Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

May 19, 2026, 11:40:07 am

Author Topic: cipher's question thread  (Read 2313 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

cipherpol

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 282
  • Respect: +3
cipher's question thread
« on: January 21, 2010, 11:09:33 pm »
0
Alright, let's start.

Solve for x algebraically

,
2009: Biology
2010: Eng Lang, Chem, Physics, Methods, Spesh

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: cipher's question thread
« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2010, 11:11:25 pm »
0
This question requires a bit of ingenuity.





Remind you of any compound angle formulas?



You could have squared both sides and simplify etc, but I like wishful thinking more.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

moekamo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 275
  • Respect: +4
Re: cipher's question thread
« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2010, 11:13:43 pm »
0
square both sides:



so since

therefore:

or

you can do the rest :)
2nd Year BSc/BEng @ Monash

cipherpol

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 282
  • Respect: +3
Re: cipher's question thread
« Reply #3 on: January 21, 2010, 11:14:45 pm »
0
T.T, I tried squaring both sides and ended up with , which gave the wrong solutions.
2009: Biology
2010: Eng Lang, Chem, Physics, Methods, Spesh

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: cipher's question thread
« Reply #4 on: January 21, 2010, 11:14:55 pm »
0
square both sides:



so since

therefore:

or

you can do the rest :)
There is only one problem with squaring, it produces redundant solutions. Which is why avoid it if you can, try other ways.

SO DON'T FORGET TO SUB IN VALUES AT THE END TO CHECK VALIDITY!!!
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

cipherpol

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 282
  • Respect: +3
Re: cipher's question thread
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2010, 12:31:24 am »
0
Thanks TT, worked perfectly :)

Next question;

for b.) would I use a formula like ?
2009: Biology
2010: Eng Lang, Chem, Physics, Methods, Spesh

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: cipher's question thread
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2010, 12:36:34 am »
0



PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

cipherpol

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 282
  • Respect: +3
Re: cipher's question thread
« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2010, 01:25:34 am »
0
xD, reason I kept getting that last question wrong was cause I was subbing in values from previous answer :uglystupid2:

Last question before moving onto complex numbers!

2009: Biology
2010: Eng Lang, Chem, Physics, Methods, Spesh

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: cipher's question thread
« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2010, 01:35:39 am »
0
Let be radius of circle.







PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

cipherpol

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 282
  • Respect: +3
Re: cipher's question thread
« Reply #9 on: January 28, 2010, 03:44:30 pm »
0
For the next question, so far:





How do I prove they're collinear?

Thanks.
2009: Biology
2010: Eng Lang, Chem, Physics, Methods, Spesh

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: cipher's question thread
« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2010, 03:47:46 pm »
0
I think it's
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

cipherpol

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 282
  • Respect: +3
Re: cipher's question thread
« Reply #11 on: January 28, 2010, 03:50:54 pm »
0
Don't you multiply by the conjugate of ?
2009: Biology
2010: Eng Lang, Chem, Physics, Methods, Spesh

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: cipher's question thread
« Reply #12 on: January 28, 2010, 03:53:30 pm »
0
It's 1 over the conjugate of z :P
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

cipherpol

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 282
  • Respect: +3
Re: cipher's question thread
« Reply #13 on: January 28, 2010, 03:53:51 pm »
0
omfg, can't believe i didn't see that.
2009: Biology
2010: Eng Lang, Chem, Physics, Methods, Spesh

cipherpol

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 282
  • Respect: +3
Re: cipher's question thread
« Reply #14 on: January 29, 2010, 01:46:12 am »
0
Differentiate

Answer says , but I dunno how to get the 6 on top.
2009: Biology
2010: Eng Lang, Chem, Physics, Methods, Spesh