

  • Guest
Re: Maths Methods Roll Call 2010
« Reply #51 on: January 24, 2010, 12:41:17 am »
0


Anyone else using Heinemann VCE zone? I think it's a good book, but from what I've been reading Essentials is the best, I'm thinking of buying that too, do people think it's worth the trouble?

Just get the PDF and do questions from it when you have time.

Yeah good idea, wouldn't happen to know where I could get a copy?

I'm sure you could find it if you dig around the Methods forum.

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Maths Methods Roll Call 2010
« Reply #52 on: January 24, 2010, 12:44:14 am »
0
I think SACs matter when you're looking at high 40s.

I dunno >.<

My friend came up with this hypothesis, that because the number 1 SAC guy at our school ended up only getting low 40's, he pulled the whole cohort's SSs down. I wonder if such a notion is valid.

It may have a little, because the person raked 1st will get the best SAC mark out of the whole cohort, unless two people got the same top exam mark, then the two top ranked SAC students would have got the best moderated SAC marks.

Are you taking into account the year 12 students at your school kyzoo, because they would have been apart of your cohort, and I pretty certain there was at least one 50 (if not more) in methods from your school last year.
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

Studyinghard

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1313
  • Respect: +4
Re: Maths Methods Roll Call 2010
« Reply #53 on: January 24, 2010, 12:47:20 am »
0
hoping for 40+ raw aswell. or very high 30's.

one step at a time is what I say.  :)
"Your life is like a river, no matter what you just got to keep on going"

Blakhitman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1954
  • Respect: +7
Re: Maths Methods Roll Call 2010
« Reply #54 on: January 24, 2010, 12:48:36 am »
0


Anyone else using Heinemann VCE zone? I think it's a good book, but from what I've been reading Essentials is the best, I'm thinking of buying that too, do people think it's worth the trouble?

Just get the PDF and do questions from it when you have time.

Yeah good idea, wouldn't happen to know where I could get a copy?

I'm sure you could find it if you dig around the Methods forum.

OMG I love this place...Thank you :)

kyzoo

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2040
  • Respect: +23
Re: Maths Methods Roll Call 2010
« Reply #55 on: January 24, 2010, 01:14:14 am »
0
Are you taking into account the year 12 students at your school kyzoo, because they would have been apart of your cohort, and I pretty certain there was at least one 50 (if not more) in methods from your school last year.

=/ I have no idea about Y12s, all I know is that this person I am referring to got 98+ total for SACs which is high for our school considering many of our better students lost 2 or more marks (out of total 100 allocated to SACs) on the 2nd SAC.
2009
~ Methods (Non-CAS) [48 --> 49.4]

2010
~ Spesh [50 --> 51.6]
~ Physics [50 --> 50]
~ Chem [43 --> 46.5]
~ English [46 --> 46.2]
~ UMEP Maths [5.0]

2010 ATAR: 99.90
Aggregate 206.8

NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT ME ON EMAIL - [email protected] if you are looking for a swift reply.

EvangelionZeta

  • Quintessence of Dust
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • *******
  • Posts: 2435
  • Respect: +288
Re: Maths Methods Roll Call 2010
« Reply #56 on: January 24, 2010, 01:19:57 am »
0
I think SACs matter when you're looking at high 40s.

I dunno >.<

My friend came up with this hypothesis, that because the number 1 SAC guy at our school ended up only getting low 40's, he pulled the whole cohort's SSs down. I wonder if such a notion is valid.

That would make no sense, given that this year's results on the whole ranked as one of MGS' better years.
---

Finished VCE in 2010 and now teaching professionally. For any inquiries, email me at [email protected].

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Maths Methods Roll Call 2010
« Reply #57 on: January 24, 2010, 01:27:11 am »
0
Are you taking into account the year 12 students at your school kyzoo, because they would have been apart of your cohort, and I pretty certain there was at least one 50 (if not more) in methods from your school last year.

=/ I have no idea about Y12s, all I know is that this person I am referring to got 98+ total for SACs which is high for our school considering many of our better students lost 2 or more marks (out of total 100 allocated to SACs) on the 2nd SAC.

Okay, but the cohort refers to everyone in an entire school or institution who takes a specific subject in the same year, so although he may have been ranked highest in your class, he may not have necessarily been ranked the highest in the cohort.

And judging by the fact that others from your school did get 50's, I would say he wasn't ranked 1st for SAC's in your cohort.
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

Akirus

  • Guest
Re: Maths Methods Roll Call 2010
« Reply #58 on: January 24, 2010, 01:28:44 am »
0
It amuses me how the elite private schools can complain about poor cohort.

kyzoo

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2040
  • Respect: +23
Re: Maths Methods Roll Call 2010
« Reply #59 on: January 24, 2010, 01:31:14 am »
0
EZ: haha I have so far been totally unable to exhibit a holistic approach in perceiving school performance.

stonecold: it's true that he may not have necessarily been ranked the highest, but traditionally the 50 come from this class. So please excuse me for being unable to adopt an egalitarian view due to a perception stained by sense of tradition.

It amuses me how the elite private schools can complain about poor cohort.

Perhaps, again I have been unable to exhibit a holistic perception.
« Last Edit: January 24, 2010, 01:33:10 am by kyzoo »
2009
~ Methods (Non-CAS) [48 --> 49.4]

2010
~ Spesh [50 --> 51.6]
~ Physics [50 --> 50]
~ Chem [43 --> 46.5]
~ English [46 --> 46.2]
~ UMEP Maths [5.0]

2010 ATAR: 99.90
Aggregate 206.8

NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT ME ON EMAIL - [email protected] if you are looking for a swift reply.