Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 22, 2025, 07:03:45 pm

Author Topic: Integration Cases  (Read 3280 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: Integration Cases
« Reply #30 on: July 14, 2010, 09:18:07 pm »
0
Why is it that not but

tcg93

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
  • Respect: +2
Re: Integration Cases
« Reply #31 on: July 14, 2010, 09:19:43 pm »
0
Why is it that not but

The mod makes them the same thing - try subbing any value of x in - you will get the same result. 2x - 5 just looks nicer.
Methods | Specialist | Chemistry | English | UMEP Maths | Cisco | IT Applications

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: Integration Cases
« Reply #32 on: July 15, 2010, 10:17:48 pm »
0
thanks

why is it that ?

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Integration Cases
« Reply #33 on: July 15, 2010, 10:18:38 pm »
0
thanks

why is it that ?
differentiate the RHS and you will see why :D
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: Integration Cases
« Reply #34 on: July 15, 2010, 10:35:20 pm »
0
Yea but why doesn't that formula apply? (ax+b)^-1

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Integration Cases
« Reply #35 on: July 15, 2010, 10:36:35 pm »
0
i dono that formula, i just do it manually.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Integration Cases
« Reply #36 on: July 15, 2010, 11:00:31 pm »
0
thanks

why is it that ?

Ok this is really.basic. but take out 1/2 then you have 1/x -> .5ln|x|
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

tcg93

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
  • Respect: +2
Re: Integration Cases
« Reply #37 on: July 16, 2010, 12:56:34 pm »
0
Yea but why doesn't that formula apply? (ax+b)^-1

yeah don't use the formula because you may "forget" it in the exam, just manipulate the integral moving coefficients outside the integral so you get a function's derivative on top of the function
Methods | Specialist | Chemistry | English | UMEP Maths | Cisco | IT Applications

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Integration Cases
« Reply #38 on: July 16, 2010, 02:19:25 pm »
0
Yea but why doesn't that formula apply? (ax+b)^-1

it doesn't apply because , a trivial case where the power rule fails.
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time