A VCE "service" does not have to be a scam for it to be harmful to students. Time that they waste poring over his material to learn one tiny thing (and learning detrimental/confusing things) could be better spent on more productive avenues of study. Time is precious during VCE.
That's very true. I agree with you here, you are 100% right. But this is your opinion on the product. Maybe you dont like learning through this method, maybe you'd rather be tought some other way. But everybody learns differently, just because you didn't find it helpful doesnt mean others wont.
Also, my post is well protected under the defamation act, as I actually reviewed the product and my criticisms were backed up by substantive evidence and valid argument.
So wait, are you saying that if you had attended the other program which you posted a warning about (can't remember it's name), then you would have left it on the boards? That's just a question, not attacking you in that one. But then again, I know absolutely nothing about the law...
You have made your attack on me based on my position/reputation, yet you have failed to rebut any of my 10 points arguing for why the product is damaging/not worth a look.
Uhh, that's why I said that I agree that it's not perfect. I never said what you said was wrong, simply because what you said wasnt wrong. I don't know why you brought that up? But I am saying, in your position, and the extreme bias, as an observer, I didn't beleive your outright attack on this was needed. Your bias played a factor in you condemnation of Flushers product - and I didn't appreciate it.
Am I now not allowed to have an opinion, simply because I run this website and have founded a tuition company?
I'm not going to tell you if you're allowed to have an opinion or not. You make your own decisions. But when there is personal affiliations, peoples opinions seem to change, and that's what I've mentioned here. Am I wrong in doing so? Personal affiliations are very pwoerful and can mask your perception on reality - and thats why people shouldnt get involved if they were ment to be remain indifferent but have an affiliation. eg: that's why GPs, dentists, physios etc are told not to treat family members. Similarly, thats why if youre going for an interview and you know somebody on the board, you have to declare it [and in many many other cases where personal affiliation is expected to cause a bias and change or modify somebody's opinion. Am I wrong in pointing that out, enwiabe?
And then one has to wonder, why you've targeted only me, when there are myriad other posters (including global moderators if you want to go the autocratic + reputation route) who have posted things similar to me?
Mum, Josh also made the farting sound with his mouth, why are you only screaming at me....
Lastly, I want to point out that I don't think Flushers product is 100% perfect. I am indifferent towards the actual product. However, what I'm saying is, and I want to be very clear Enwiabe, I just beleive that your personal affiliation causes a bias on your attack of this product and personally I wanted to voice my opinion.