Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 01, 2025, 09:34:56 pm

Author Topic: TyErd's questions  (Read 42765 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TyErd

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1024
  • Respect: +1
Re: TyErd's questions
« Reply #150 on: May 03, 2010, 04:50:24 pm »
0
For the graph of   the subset of R for which the gradient is negative is given by the interval........?
"Don’t ever let somebody tell you you can’t do something, not even me.  Alright?  You got a dream, you gotta protect it.  People can’t do something themselves, they wanna tell you you can’t do it.  If you want something, go get it, period." - Chris Gardner

TyErd

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1024
  • Respect: +1
Re: TyErd's questions
« Reply #151 on: May 03, 2010, 04:56:03 pm »
0
Differentiate . What are the steps to differentiating a modulus function.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2010, 04:58:59 pm by TyErd »
"Don’t ever let somebody tell you you can’t do something, not even me.  Alright?  You got a dream, you gotta protect it.  People can’t do something themselves, they wanna tell you you can’t do it.  If you want something, go get it, period." - Chris Gardner

the.watchman

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2526
  • Respect: +10
Re: TyErd's questions
« Reply #152 on: May 03, 2010, 05:05:49 pm »
0
Differentiate . What are the steps to differentiating a modulus function.

You can use a chain rule approach, or this:

When the inside of the mod is positive (eg. when ), then the derivative is [2x-4]'

When the inside of the mod is positive (eg. when ), then f(x) becomes -2x-4, so the derivative is [-2x-4]'

Hence the derivative can be written as a hybrid function according to the above
Remember, remember the 5th of November

2010 - MM CAS (47) - Cisco 1+2 (pass :P)
2011 - Eng - Phys - Chem - Spesh - Latin - UMAT
ATAR - 99.00+ plz... :)

Feel free to PM me for anything :D

the.watchman

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2526
  • Respect: +10
Re: TyErd's questions
« Reply #153 on: May 03, 2010, 05:08:58 pm »
0
For the graph of   the subset of R for which the gradient is negative is given by the interval........?

Well, first off,

For the question,

So





Solve either graphically or algebraically to get:

Remember, remember the 5th of November

2010 - MM CAS (47) - Cisco 1+2 (pass :P)
2011 - Eng - Phys - Chem - Spesh - Latin - UMAT
ATAR - 99.00+ plz... :)

Feel free to PM me for anything :D

TyErd

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1024
  • Respect: +1
Re: TyErd's questions
« Reply #154 on: May 03, 2010, 05:15:05 pm »
0
For the graph of   the subset of R for which the gradient is negative is given by the interval........?

Well, first off,

For the question,

So





Solve either graphically or algebraically to get:



okay I get that part except how come when i solve algebraicaly i get x<-5. When i do it graphically i get it right.
and the modulus one im still very confused
"Don’t ever let somebody tell you you can’t do something, not even me.  Alright?  You got a dream, you gotta protect it.  People can’t do something themselves, they wanna tell you you can’t do it.  If you want something, go get it, period." - Chris Gardner

m@tty

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4324
  • Respect: +33
  • School: Heatherton Christian College
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: TyErd's questions
« Reply #155 on: May 03, 2010, 05:35:09 pm »
0


Or you can say



The piece wise defined function is much easier to differentiate. As you don't have to use the chain rule twice...



NOTE: There is no value for the derivative at .



EDIT: The other method goes like this... (I stupidly used this method in the exam last year and lost a mark.. :( )



where

You could 'officially' use the chain rule again as in write it down on paper, or you could just do it quickly in your head.



and



So .

And
(This is because they are always both the same magnitude, and the denominator is always positive, so the sign is determined by the sign of the numerator, which is positive where and negative where )

Hence .
« Last Edit: May 03, 2010, 05:51:56 pm by m@tty »
2009/2010: Mathematical Methods(non-CAS) ; Business Management | English ; Literature - Physics ; Chemistry - Specialist Mathematics ; MUEP Maths

96.85

2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering and Bachelor of Science, Monash University

2015-____: To infinity and beyond.

TyErd

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1024
  • Respect: +1
Re: TyErd's questions
« Reply #156 on: May 03, 2010, 05:37:19 pm »
0
thankyou! i get it now
"Don’t ever let somebody tell you you can’t do something, not even me.  Alright?  You got a dream, you gotta protect it.  People can’t do something themselves, they wanna tell you you can’t do it.  If you want something, go get it, period." - Chris Gardner

the.watchman

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2526
  • Respect: +10
Re: TyErd's questions
« Reply #157 on: May 03, 2010, 05:49:37 pm »
0
Algebraic is more complicated than you think, there are two cases to consider

CASE 1:
(2x-1)>0 AND (x+5)<0 (pos. times neg. = neg.)

CASE 2:
(2x-1)<0 AND (x+5)>0 (neg. times pos. = neg.)

Try it from there!



Or you can say



The piece wise defined function is much easier to differentiate. As you don't have to use the chain rule twice...



BUT the function is not differentiable at x=2 (for the derivative, pos and neg limits different)
Remember, remember the 5th of November

2010 - MM CAS (47) - Cisco 1+2 (pass :P)
2011 - Eng - Phys - Chem - Spesh - Latin - UMAT
ATAR - 99.00+ plz... :)

Feel free to PM me for anything :D

m@tty

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4324
  • Respect: +33
  • School: Heatherton Christian College
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: TyErd's questions
« Reply #158 on: May 03, 2010, 05:50:31 pm »
0
BUT the function is not differentiable at x=-2 (for the derivative, pos and neg limits different)

YEAH I fixed that up. Thanks.
2009/2010: Mathematical Methods(non-CAS) ; Business Management | English ; Literature - Physics ; Chemistry - Specialist Mathematics ; MUEP Maths

96.85

2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering and Bachelor of Science, Monash University

2015-____: To infinity and beyond.

TyErd

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1024
  • Respect: +1
Re: TyErd's questions
« Reply #159 on: May 03, 2010, 06:16:22 pm »
0
why is there no value  for the derivative at x=-2
"Don’t ever let somebody tell you you can’t do something, not even me.  Alright?  You got a dream, you gotta protect it.  People can’t do something themselves, they wanna tell you you can’t do it.  If you want something, go get it, period." - Chris Gardner

ZachCharge

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 560
  • Eh...
  • Respect: +3
Re: TyErd's questions
« Reply #160 on: May 03, 2010, 06:25:17 pm »
0
why is there no value  for the derivative at x=-2
At x=-2 the function is at a cusp, which are impossible to get the gradient function of.
Hmm...next year already. Well better set my goals and all...(raw)
Methods CAS [35] Further [42] English [33-5ish?] Lit [35] Revolutions [Ehhh]

TyErd

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1024
  • Respect: +1
Re: TyErd's questions
« Reply #161 on: May 03, 2010, 06:37:40 pm »
0


Or you can say



The piece wise defined function is much easier to differentiate. As you don't have to use the chain rule twice...



NOTE: There is no value for the derivative at .



What happened to to the greater than or equal too symbol. Why did you make it just greater than -2?
"Don’t ever let somebody tell you you can’t do something, not even me.  Alright?  You got a dream, you gotta protect it.  People can’t do something themselves, they wanna tell you you can’t do it.  If you want something, go get it, period." - Chris Gardner

Potter

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 148
  • Respect: +1
Re: TyErd's questions
« Reply #162 on: May 03, 2010, 07:16:44 pm »
0
Hey guys,

Sorry TyErd for crashing your thread, but I didn't really see the point of making a new thread.

Had a sac last week and my friend and I are in a disagreement with what is right.. Just thought you guys might be able to help.
So, here we go.

y=e^(x+2) is translated 3 units to the right

So, y=e^(x-1)

The next question asked us if the graph is reflected in the y axis, what is the new equation?

Is it y=e^(-x-1)

OR

y=e^-(x-1)

Thanks guys.
2009-  IT: Applications [40]

2010- English | Specialist | Methods | Chem | MUEP Chem |

2011- ...Lets see where this road will take me.

TyErd

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1024
  • Respect: +1
Re: TyErd's questions
« Reply #163 on: May 03, 2010, 07:20:09 pm »
0
"Don’t ever let somebody tell you you can’t do something, not even me.  Alright?  You got a dream, you gotta protect it.  People can’t do something themselves, they wanna tell you you can’t do it.  If you want something, go get it, period." - Chris Gardner

m@tty

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4324
  • Respect: +33
  • School: Heatherton Christian College
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: TyErd's questions
« Reply #164 on: May 03, 2010, 07:21:11 pm »
0
As said above, there is no value for the derivative at x=-2, as there is a cusp. At a cusp you don't have one value for the gradient at this point, you can draw more than one tangent. Or, more correctly, the left and right hand limits are not equal.

let

To find the gradient using first principles you take the limit:



And for this limit to exist, the left and right hand limits must be equal.

Firstly, the left hand limit:





(as )



And the right hand limit:





As these limits are not equal, the derivative is not defined at this point, .
« Last Edit: May 03, 2010, 07:24:31 pm by m@tty »
2009/2010: Mathematical Methods(non-CAS) ; Business Management | English ; Literature - Physics ; Chemistry - Specialist Mathematics ; MUEP Maths

96.85

2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering and Bachelor of Science, Monash University

2015-____: To infinity and beyond.