Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 19, 2025, 01:22:43 am

Author Topic: 2010 Psychology Exam 1 Discussion  (Read 64893 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

psych93

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 75
Re: 2010 Psychology Exam 1 Discussion
« Reply #420 on: June 09, 2010, 11:05:02 pm »
we never really learnt about split-brain patients and having impaired memory either
hence, why they should be taken off :)

minilunchbox

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1001
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: 2010 Psychology Exam 1 Discussion
« Reply #421 on: June 09, 2010, 11:07:22 pm »
we never really learnt about split-brain patients and having impaired memory either
hence, why they should be taken off :)

I know right. This isn't even mentioned in any text books (well none so far).
2011-13: Bachelor of Science (Pharmacology) @ University of Melbourne

extcar

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: 2010 Psychology Exam 1 Discussion
« Reply #422 on: June 09, 2010, 11:11:43 pm »
wtf what was the MC on the cones and rods in the cinemas, i dont remember that

Slumdawg

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1531
Re: 2010 Psychology Exam 1 Discussion
« Reply #423 on: June 09, 2010, 11:25:05 pm »
was it just me or was the ames room and the film director thing weird. Does a camera at a peephole eliminated binocular cues..???
Was the detail of the which and the whole storyline necessary I mean come on that was just a waste of ink. you could tell the exam writers were bored and thought that would be funny to put that in.
2010 ATAR: 98.35 - Psychology [50] Media Studies [47
2011-'13: Bachelor of Biomedicine [Neuroscience Major] at Melbourne Uni 
2014-'17: Doctor of Medicine (MD) at Melbourne Uni 


hawks08

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 163
Re: 2010 Psychology Exam 1 Discussion
« Reply #424 on: June 09, 2010, 11:30:52 pm »
was it just me or was the ames room and the film director thing weird. Does a camera at a peephole eliminated binocular cues..???
Was the detail of the which and the whole storyline necessary I mean come on that was just a waste of ink. you could tell the exam writers were bored and thought that would be funny to put that in.
exactly what ive been thinking. like they were writing a short story

coolhat

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 86
Re: 2010 Psychology Exam 1 Discussion
« Reply #425 on: June 09, 2010, 11:33:37 pm »
was it just me or was the ames room and the film director thing weird. Does a camera at a peephole eliminated binocular cues..???
Was the detail of the which and the whole storyline necessary I mean come on that was just a waste of ink. you could tell the exam writers were bored and thought that would be funny to put that in.

im pretty sure the location of the camera did not eliminate binocular depth cues. this is bcoz we view the camera film with both eyes-so binocular...i wrote that the camera location at the peephole ensured that our visual angle was the same for both corners, so we perceived the room as a rectangle.

hawks08

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 163
Re: 2010 Psychology Exam 1 Discussion
« Reply #426 on: June 09, 2010, 11:36:19 pm »
was it just me or was the ames room and the film director thing weird. Does a camera at a peephole eliminated binocular cues..???
Was the detail of the which and the whole storyline necessary I mean come on that was just a waste of ink. you could tell the exam writers were bored and thought that would be funny to put that in.
i think i wrote what i would have, if the camera wasnt mentioned. i the camera was just there to throw people of

im pretty sure the location of the camera did not eliminate binocular depth cues. this is bcoz we view the camera film with both eyes-so binocular...i wrote that the camera location at the peephole ensured that our visual angle was the same for both corners, so we perceived the room as a rectangle.

psych93

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 75
Re: 2010 Psychology Exam 1 Discussion
« Reply #427 on: June 09, 2010, 11:41:22 pm »
frankly I agree that examinors were secretly taking the piss
they must aim to purpose torture us students
last time I checked wewere being tested on OUR KNOWLEDGE of the content
not how well we can read between the lines and propose hypotheses for differnt explanations of the content in various contexts
*sighs* fml

minilunchbox

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1001
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: 2010 Psychology Exam 1 Discussion
« Reply #428 on: June 09, 2010, 11:49:37 pm »
But when you're watching a tv, there's no difference in your perception of what is on the screen whether you use both eyes or one eye. What you see on a tv is pretty much a series of images/frames which would be the same as a bunch of pictures that use pictorial depth cues to convey depth.
2011-13: Bachelor of Science (Pharmacology) @ University of Melbourne

rudaid

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 68
Re: 2010 Psychology Exam 1 Discussion
« Reply #429 on: June 10, 2010, 09:14:00 am »
yeah i wasn't sure, would the Ames room even work through a lens?

Tashi

  • Guest
Re: 2010 Psychology Exam 1 Discussion
« Reply #430 on: June 10, 2010, 01:43:51 pm »
yeah i wasn't sure, would the Ames room even work through a lens?

Yeah it would because it can only be monocularly viewed - you wouldn't even need a peephole! Only the correct positioning.

It's like those pictures of the people "pushing" the leaning tower of pisa over...

Hongld

  • Guest
Re: 2010 Psychology Exam 1 Discussion
« Reply #431 on: June 10, 2010, 01:48:37 pm »
I got psych exam, in the middle of scanning it atm

hawks08

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 163
Re: 2010 Psychology Exam 1 Discussion
« Reply #432 on: June 10, 2010, 02:31:53 pm »
I got psych exam, in the middle of scanning it atm
thanks now we can go over the answers in more detail

Hongld

  • Guest
Re: 2010 Psychology Exam 1 Discussion
« Reply #433 on: June 10, 2010, 02:38:39 pm »
I got psych exam, in the middle of scanning it atm
thanks now we can go over the answers in more detail

Oh just so everyone know, I posted the link on Exam upload forum

hawks08

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 163
Re: 2010 Psychology Exam 1 Discussion
« Reply #434 on: June 10, 2010, 02:48:14 pm »
i got
c
a
c
d
d
d
a
a
d
d
c
c
c
d
a
c
a
d
c
b(first b lol)
b
a
d
a
c
d
c
b
c
a
b
b
d
a
b
b
d
c
c
b(not that i remember doing this question :/)
a
a
c
a

what did you guys get?
« Last Edit: June 10, 2010, 05:25:19 pm by hawks08 »