Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 07:23:57 pm

Author Topic: Intergration + algebra  (Read 998 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Chavi

  • sober since 1992
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1413
  • "Death to the juice"
  • Respect: +5
Intergration + algebra
« on: May 16, 2010, 05:55:43 pm »
0
Can I please get some help with the following questions:
1. Differentiate

Hence evaluate:

2) Let   where
a) Express in terms of n
b) Hence show that

Thanks in advance!
2009: Math Methods CAS [48]
2010: English [47]|Specialist Maths[44]|Physics[42]|Hebrew[37]|Accounting[48]  atar: 99.80
My blog: http://diasporism.wordpress.com/

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: Intergration + algebra
« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2010, 06:25:48 pm »
0
That looks hardcore..

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Intergration + algebra
« Reply #2 on: May 16, 2010, 06:51:18 pm »
0
Eh it is madly, madly hardcore.


Ok so we start with
Via product/chain rule. Trying to get it all in terms of cos's.








Integrate all sides.


SO finally

I put it in this form because after playing with it, its easier to let n = -2.

Now:



When crunched gets

FINALLY

IF THIS IS WRONG I WILL HARM SOMEBODY IN MY NEAR VICINITY!!!! (working on question 2 now)



edit: Is it meant to be ? otherwise, I don't know how to do n-2 without an n in there somewhere  :o
« Last Edit: May 16, 2010, 06:56:12 pm by Martoman »
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

Cthulhu

  • Guest
Re: Intergration + algebra
« Reply #3 on: May 16, 2010, 07:03:38 pm »
0
edit: Is it meant to be ? otherwise, I don't know how to do n-2 without an n in there somewhere  :o
This has me stumped too.

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Intergration + algebra
« Reply #4 on: May 16, 2010, 07:05:25 pm »
0
Yeah i'm certain it has to be otherwise wtf?
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

Cthulhu

  • Guest
Re: Intergration + algebra
« Reply #5 on: May 16, 2010, 07:17:31 pm »
0
Unless its

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Intergration + algebra
« Reply #6 on: May 16, 2010, 07:19:20 pm »
0
Yeah i'm certain it has to be otherwise wtf?

Ok asuming that is the case it becomes quite elegant.



In factorising, take out the lowest power, as always.




Awesome substitution tells us that so

ooooo so

=

Second part requires a bit of creativity, i'll leave this for you to do unless you really want me to.

Hint as we just worked out. This seems obvious but you need to be aware of this fully to work out the second part. And it does in fact work out to what you say.

So  DEFINATELY there i a typo there. It has to be not
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

Chavi

  • sober since 1992
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1413
  • "Death to the juice"
  • Respect: +5
Re: Intergration + algebra
« Reply #7 on: May 16, 2010, 10:14:39 pm »
0
Thanks Martoman. That was def a typo with tan.
Now How The F do you add Karma??
lol
2009: Math Methods CAS [48]
2010: English [47]|Specialist Maths[44]|Physics[42]|Hebrew[37]|Accounting[48]  atar: 99.80
My blog: http://diasporism.wordpress.com/

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Intergration + algebra
« Reply #8 on: May 16, 2010, 10:29:43 pm »
0
u need 50 posts :D
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

theuncle

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 36
  • Respect: +1
Re: Intergration + algebra
« Reply #9 on: May 17, 2010, 08:41:12 pm »
0
The original differentiation can be made simpler by doing some rearranging



Chavi

  • sober since 1992
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1413
  • "Death to the juice"
  • Respect: +5
Re: Intergration + algebra
« Reply #10 on: May 17, 2010, 09:55:43 pm »
0
u need 50 posts :D

i meant to give martoman karma
2009: Math Methods CAS [48]
2010: English [47]|Specialist Maths[44]|Physics[42]|Hebrew[37]|Accounting[48]  atar: 99.80
My blog: http://diasporism.wordpress.com/

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Intergration + algebra
« Reply #11 on: May 17, 2010, 10:41:47 pm »
0
 ::) one more...
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time