Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 20, 2025, 08:14:32 am

Author Topic: Accounting Question Thread  (Read 50436 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

eeps

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2532
  • Respect: +343
Re: EPL.11.4ever.'s Question Thread
« Reply #150 on: September 15, 2010, 04:25:49 pm »
0
Question:

I don't get Q. 1.1.2 of the Insight 2008 Unit 4 Exam.

One of the transactions which must be recorded, is where the business purchases 10 Jackets for $100, thus $10 each. My question is in the 'Balance'... which was originally (2*60=120) and (10*70=700). In the solutions they've added $10 (from the Jackets) to the $70, making it 10*80=800. I don't really get why they've done that... I've attached a image of the transaction and the suggested solution (stock card) to make it easier. The question is in relation to Inv. 255.

Cheers.

lqzeng

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • Respect: 0
Re: EPL.11.4ever.'s Question Thread
« Reply #151 on: September 15, 2010, 04:39:55 pm »
0
Question:

I don't get Q. 1.1.2 of the Insight 2008 Unit 4 Exam....

Hey,
If I'm not mistaken, the $10 for 10 units of $70 stock is for the FREIGHT of each item of stock (it can be logically applied as it is $100 for freight of 10 units) and is therefore added onto each unit of stock as a product cost.

eeps

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2532
  • Respect: +343
Re: EPL.11.4ever.'s Question Thread
« Reply #152 on: September 15, 2010, 04:42:02 pm »
0
LOL. oh yeah... what a stupid error! :P I fail.

Now it makes more sense...

Thanks! :)

eeps

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2532
  • Respect: +343
Re: EPL.11.4ever.'s Question Thread
« Reply #153 on: September 18, 2010, 04:20:31 pm »
0
Question:

Apart from physical safeguards, suggest one action the owner could take to reduce stock loss expense. (1 mark)

Cheers.

z1m2v3

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 14
  • Respect: +1
Re: EPL.11.4ever.'s Question Thread
« Reply #154 on: September 18, 2010, 05:31:26 pm »
0
by decreasing stock holdings, you are reducing the likelihood of stock loss due to damage, theft etc.

eeps

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2532
  • Respect: +343
Re: EPL.11.4ever.'s Question Thread
« Reply #155 on: September 18, 2010, 07:12:00 pm »
0
by decreasing stock holdings, you are reducing the likelihood of stock loss due to damage, theft etc.

Thanks!

eeps

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2532
  • Respect: +343
Re: EPL.11.4ever.'s Question Thread
« Reply #156 on: September 20, 2010, 09:01:19 am »
0
Question:

Does anyone have any other negative consequences to having a too fast DTO (Debtors Turnover), besides that the fact that the business may giving out too much discount to debtors (thus, receiving less cash)? I'm trying to find the negative and positive consequences of having a too fast DTO, STO etc.

Thanks.

EDIT:
I got it.
« Last Edit: September 20, 2010, 09:29:40 am by EPL.11.4ever. »

eeps

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2532
  • Respect: +343
Re: EPL.11.4ever.'s Question Thread
« Reply #157 on: September 20, 2010, 09:34:21 am »
0
Another Question:

This was on the 2007 VCAA exam...

"State two possible reasons, apart from budget error, why actual cost of sales could be less than budgeted despite sales exceeding budget expectations." (2 marks)

My first reason was that the business found a cheaper supplier of stock, thus reducing COS. I can't really think of another one... :\ Does anyone have any other reason(s)?

Cheers.

darcy42

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 196
  • Respect: +1
Re: EPL.11.4ever.'s Question Thread
« Reply #158 on: September 20, 2010, 09:47:09 am »
0
You could kinda work that one answer into two, like:
-Business changed suppliers in order to get a cheaper price for stock
-Supplier lowered their prices

or you could go the other way and say that the business might have increased its selling prices. So like, actual amount of sales might have been less than budgeted, so cost of sales is less than budgeted, however sales revenue is higher than expected due to the increase in selling prices.

sorry for crappy explanation haha

2010: ATAR: 99.55
2011: Arts/Law@Monash

_avO

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1915
  • Respect: +15
Re: EPL.11.4ever.'s Question Thread
« Reply #159 on: September 20, 2010, 09:48:33 am »
0
increase markup on sales price

buying in bulk thus cheaper cost

using product costing as opposed to period costing
2011-2014: Bachelor of Commerce/Economics @ Monash Clayton

eeps

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2532
  • Respect: +343
Re: EPL.11.4ever.'s Question Thread
« Reply #160 on: September 20, 2010, 09:50:45 am »
0
You could kinda work that one answer into two, like:
-Business changed suppliers in order to get a cheaper price for stock
-Supplier lowered their prices

or you could go the other way and say that the business might have increased its selling prices. So like, actual amount of sales might have been less than budgeted, so cost of sales is less than budgeted, however sales revenue is higher than expected due to the increase in selling prices.

sorry for crappy explanation haha

increase markup on sales price

buying in bulk thus cheaper cost

using product costing as opposed to period costing

Thanks! very solid responses. LOL when someone else says it... it sounds so obvious. :P

eeps

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2532
  • Respect: +343
Re: EPL.11.4ever.'s Question Thread
« Reply #161 on: September 20, 2010, 04:55:08 pm »
0
I'm not attempting any TSSM paper... it's horrible. Their solutions are wrong and they miss questions in the answer booklet. :l and yet they're called "The Specialised School For Mathematics." - the irony.

They confuse me into thinking one way... which I then find out is wrong... I suggest no one do any TSSM papers in general as a heads up. LOL this just could be me... but that's the feeling I get doing their papers.

eeps

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2532
  • Respect: +343
Re: EPL.11.4ever.'s Question Thread
« Reply #162 on: September 23, 2010, 12:55:10 am »
0
This is probably more of a left-field question... is there a positive consequence of having a slow DTO - Debtors Turnover?

Thanks.
« Last Edit: September 23, 2010, 02:02:47 am by EPL.11.4ever. »

_avO

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1915
  • Respect: +15
Re: EPL.11.4ever.'s Question Thread
« Reply #163 on: September 23, 2010, 01:05:53 am »
0
No. Just no. :P

Nah idk actually this is a tough one
2011-2014: Bachelor of Commerce/Economics @ Monash Clayton

eeps

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2532
  • Respect: +343
Re: EPL.11.4ever.'s Question Thread
« Reply #164 on: September 23, 2010, 01:59:03 am »
0
No. Just no. :P

Nah idk actually this is a tough one

haha? LOL. :P THANKS for that comment...