Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

March 06, 2026, 07:11:37 am

Author Topic: Reaction Shifting to maintain equilibrium  (Read 2357 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Reaction Shifting to maintain equilibrium
« on: June 19, 2010, 04:27:01 pm »
0
I am confused. So is it correct to say a reaction is in equilibrium?
Since reversible reactions can go both ways how do you exactly know which is reactants and products?
Is it just the way the reaction is positioned on the page?

Why is it that an exothermic reaction subjected to higher temperature would shift to the left (form reactants and reduce products)

fady_22

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 557
  • Respect: +5
Re: Reaction Shifting to maintain equilibrium
« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2010, 06:16:28 pm »
0
Yes, its the way that its written, i.e. reactants products.

An exothermic reaction releases energy in the form of heat (usually), and so an increase in temperature (according to Le Chatelier's Principle) will cause there to be a net backwards reaction (which would require energy, and so is endothermic) to oppose the effect of the increase in temp.
2009: Biology [46]
2010: Literature [44], Chemistry [50], Physics [46], Mathematical Methods CAS [46], Specialist Mathematics [42]

ATAR: 99.70

m@tty

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4324
  • Respect: +33
  • School: Heatherton Christian College
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Reaction Shifting to maintain equilibrium
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2010, 10:23:29 pm »
0
Yeah, extra heat = extra energy, then the endothermic reaction progresses to absorb the energy. This means that if you were talking about an exothermic reaction then a backwards reaction will occur.
2009/2010: Mathematical Methods(non-CAS) ; Business Management | English ; Literature - Physics ; Chemistry - Specialist Mathematics ; MUEP Maths

96.85

2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering and Bachelor of Science, Monash University

2015-____: To infinity and beyond.

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: Reaction Shifting to maintain equilibrium
« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2010, 11:45:55 pm »
0
You study way too much m@tty

Akirus

  • Guest
Re: Reaction Shifting to maintain equilibrium
« Reply #4 on: June 20, 2010, 02:58:06 am »
0
You study way too much m@tty

Funny hearing that coming from the guy that posts the most questions on this board.

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: Reaction Shifting to maintain equilibrium
« Reply #5 on: June 20, 2010, 11:19:41 am »
0
That just means I'm dumb lol

m@tty

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4324
  • Respect: +33
  • School: Heatherton Christian College
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Reaction Shifting to maintain equilibrium
« Reply #6 on: June 20, 2010, 12:47:48 pm »
0
You study way too much m@tty

Lol, I just skimmed A+ notes two nights ago..  Unit 4 seems sooooo small... =\
2009/2010: Mathematical Methods(non-CAS) ; Business Management | English ; Literature - Physics ; Chemistry - Specialist Mathematics ; MUEP Maths

96.85

2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering and Bachelor of Science, Monash University

2015-____: To infinity and beyond.

Blakhitman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1954
  • Respect: +7
Re: Reaction Shifting to maintain equilibrium
« Reply #7 on: June 20, 2010, 01:28:04 pm »
0
I should probably get some supplementary notes for chem and phys this time, they seem useful.

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: Reaction Shifting to maintain equilibrium
« Reply #8 on: June 20, 2010, 01:46:26 pm »
0
What do you mean supplementary notes??

Blakhitman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1954
  • Respect: +7
Re: Reaction Shifting to maintain equilibrium
« Reply #9 on: June 20, 2010, 03:44:51 pm »
0
A+ notes, Neap smartstudy.

Extra notes and books etc.

naved_s9994

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1412
  • Respect: +15
Re: Reaction Shifting to maintain equilibrium
« Reply #10 on: June 20, 2010, 04:48:29 pm »
0
Yes, its the way that its written, i.e. reactants products.

An exothermic reaction releases energy in the form of heat (usually), and so an increase in temperature (according to Le Chatelier's Principle) will cause there to be a net backwards reaction (which would require energy, and so is endothermic) to oppose the effect of the increase in temp.


I believe for an equilibrium reaction when one side of the equilibrium system is favoured, we use a two single headed arrows with a larger arm - indicating the side that is favoured.

------->
<---

'Keep you friends close, but keep your enemies closer'

shinny

  • VN MVP 2010
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4327
  • Respect: +256
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Reaction Shifting to maintain equilibrium
« Reply #11 on: June 20, 2010, 05:03:54 pm »
0
Yes, its the way that its written, i.e. reactants products.

An exothermic reaction releases energy in the form of heat (usually), and so an increase in temperature (according to Le Chatelier's Principle) will cause there to be a net backwards reaction (which would require energy, and so is endothermic) to oppose the effect of the increase in temp.


I believe for an equilibrium reaction when one side of the equilibrium system is favoured, we use a two single headed arrows with a larger arm - indicating the side that is favoured.

------->
<---



That's really just for explanatory purposes. Normally they just stick with the same double arrow, and whichever side is favoured will be indicated in the equilibrium constant (K) which typically always accompanies any equilibrium reaction.
MBBS (hons) - Monash University

YR11 '07: Biology 49
YR12 '08: Chemistry 47; Spesh 41; Methods 49; Business Management 50; English 43

ENTER: 99.70


naved_s9994

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1412
  • Respect: +15
Re: Reaction Shifting to maintain equilibrium
« Reply #12 on: June 20, 2010, 07:40:40 pm »
0
Yes, its the way that its written, i.e. reactants products.

An exothermic reaction releases energy in the form of heat (usually), and so an increase in temperature (according to Le Chatelier's Principle) will cause there to be a net backwards reaction (which would require energy, and so is endothermic) to oppose the effect of the increase in temp.


I believe for an equilibrium reaction when one side of the equilibrium system is favoured, we use a two single headed arrows with a larger arm - indicating the side that is favoured.

------->
<---



That's really just for explanatory purposes. Normally they just stick with the same double arrow, and whichever side is favoured will be indicated in the equilibrium constant (K) which typically always accompanies any equilibrium reaction.

Okay, thanks for that information :)
'Keep you friends close, but keep your enemies closer'

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: Reaction Shifting to maintain equilibrium
« Reply #13 on: June 20, 2010, 07:47:51 pm »
0
Hmm doesn't really make sense how you can alter the yield without altering the rate of a forward/backward reaction. Like if everything proceeds normally, it would have the same yield?

m@tty

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4324
  • Respect: +33
  • School: Heatherton Christian College
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Reaction Shifting to maintain equilibrium
« Reply #14 on: June 20, 2010, 08:16:26 pm »
0
Yield is concerned with the end result of the reaction at equilibrium, while rate is the about the speed at which equilibrium is arrived at. For an altered yield the rates at which the individual forward- and back-reactions proceed are altered, but this does not mean that the overall rate must also change.

And I don't really understand your question. What do you mean by "normally"? And "the same" as compared to what?
2009/2010: Mathematical Methods(non-CAS) ; Business Management | English ; Literature - Physics ; Chemistry - Specialist Mathematics ; MUEP Maths

96.85

2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering and Bachelor of Science, Monash University

2015-____: To infinity and beyond.