My hypothesis is that you overworked, to the point where you were continuously stressed, and your mind was fatigued for the exams. You should never work to the point of being tortured by stress; it should never be painful to get yourself to work some more, it should be engaging at all times.
And this reminds me of the Learn More, Study Less book I posted awhile ago
http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,21921.0.htmlAccording to book, you overkilled the "acquiring" step of learning. But your score indicates that you were lacking in "exploration of understanding." Check it out if you're interested.
Some other suggestions~ Did you do your practice exams
in one sitting and exam condition with no distractions?
The way you say "answer exams," it sounds as if you treated the exams as if they were textbook questions.
~ From the looks of it, you just did everything that you could, you didn't attempt to maximize the efficiency of your study. You didn't evaluate what was useful and what was not, and as such
failed to omit useless tasks, leading to much wasted time. There's no way you can do that much for 4-6 subjects in Y12, and not everything that you can do will necessarily be useful or worth your time.
Know that you can't do everything, and that you need to choose wisely.~ From what I can tell, you didn't establish a specific procedure for dealing with the exam; neither did you identify your weakpoints. When you say "answer all incorrect accounting questions ever," that's great but you should go further. You should find common mistakes, and then develop methods to
prevent the same mistake from happening twice.
~ "Discussed accounting theory with an accountant"...this is redundant. It's fine if it was a random, opportunistic thing, but if you specifically arranged to see an accountant for this, then that's just a waste of time.
~ For exam nerves, simple breathing exercises will do. You don't need confidence, you just need a blank, relaxed mind.
~ Now that I think about it, you rely on
rote memorization FAR TOO MUCH. Recite Checkpoints theory? Reading textbooks 15+ times? Playing audio tapes to yourself regularly? Revising everything on a daily basis?
The trademark of good learning is
understanding with minimal repetition. Instead of maximum exposure to maximum sources, you should develop as deep an understanding as possible using a single textbook and your teacher.
This does NOT involve repetition. It involves conceiving analogies and metaphors, finding connections between the theory concepts and any other concept familiar to you, being able to explain the concepts to a 5-year old such that he/she understands, being able to derive formulas and concepts from first principles, questioning everything, and the list goes on.
Furthermore your study sessions should
NEVER be exact repeats .
Your understanding should expand EVERY SINGLE session, if not, then you are just wasting your time.
----
PS: I'm assuming that Methods is similar enough to Accounting for my suggestions to be valid.
PSS: You have shattered my beliefs regarding the amount of work that one can do for a single subject.
PSSS: Seeing as though you seem to rely on rote memorization, you should definitely read Learn More, Study Less. It explains why
rote memorization is ineffective.PSSSS: I got carried away and spent half an hour on this at 2:30 in the morning >.<. And since I wrote this over such a long time, my feelings change from the start to the end. And my sleep habits are screwed.