What lectures is everyone going to?

[vexx]

VATE - English Language

That iiiiit.

was/is it good?

haven't been yetttttt, but will be quite good i can imagine.

[crayolé]

Yepp, only VATE - English for me too ;]

[Bohr]

All lectures are a waste of time and monay, who else agrees with me?

[98.40_for_sure]

All lectures are a waste of time and monay, who else agrees with me?

With the exception of one, DERRICK HA

[iffets12345]

Um, I have his spesh book from last year, i couldn't find anything on variable force. does anyone know where it is.

[slothpomba]

I just realised its going to be an epic bitch to get to VU footscray... Stupid public transport... 2 hours (and i live on the west side too) and i gotta go monash after that for access chem

[m@tty]

Um, I have his spesh book from last year, i couldn't find anything on variable force. does anyone know where it is.

There is an entire section on variable acceleration in this year's book. pg.73.

[sillysmile]

I'm going to the VATE literature seminar... should be great.

[chrisjb]

anyone find themselves at melbourne uni today for Engaged seminars? Legal Studies and I think Psychology was on. Legal was OK, but I could've probably given a more detailed lecture than the guy did... and it just draggeeeedddd ooonnnnnnnnn... 6 and a half hours is too long to be kept in a confined space.

[matt123]

im not going to any i dont think
i went to engage biology .. it was biggest waste of 7 hours of my life.
i would have learned more if i stood outside and watched my lemon tree grow.

i really wanna go to chem/english . but i feel like its just gonna be a waste of time
i went to chem mid year tsfx and it was also a waste of time and $100 lol

so idk man
wat u guys think?

also .. all the lectures are like ... now
do you know of any lectures closer to the exam?

[sillysmile]

yeah I agree, engage psych was pretty bad too.

[matt123]

yeah I agree, engage psych was pretty bad too.

yeah i heard

but hey
i honestly give the bio engage one
1/10 if that.

they went over less than half the course
in shit detail
and crap lecturer

[slothpomba]

Yeah, i reckon the longer lectures especially from companies that aren't VATE/TSFX (tsfx is terrible on its on but they do a good longer lecture) are pretty terrible.

Go for the shorter ones i reckom, you go to lectures for a summary not getting the whole text book read to you again...

The guy for access chem sounds pretty good though, assessor since 1986

[matt123]

Yeah, i reckon the longer lectures especially from companies that aren't VATE/TSFX (tsfx is terrible on its on but they do a good longer lecture) are pretty terrible.

Go for the shorter ones i reckom, you go to lectures for a summary not getting the whole text book read to you again...

The guy for access chem sounds pretty good though, assessor since 1986

acess chem is like . this week isnt it?
a bit too late to get tickets.

[Slumdawg]

Yeah, i reckon the longer lectures especially from companies that aren't VATE/TSFX (tsfx is terrible on its on but they do a good longer lecture) are pretty terrible.

Go for the shorter ones i reckom, you go to lectures for a summary not getting the whole text book read to you again...

The guy for access chem sounds pretty good though, assessor since 1986

hmm that sounds like chris dwyer? I saw him at the pathways education chem lecture. He was pretty good, he basically just went through questions. Although he didn't manage his time well, so he had to skip the last quarter of the lecture basically. Having said that, it'd still be worth it to go.

acess chem is like . this week isnt it?
a bit too late to get tickets.

Pathways lecture is on the 10th of October so there is still heaps of time to apply. And it would basically be the same lecture.. Their psych one is really really awesome though.