Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 15, 2025, 06:51:16 pm

Author Topic: the.watchman's weird q's thread  (Read 1071 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

the.watchman

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2526
  • Respect: +10
the.watchman's weird q's thread
« on: February 05, 2010, 06:47:53 am »
0
I've got this question where we need to find the answer but not give working, so logically, it is quite possible to find.
However, I felt like proving it, but I got a little stuck.
(I'm using an induction method, if there's something better out there, then please tell me!)

Prove that , where 999...9 denotes n digits of 9 (so 1999...9 has n+1 digits)

Evidently

When , ,

So , the equation holds for

Assume that the equation is true for ,



I'm having trouble then with finding a way to sub the n=k equation into the n=k+1 equation
Can someone help me with that, or is there a better way of doing this???
Thanks!
« Last Edit: February 05, 2010, 06:51:48 am by the.watchman »
Remember, remember the 5th of November

2010 - MM CAS (47) - Cisco 1+2 (pass :P)
2011 - Eng - Phys - Chem - Spesh - Latin - UMAT
ATAR - 99.00+ plz... :)

Feel free to PM me for anything :D

Neobeo

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 188
  • 反逆 の Neobeo
  • Respect: +3
Re: the.watchman's weird q's thread
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2010, 06:53:46 am »
0
Let
Mathematics Coach: Tuition and Enrichment // Email/MSN:

If you remember the flying birds, they died D=

the.watchman

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2526
  • Respect: +10
Re: the.watchman's weird q's thread
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2010, 07:03:48 am »
0
Let

Grrr ... why didn't I think of that!
Thanks! Now to prove...
Remember, remember the 5th of November

2010 - MM CAS (47) - Cisco 1+2 (pass :P)
2011 - Eng - Phys - Chem - Spesh - Latin - UMAT
ATAR - 99.00+ plz... :)

Feel free to PM me for anything :D

the.watchman

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2526
  • Respect: +10
Re: the.watchman's weird q's thread
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2010, 07:11:05 am »
0
Gee... that turns the proof into three steps...
Thanks heaps Neobeo!
I'm such an idiot...
Remember, remember the 5th of November

2010 - MM CAS (47) - Cisco 1+2 (pass :P)
2011 - Eng - Phys - Chem - Spesh - Latin - UMAT
ATAR - 99.00+ plz... :)

Feel free to PM me for anything :D