Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 28, 2025, 07:00:05 am

Author Topic: 2010 Chem midyear - what did you think?  (Read 7605 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

chansthename

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 567
Re: 2010 Chem midyear - what did you think?
« Reply #30 on: June 09, 2010, 06:59:09 pm »
Way too easy. My silly mistakes will make me get an high A now... they should've made it a hard exam.

I walked out disheartened about the fact that mistakes are going to hurt real bad

scatteam_2

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 183
Re: 2010 Chem midyear - what did you think?
« Reply #31 on: June 09, 2010, 11:10:15 pm »
r u kidding?
i made so many mistakes its not even funny
i had no idea how to do biodiesel question
f**ked up big time

kyzoo

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2040
Re: 2010 Chem midyear - what did you think?
« Reply #32 on: June 09, 2010, 11:34:37 pm »
Mmm 3(mass of chlorine in insectiside sample), 5(total volume of gas produced), 15 (insulin), and 18(oxalic acid) were the only really tricky multiple choices ones
2009
~ Methods (Non-CAS) [48 --> 49.4]

2010
~ Spesh [50 --> 51.6]
~ Physics [50 --> 50]
~ Chem [43 --> 46.5]
~ English [46 --> 46.2]
~ UMEP Maths [5.0]

2010 ATAR: 99.90
Aggregate 206.8

NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT ME ON EMAIL - [email protected] if you are looking for a swift reply.

Blakhitman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1954
Re: 2010 Chem midyear - what did you think?
« Reply #33 on: June 09, 2010, 11:36:33 pm »
freaking got 5 wrong cause I'm a retard and 4 cause I couldn't be stuffed thinking too hard.

but yea lol MC was quite straight forward.

ey Kyzoo what you do for the concordant titres?

azn_dj

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 219
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: 2010 Chem midyear - what did you think?
« Reply #34 on: June 09, 2010, 11:40:35 pm »
Im really surprised that in the multi choice, they called it an amino
ESPECIALLY since they kicked a stink last year about it being an AMINE.
Make up your F****ING minds, VCAA!
2009: Biology
2010: Math Methods CAS, Specialist Maths, Chemistry, English.
2011: Bachelor of Commerce/Engineering Monash University Clayton.

English Teacher at Chambers Institute.
Privately tutoring Maths, Chemistry.

kyzoo

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2040
Re: 2010 Chem midyear - what did you think?
« Reply #35 on: June 09, 2010, 11:46:11 pm »
ey Kyzoo what you do for the concordant titres?

Mm I was taught that concordant titres are meant to be 0.1mL within each other, so that each titre taken into account is no more than a drop (0.05mL) away from the true titre required.
2009
~ Methods (Non-CAS) [48 --> 49.4]

2010
~ Spesh [50 --> 51.6]
~ Physics [50 --> 50]
~ Chem [43 --> 46.5]
~ English [46 --> 46.2]
~ UMEP Maths [5.0]

2010 ATAR: 99.90
Aggregate 206.8

NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT ME ON EMAIL - [email protected] if you are looking for a swift reply.

Blakhitman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1954
Re: 2010 Chem midyear - what did you think?
« Reply #36 on: June 09, 2010, 11:49:37 pm »
So you used 21.97, 21.99 and 22.03.

hmm ok well at least I got 3.82% xD

Akirus

  • Guest
Re: 2010 Chem midyear - what did you think?
« Reply #37 on: June 09, 2010, 11:51:15 pm »
I used 3 not because of +/-0.05mL, but because I recall that you're meant to use 3 concordant titres.

Blakhitman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1954
Re: 2010 Chem midyear - what did you think?
« Reply #38 on: June 09, 2010, 11:52:29 pm »
lol I was going to, but then I saw that they weren't "concordant (according to my definition)" so I didn't.

kayjay

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: 2010 Chem midyear - what did you think?
« Reply #39 on: June 10, 2010, 12:06:11 am »
Im really surprised that in the multi choice, they called it an amino
ESPECIALLY since they kicked a stink last year about it being an AMINE.
Make up your F****ING minds, VCAA!

how does that affect your decision making on the multi

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
Re: 2010 Chem midyear - what did you think?
« Reply #40 on: June 10, 2010, 02:15:09 pm »
Lol yea i was like wth! coz i was like yep that's and ester and that an amide........................wait wheres amine.....??? OHHH they called it amino...
« Last Edit: June 11, 2010, 11:37:49 am by kenhung123 »

Blakhitman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1954
Re: 2010 Chem midyear - what did you think?
« Reply #41 on: June 10, 2010, 04:36:57 pm »
you mean amine kenhung :P

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
Re: 2010 Chem midyear - what did you think?
« Reply #42 on: June 11, 2010, 11:37:20 am »
Yea sorry edited

chansthename

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 567
Re: 2010 Chem midyear - what did you think?
« Reply #43 on: June 16, 2010, 06:16:06 pm »
I used 3 not because of +/-0.05mL, but because I recall that you're meant to use 3 concordant titres.


same with me. I though 3 concordant titres so took the three closest to each other titires for my average.

rasangi

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: 2010 Chem midyear - what did you think?
« Reply #44 on: June 17, 2010, 07:03:38 pm »
i think A+ will be 90% +
A will be .. 80-90%
B+ 75-80
B 70-80

C+ ( average) about 65%
A+ is never above 90% no matter how easy the exam is, for science subjects anyway.