Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

June 15, 2025, 05:26:48 pm

Author Topic: Relating chemical shifts  (Read 1633 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Relating chemical shifts
« on: June 08, 2010, 11:26:35 pm »
0
Just checking.

Increase in chemical shift means less magnetic field is required???

How does this make sense because the more down field the more shielded so the more you need to penetrate no? Not the other way round?
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

olly_s15

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 477
  • Respect: +4
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2010, 11:28:40 pm »
0
Just checking.

Increase in chemical shift means less magnetic field is required???

How does this make sense because the more down field the more shielded so the more you need to penetrate no? Not the other way round?

Chemical shift is inversely proportional to the energy required to bring to resonance. More shielded requires more energy hence smaller chemical shift.
Science at UoM (Pharmacology/Neuroscience)
VCE 2010

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2010, 11:31:15 pm »
0
Yeah.............. consider COOH that is highly shielded yet is a HIGH chemical shift.
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

olly_s15

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 477
  • Respect: +4
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2010, 11:33:22 pm »
0
Yeah.............. consider COOH that is highly shielded yet is a HIGH chemical shift.

what makes you say its highly shielded?
Science at UoM (Pharmacology/Neuroscience)
VCE 2010

olly_s15

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 477
  • Respect: +4
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2010, 11:34:21 pm »
0
the electronegativiyt difference between O and H?

fair point

EDIT: hold on.... COOH isn't highly shielded - the neighbouring atom, O, is more electronegative hence weaker shield around the nucleus
« Last Edit: June 08, 2010, 11:35:56 pm by olly_s15 »
Science at UoM (Pharmacology/Neuroscience)
VCE 2010

kyzoo

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2040
  • Respect: +23
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #5 on: June 08, 2010, 11:37:10 pm »
0
I just think of it like this. In TMS the protons are very shielded. So the less shielding you get, the more different the proton environment is from TMS, and the more chemical shift you get.
2009
~ Methods (Non-CAS) [48 --> 49.4]

2010
~ Spesh [50 --> 51.6]
~ Physics [50 --> 50]
~ Chem [43 --> 46.5]
~ English [46 --> 46.2]
~ UMEP Maths [5.0]

2010 ATAR: 99.90
Aggregate 206.8

NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT ME ON EMAIL - [email protected] if you are looking for a swift reply.

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #6 on: June 08, 2010, 11:37:30 pm »
0
lol i just wiki'ed it. because of electronegativity it will steal all its electrons so less shielding.

Thanks.
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

olly_s15

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 477
  • Respect: +4
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2010, 11:38:53 pm »
0
lol i just wiki'ed it. because of electronegativity it will steal all its electrons so less shielding.

Thanks.

yes that is precisely what i was failing to coherently say
Science at UoM (Pharmacology/Neuroscience)
VCE 2010

cindyy

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 254
  • RAH RAH AH AH AH ROMA ROMAMA GAGA OOH LA LA
  • Respect: +1
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #8 on: June 08, 2010, 11:39:16 pm »
0
are we supposed to know this :S
2009: Chinese(SL), Psychology
2010: Biology, Chemistry, English Language, Further, Methods CAS

olly_s15

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 477
  • Respect: +4
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #9 on: June 08, 2010, 11:44:04 pm »
0
are we supposed to know this :S

no, not really. don't bother it's barely examinable
Science at UoM (Pharmacology/Neuroscience)
VCE 2010

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #10 on: June 08, 2010, 11:45:07 pm »
0
I just like to understand things cindyy and just realised that I didn't get this.

I now want something sadistic like: here is a chemical shift. Choosse the least and most shielded.

Also something like: define chemical shift.
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

olly_s15

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 477
  • Respect: +4
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #11 on: June 08, 2010, 11:45:47 pm »
0
I just like to understand things cindyy and just realised that I didn't get this.

I now want something sadistic like: here is a chemical shift. Choosse the least and most shielded.

Also something like: define chemical shift.

how would you define chemical shift?
Science at UoM (Pharmacology/Neuroscience)
VCE 2010

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #12 on: June 08, 2010, 11:46:30 pm »
0
difference in energy needed to change spin state
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

Studyinghard

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1313
  • Respect: +4
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #13 on: June 08, 2010, 11:47:14 pm »
0
I just like to understand things cindyy and just realised that I didn't get this.

I now want something sadistic like: here is a chemical shift. Choosse the least and most shielded.

Also something like: define chemical shift.

how would you define chemical shift?
Directly proportional to shielding by the electrons which depend on electronegativity. or is it inversely proportional :S
"Your life is like a river, no matter what you just got to keep on going"

olly_s15

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 477
  • Respect: +4
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Relating chemical shifts
« Reply #14 on: June 08, 2010, 11:48:28 pm »
0
I just like to understand things cindyy and just realised that I didn't get this.

I now want something sadistic like: here is a chemical shift. Choosse the least and most shielded.

Also something like: define chemical shift.

how would you define chemical shift?
Directly proportional to shielding by the electrons which depend on electronegativity. or is it inversely proportional :S

inversely - the more shielded, the less shift
Science at UoM (Pharmacology/Neuroscience)
VCE 2010