Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 03, 2025, 06:16:36 am

Author Topic: Complex Analysis  (Read 5778 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: Complex Analysis
« Reply #15 on: August 01, 2010, 03:20:17 pm »
0
Ooohhhh, I see now, thanks =D

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: Complex Analysis
« Reply #16 on: August 22, 2010, 12:21:19 pm »
0
Suppose you need to integrate a real function such as so you introduce a complex function which has poles at the blue crosses in the picture (and some others in the lower half plane that aren't important). Aren't both of the possible contours just as valid as each other? The only difference is that one of them encloses 4 poles while the other only encloses 2, but once you shrink the small semi-cirlces to zero radius they should have zero contribution anyway..
« Last Edit: August 22, 2010, 03:06:14 pm by /0 »

humph

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +16
Re: Complex Analysis
« Reply #17 on: August 23, 2010, 11:04:49 am »
0
Of course. But in either case the little semicircles may have a non-neglible contribution even as you shrink them smaller and smaller.
VCE 2006
PhB (Hons) (Sc), ANU, 2007-2010
MPhil, ANU, 2011-2012
PhD, Princeton, 2012-2017
Research Associate, University College London, 2017-2020
Assistant Professor, University of Virginia, 2020-

Feel free to ask me about (advanced) mathematics.

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: Complex Analysis
« Reply #18 on: August 25, 2010, 04:06:11 am »
0
Ah thanks humph, I skimmed over that lemma before

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: Complex Analysis
« Reply #19 on: August 27, 2010, 03:20:18 pm »
0
Bit of a dumb question here,

If , then why doesn't have a branch cut on the negative real axis (assuming the principal logarithm)?

humph

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +16
Re: Complex Analysis
« Reply #20 on: August 27, 2010, 04:11:19 pm »
0
The branch cut from the negative logarithm is because when you approach it from one side you get a different limit than from the other side. But note that , so it doesn't make any difference when you take an integer power.
VCE 2006
PhB (Hons) (Sc), ANU, 2007-2010
MPhil, ANU, 2011-2012
PhD, Princeton, 2012-2017
Research Associate, University College London, 2017-2020
Assistant Professor, University of Virginia, 2020-

Feel free to ask me about (advanced) mathematics.

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: Complex Analysis
« Reply #21 on: August 27, 2010, 05:33:47 pm »
0
o right, thanks

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: Complex Analysis
« Reply #22 on: August 29, 2010, 12:20:50 am »
0
Just a few last minute questions xD

1. If you have a function like .


Is it ok if for and you choose different intervals of existence for and ?
i.e. can you rotate each of the branch cuts however you like?

And would this mean you have to deal with each logarithm as a separate entity? (i.e. anymore?)





2. Also, for , we take . The solutions take the left contour, but I'm wonder, why couldn't we just take the right contour and just ignore the pole at ?

Thanks
« Last Edit: August 29, 2010, 12:26:28 am by /0 »

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: Complex Analysis
« Reply #23 on: November 17, 2010, 08:45:17 pm »
0
From the PDEs exam:

"

a) Obtain the general solution of the first order PDE:
 


b) If we prescribe on the upper portion of the hyperbola , , show that no solution exists unless is of a special form. Find this form and show that in such a case there are infinitely many solutions.
"


I tried solving this the way it's done in the lecture notes but it didn't work =/



,    ,   

I can't solve any of these straight away so the usual method is already looking shaky

But I notice that,



And,

, which means ,

Hence, , but is a function of so .

Still, this isn't the solution... and I couldn't do the next part of the question

How can you solve it?
« Last Edit: November 17, 2010, 08:48:45 pm by /0 »

humph

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +16
Re: Complex Analysis
« Reply #24 on: November 17, 2010, 09:32:36 pm »
0
Hah, this was one of my assignment questions a couple of years ago. I'll just post it up in full.


Let us parametrise the characteristic curve in the plane of this partial differential equation by , and let . As the chain rule implies that

it follows that we can write

Writing , we see that the latter two ordinary differential equations are equivalent to the vector-valued ordinary differential equation

The matrix above has eigenvalues with corresponding eigenvectors , and so the solution to this ordinary differential equation is given by

where . Thus we have that and . Substituting these values into the earlier expression for , we have that

which, by multiplying through by the integrating factor , can be rearranged to read

and so we can integrate to find that

or equivalently, by substituting back in , , and then multiplying through by ,

where depends on the chosen characteristic curve. These characteristic curves are the solutions to

which, by separating variables, we can solve to find that

where . Thus we have that for any arbitrary function , and so


With this solution of the partial differential equation, we therefore have that on the upper portion of the hyperbola , ,

Thus if is not of the form for some , then we cannot have that on the upper portion of the hyperbola , . If, on the other hand, is of this form, then there are infinitely many solutions of the partial differential equation satisfying this prescribed condition, as there are infinitely many functions satisfying ; for example, we could have for any .
VCE 2006
PhB (Hons) (Sc), ANU, 2007-2010
MPhil, ANU, 2011-2012
PhD, Princeton, 2012-2017
Research Associate, University College London, 2017-2020
Assistant Professor, University of Virginia, 2020-

Feel free to ask me about (advanced) mathematics.

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: Complex Analysis
« Reply #25 on: November 17, 2010, 11:31:04 pm »
0
lol wow that's pretty full-on. I don't know why it didn't occur to me to use the theory of DE systems from 2405... i mean, that stuff's made for these PDEs. But even if it did the double exponentials would probably have put me off.
But yeah that definitely makes sense, thanks a bunch humph :)
« Last Edit: November 17, 2010, 11:33:32 pm by /0 »