VTAC OFFERS (Class of 2009)

[Mollie]

Hey guys, what was the cut off for Engineering at Melbourne?

84.7 I think

...Right?  But my friend got an ENTER of 90, and it was her second preference and she got her third preference.
I don't understand how this could work.
Are you sure 84.7 wasn't fringe?  Because I seem to recall it not telling anybody what the clearly in was in the paper.
I remember a '-' in the column?

There are a couple of posters on the Whirlpool forum saying they got 90+ and didn't get into Melb engineering. One even claims he didn't get in with 94.25
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1361174&p=14

[Nelle]

I got Commerce/Law at Deakin Geelong!

Enter went up by 5 points from 85.3 to 90.10. When i went to the change of preference day they said it would only go up by one or two points.

Also quick question I have a friend who got a 95.65 and didn't get into her first preference: professional communications at RMIT, is there much chance she'll get into it in the other rounds?

[vexx]

I got Commerce/Law at Deakin Geelong!

Enter went up by 5 points from 85.3 to 90.10. When i went to the change of preference day they said it would only go up by one or two points.

Also quick question I have a friend who got a 95.65 and didn't get into her first preference: professional communications at RMIT, is there much chance she'll get into it in the other rounds?

no sorry, professional communication is ~97, but she can always transfer:)

[dejan91]

Hey guys, what was the cut off for Engineering at Melbourne?

84.7 I think

...Right?  But my friend got an ENTER of 90, and it was her second preference and she got her third preference.
I don't understand how this could work.
Are you sure 84.7 wasn't fringe?  Because I seem to recall it not telling anybody what the clearly in was in the paper.
I remember a '-' in the column?

There are a couple of posters on the Whirlpool forum saying they got 90+ and didn't get into Melb engineering. One even claims he didn't get in with 94.25
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1361174&p=14

My friend got in with high 80's (he had an underrepresented SEAS application though...)

[simpak]

Hey guys, what was the cut off for Engineering at Melbourne?

84.7 I think

...Right?  But my friend got an ENTER of 90, and it was her second preference and she got her third preference.
I don't understand how this could work.
Are you sure 84.7 wasn't fringe?  Because I seem to recall it not telling anybody what the clearly in was in the paper.
I remember a '-' in the column?

There are a couple of posters on the Whirlpool forum saying they got 90+ and didn't get into Melb engineering. One even claims he didn't get in with 94.25
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1361174&p=14

That's pretty insane considering last years ENTER.

[jayfan]

BBiomed at UoM!! 

a quick question: what does "fringe ENTER" mean? cheers

[Peedles]

Science at Melbourne Uni.. I think i've finally gotten over biomedicine now 

[vexx]

BBiomed at UoM!! 

a quick question: what does "fringe ENTER" mean? cheers

it is enter score that 90% or 95% got on or above.

[simonhu81292]

Science at Melbourne Uni.. I think i've finally gotten over biomedicine now 

you will find your way out . .  :smitten:
 

[Akirus]

Science at Melbourne Uni.. I think i've finally gotten over biomedicine now 

Out of curiosity, what difference does it make?

[Flaming_Arrow]

my friend got into biomed and he had 91 enter

[RainerWolfram]

a quick question: what does "fringe ENTER" mean? cheers

This thread will help you understand

http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,20858.0.html

[Mxbn0]

Hey guys, what was the cut off for Engineering at Melbourne?

84.7 I think

...Right?  But my friend got an ENTER of 90, and it was her second preference and she got her third preference.
I don't understand how this could work.
Are you sure 84.7 wasn't fringe?  Because I seem to recall it not telling anybody what the clearly in was in the paper.
I remember a '-' in the column?

There are a couple of posters on the Whirlpool forum saying they got 90+ and didn't get into Melb engineering. One even claims he didn't get in with 94.25
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1361174&p=14

That's pretty insane considering last years ENTER.

I'm another one who didn't get in. I got science though :S It's silly that they say the clearly in is going to be 85, yet thats a whole 10 points off. Why would they even say that if they have no clue? lol

[Akirus]

Hey guys, what was the cut off for Engineering at Melbourne?

84.7 I think

...Right?  But my friend got an ENTER of 90, and it was her second preference and she got her third preference.
I don't understand how this could work.
Are you sure 84.7 wasn't fringe?  Because I seem to recall it not telling anybody what the clearly in was in the paper.
I remember a '-' in the column?

There are a couple of posters on the Whirlpool forum saying they got 90+ and didn't get into Melb engineering. One even claims he didn't get in with 94.25
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1361174&p=14

That's pretty insane considering last years ENTER.

I'm another one who didn't get in. I got science though :S It's silly that they say the clearly in is going to be 85, yet thats a whole 10 points off. Why would they even say that if they have no clue? lol

85 would be the clearly-in for the previous year and at most it should be used as an indicator, not as a guarantee that the score will get you into the course.

[Mxbn0]

Hey guys, what was the cut off for Engineering at Melbourne?

84.7 I think

...Right?  But my friend got an ENTER of 90, and it was her second preference and she got her third preference.
I don't understand how this could work.
Are you sure 84.7 wasn't fringe?  Because I seem to recall it not telling anybody what the clearly in was in the paper.
I remember a '-' in the column?

There are a couple of posters on the Whirlpool forum saying they got 90+ and didn't get into Melb engineering. One even claims he didn't get in with 94.25
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1361174&p=14

That's pretty insane considering last years ENTER.

I'm another one who didn't get in. I got science though :S It's silly that they say the clearly in is going to be 85, yet thats a whole 10 points off. Why would they even say that if they have no clue? lol

85 would be the clearly-in for the previous year and at most it should be used as an indicator, not as a guarantee that the score will get you into the course.

Yeah, an indicator, but if I needed a 95, then why even bother having it?