Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 16, 2026, 10:52:38 pm

Author Topic: Identically equal to?  (Read 3612 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

m@tty

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4324
  • Respect: +33
  • School: Heatherton Christian College
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Identically equal to?
« on: February 16, 2010, 07:01:57 pm »
0
When do we need to use the "identically equal to" sign in favour of a normal equal sign? Does it only apply when creating partial fractions? And is it even necessary to use then?

Thanks
2009/2010: Mathematical Methods(non-CAS) ; Business Management | English ; Literature - Physics ; Chemistry - Specialist Mathematics ; MUEP Maths

96.85

2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering and Bachelor of Science, Monash University

2015-____: To infinity and beyond.

m@tty

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4324
  • Respect: +33
  • School: Heatherton Christian College
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Identically equal to?
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2010, 07:22:55 pm »
0
I don't know, maybe it is equivalent. It is used when creating partial fractions in the MathsQuest Specialist book.
Eg.


Then do the same to find A, hence splitting the fraction. That's the only place I've seen it used.
2009/2010: Mathematical Methods(non-CAS) ; Business Management | English ; Literature - Physics ; Chemistry - Specialist Mathematics ; MUEP Maths

96.85

2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering and Bachelor of Science, Monash University

2015-____: To infinity and beyond.

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Identically equal to?
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2010, 07:48:52 pm »
0
What this means is equal to IN EVERY CASE.

Because you can reduce P(x) to:
P(x) = A(x-b) + B(x-a) plugging in the points "b" and "a" into this equation and getting a solution is valid. Whereas if you plugged this into the original equation, then this would cause the universe to explode - that is, divide by zero.
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

QuantumJG

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1748
  • Applied Mathematics Student at UoM
  • Respect: +82
Re: Identically equal to?
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2010, 07:54:30 pm »
0
When do we need to use the "identically equal to" sign in favour of a normal equal sign? Does it only apply when creating partial fractions? And is it even necessary to use then?

Thanks

Doesn't '' mean equivalent to?

According to wikapedia '' is the same as '~', is this true?
« Last Edit: February 16, 2010, 07:56:21 pm by QuantumJG »
2008: Finished VCE

2009 - 2011: Bachelor of Science (Mathematical Physics)

2012 - 2014: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics/Mathematical Physics)

2016 - 2018: Master of Engineering (Civil)

Semester 1:[/b] Engineering Mechanics, Fluid Mechanics, Engineering Risk Analysis, Sustainable Infrastructure Engineering

Semester 2:[/b] Earth Processes for Engineering, Engineering Materials, Structural Theory and Design, Systems Modelling and Design

the.watchman

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2526
  • Respect: +10
Re: Identically equal to?
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2010, 08:41:05 pm »
0
This symbol can also be used for congruence (both geometric and mathematical congruence).
Remember, remember the 5th of November

2010 - MM CAS (47) - Cisco 1+2 (pass :P)
2011 - Eng - Phys - Chem - Spesh - Latin - UMAT
ATAR - 99.00+ plz... :)

Feel free to PM me for anything :D

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Identically equal to?
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2010, 08:41:31 pm »
0
Use it in modular arithmetic.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.