Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 20, 2025, 06:39:43 pm

Author Topic: Context response critique  (Read 2163 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

JVG

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • Respect: +1
Context response critique
« on: September 26, 2010, 09:08:39 pm »
0
Hi guys, could you please take a look at this and grade it in exam terms (out of 10). Cheers.


‘Wearing a mask can sometimes protect a fragile sense of self’
Many of us would posit that our communities are accepting places in which individuals are always able to access the social and emotional resources needed to prosper through occasional ‘winters of mischance’. Yet such an assertion requires a deeper and more probing reflection as we can often be blinded by our own easy attachment to socially dominant groups. There undoubtedly exists in our communities concrete definitions of what is, and what isn’t, normal or ideal. To deviate from the binary perceptions of our own social ‘role’ is to risk ostracism and exclusion from those around we. Thus, to be human can mean be a performer, that is, to make the choice to wear a mask that conceals our innate sense of difference so that we feel included, or alternatively, to reveal our true persona despite the pain that it might entail.

As an individual living in a modern society, there are certain expectations about how we function and integrate with the people and institutions that are within. Social constructs that dictate our role in society can accommodate and affirm our own individual sense of identity if they are representative of who we are. A life in which there is no need to conceal our innermost thoughts and feelings so that we can conform should not be taken for granted, as not being ‘in the negative’ means that we will never have to choose between being rejected and isolated, or alternatively, being untrue to who we really are. For a young male who finds that he cannot abide by the strict conceptualisations of masculinity and sexuality in his community, the decision must be made to either accept and embrace their own innate identity, or to mask it for the sake of acceptance.

The choice to either play a role that is not authentic to oneself, or instead, to break free from rigid social directives is incredibly difficult. As a homosexual, coming to grips with the knowledge that we will never share in certain experiences glorified by the community around we can be filled with shock, disbelief, injustice, guilt, apathy and aggression. Same-sex relationship are not recognised as legitimate relationships by numerous social institutions such as hospitals, churches and the government. When the immediate-delivery-Disney-fold-up-and-fairy tale potential that we first imagined and hoped for instead becomes an indifferent world of ‘don’t ask don’t tell’, what else can we feel but isolated and alone?

It is often easier to deny our own differences rather than risk marginalisation and rejection by many of the people around we. The deep intolerance of homosexuality that still exists in today’s society carries over to workplaces and sporting clubs. Whilst such organisations may pay lip service to notions of diversity and acceptance, achievement in the corporate world and on the sporting field is often out of reach for those who diverge from accepted norms. Success in these environments depends not only on skill and determination, but on close interaction with the people around we. Those who are ostracised and denied access to appropriate networks and mentors cannot undergo the professional advancement needed to reach to the pinnacle of their careers. For some individuals, there is little choice but to repress their innate instincts and create an imitation of themselves that is tolerated by the groups around them. However, by submitting to such social demands there is often a heavy price to pay.  By forcing troubling questions about identity and sexuality to the back of our head, and trying to live an ‘ideal’, yet inauthentic, life, we risk hurting ourselves and others. By lying to those around us, or even entering into a relationship just to maintain an aura of normality, we only chance spreading the hurt that we sought to avoid. Although it may seem that we must disguise the parts of ourselves that others will not accept, in order to protect others and remain true to ourselves, we must consider being open about who we are.

Yet, in choosing not obscure what makes us different many difficulties arise. At risk is our involvement in all that we have ever known, our relationships with peers and family members,  as well as our engagement with a society that repudiates who we are. The crucial need for belonging is compromised, as one who chooses to diverge from the mainstream is destined to be outcast. Furthermore, in identifying oneself as a member of a minority group, the same type of pressure to conform is applied, albeit in a much smaller microcosm. If the young gay male openly announces his sexuality to others, more, if not different, societal expectations are placed upon how he should act. Will he adopt the ironic and camp modes of communication or embrace  the performance customs and superficial mores that have been typified by the gay subculture? Being involved in any group involves some sacrifice as we have to mould who we to fit in and enjoy the resulting sense of belonging. However, so that we can express an authentic image of ourselves, we must strive to surround ourselves with people who best affirm our own sense of who we are and provide us with the insight that allows us to remain positive, despite what others may say.

The need to belong and identify with other humans is innate and an extremely important factor of living a happy and fulfilled life. To simply comply with the binding restrictions and demands of social groups is not nearly enough, because in the end, we must be able to express who we are. Although it may be likely that we may be hurt, or even disadvantaged, the cost of not being true to oneself can be much greater. We need other people around us who will support and accept who we are. The difficult task lies in striking a balance between our need to belong, and our need to live our lives in a genuine manner.

2009: Media (50), Legal Studies (44)
2010: English (47), Maths Methods (31), French (40), International Studies (50) and COM1010 MUEP (5.5- Highest Achiever)
ATAR: 99.90
Australian Student Prize 2010
Melbourne National Scholarship
Melbourne Copland Scholarship
Kwong Lee Dow Scholar

Slumdawg

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1531
  • Respect: +65
Re: Context response critique
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2010, 09:35:29 pm »
0
Hi guys, could you please take a look at this and grade it in exam terms (out of 10). Cheers.


‘Wearing a mask can sometimes protect a fragile sense of self’
Many of us would posit that our communities are accepting places in which individuals are always able to access the social and emotional resources needed to prosper through occasional ‘winters of mischance’. Yet such an assertion requires a deeper and more probing reflection as we can often be blinded by our own easy attachment to socially dominant groups. There undoubtedly exists in our communities concrete definitions of what is, and what isn’t, normal or ideal. To deviate from the binary perceptions of our own social ‘role’ is to risk ostracism and exclusion from those around we. Thus, to be human can mean be a performer, that is, to make the choice to wear a mask that conceals our innate sense of difference so that we feel included, or alternatively, to reveal our true persona despite the pain that it might entail.

As an individual living in a modern society, there are certain expectations about how we function and integrate with the people and institutions that are within. Social constructs that dictate our role in society can accommodate and affirm our own individual sense of identity if they are representative of who we are. A life in which there is no need to conceal our innermost thoughts and feelings so that we can conform should not be taken for granted, as not being ‘in the negative’ means that we will never have to choose between being rejected and isolated, or alternatively, being untrue to who we really are. For a young male who finds that he cannot abide by the strict conceptualisations of masculinity and sexuality in his community, the decision must be made to either accept and embrace their own innate identity, or to mask it for the sake of acceptance.

The choice to either play a role that is not authentic to oneself, or instead, to break free from rigid social directives is incredibly difficult. As a homosexual, coming to grips with the knowledge that we will never share in certain experiences glorified by the community around we can be filled with shock, disbelief, injustice, guilt, apathy and aggression. Same-sex relationship are not recognised as legitimate relationships by numerous social institutions such as hospitals, churches and the government. When the immediate-delivery-Disney-fold-up-and-fairy tale potential that we first imagined and hoped for instead becomes an indifferent world of ‘don’t ask don’t tell’, what else can we feel but isolated and alone?

It is often easier to deny our own differences rather than risk marginalisation and rejection by many of the people around we. The deep intolerance of homosexuality that still exists in today’s society carries over to workplaces and sporting clubs. Whilst such organisations may pay lip service to notions of diversity and acceptance, achievement in the corporate world and on the sporting field is often out of reach for those who diverge from accepted norms. Success in these environments depends not only on skill and determination, but on close interaction with the people around we. Those who are ostracised and denied access to appropriate networks and mentors cannot undergo the professional advancement needed to reach to the pinnacle of their careers. For some individuals, there is little choice but to repress their innate instincts and create an imitation of themselves that is tolerated by the groups around them. However, by submitting to such social demands there is often a heavy price to pay.  By forcing troubling questions about identity and sexuality to the back of our head, and trying to live an ‘ideal’, yet inauthentic, life, we risk hurting ourselves and others. By lying to those around us, or even entering into a relationship just to maintain an aura of normality, we only chance spreading the hurt that we sought to avoid. Although it may seem that we must disguise the parts of ourselves that others will not accept, in order to protect others and remain true to ourselves, we must consider being open about who we are.

Yet, in choosing not obscure what makes us different many difficulties arise. At risk is our involvement in all that we have ever known, our relationships with peers and family members,  as well as our engagement with a society that repudiates who we are. The crucial need for belonging is compromised, as one who chooses to diverge from the mainstream is destined to be outcast. Furthermore, in identifying oneself as a member of a minority group, the same type of pressure to conform is applied, albeit in a much smaller microcosm. If the young gay male openly announces his sexuality to others, more, if not different, societal expectations are placed upon how he should act. Will he adopt the ironic and camp modes of communication or embrace  the performance customs and superficial mores that have been typified by the gay subculture? Being involved in any group involves some sacrifice as we have to mould who we to fit in and enjoy the resulting sense of belonging. However, so that we can express an authentic image of ourselves, we must strive to surround ourselves with people who best affirm our own sense of who we are and provide us with the insight that allows us to remain positive, despite what others may say.

The need to belong and identify with other humans is innate and an extremely important factor of living a happy and fulfilled life. To simply comply with the binding restrictions and demands of social groups is not nearly enough, because in the end, we must be able to express who we are. Although it may be likely that we may be hurt, or even disadvantaged, the cost of not being true to oneself can be much greater. We need other people around us who will support and accept who we are. The difficult task lies in striking a balance between our need to belong, and our need to live our lives in a genuine manner.



Well, I'd firstly recommend including a specific reference to your text/s. This piece seems like a 7/10 to me, maybe even a 6.5/10 if I was being very harsh. I think you could focus more on the notion of wearing a mask, or bearing a facade. Currently that idea isn't jumping out, when it really should. Nonetheless, I think it's good how you don't seem to overdo your vocab and the simple structure both works for and against the piece. However, without specific references or examples you can't get better marks. Hope that helps, keep writing essays and you'll be writing 10/10 pieces in no time!
2010 ATAR: 98.35 - Psychology [50] Media Studies [47
2011-'13: Bachelor of Biomedicine [Neuroscience Major] at Melbourne Uni 
2014-'17: Doctor of Medicine (MD) at Melbourne Uni 


JVG

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • Respect: +1
Re: Context response critique
« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2010, 09:43:09 pm »
0
Thanks for looking at it. It's much appreciated.
I don't think that actual concrete and explicit examples of the text are required, rather the ideas inherent in the text (for me that was Bruce Dawe's 'Sometimes Gladness') must be evoked.

thanks again- and good luck with your vce too
2009: Media (50), Legal Studies (44)
2010: English (47), Maths Methods (31), French (40), International Studies (50) and COM1010 MUEP (5.5- Highest Achiever)
ATAR: 99.90
Australian Student Prize 2010
Melbourne National Scholarship
Melbourne Copland Scholarship
Kwong Lee Dow Scholar

Slumdawg

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1531
  • Respect: +65
Re: Context response critique
« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2010, 09:50:20 pm »
0
Thanks for looking at it. It's much appreciated.
I don't think that actual concrete and explicit examples of the text are required, rather the ideas inherent in the text (for me that was Bruce Dawe's 'Sometimes Gladness') must be evoked.

thanks again- and good luck with your vce too

Oh, are you in year 11 then? (if not don't bother reading on cos I'm now assuming you are) That makes a bit of a difference haha. Well I remember in year 11 our teachers didn't hammer into us that we needed to give explicit examples. But when it's expository or persuasive, in year 12, they really really force us to provide clear examples from at least one of our texts. Even just some real examples from the world would be good. Just to back up your ideas, otherwise the essay can appear a bit vague. Other than that, good job :)

Didn't even realise Sometimes Gladness was a year 12 text! haha. awkward...

« Last Edit: September 26, 2010, 10:20:56 pm by shilayli06 »
2010 ATAR: 98.35 - Psychology [50] Media Studies [47
2011-'13: Bachelor of Biomedicine [Neuroscience Major] at Melbourne Uni 
2014-'17: Doctor of Medicine (MD) at Melbourne Uni 


brightsky

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3136
  • Respect: +200
Re: Context response critique
« Reply #4 on: September 26, 2010, 10:10:53 pm »
0
‘Wearing a mask can sometimes protect a fragile sense of self’

Many of us would posit that our communities are accepting places in which individuals are always able to access the social and emotional resources needed to prosper through occasional ‘winters of mischance’. Though not a rule of thumb, it's suggested that you establish your contention right from the onset of your introduction. Also be sure to include some of the key terms in the prompt/topic to ascertain a sense of relevance right from the start and show the marker that you are not merely regurgitating a prepared intro as one may misconstrue this to be.Yet such an assertion requires a deeper and more probing reflection as we can often be blinded by our own easy attachment to socially dominant groups. There undoubtedly exists in our communities concrete definitions of what is, and what isn’t, This seems a bit vague.normal or ideal. To deviate from the binary perceptions of our own social ‘role’ is to risk ostracism and exclusion from those around we. Maybe relate this back to the terms 'fragile sense of self'. What effects does ostracism have on this "sense of self"? Thus, to be human can mean being a performer Nice metaphor., that is, to make the choice to wear a mask that conceals our innate sense of difference so that we feel included, or alternatively, to reveal our true persona despite the pain that it might entail.

As an individual living in a modern society, there are certain expectations about how we function and integrate with the people and institutions that are within. Social constructs that dictate our role in society can accommodate and affirm our own individual sense of identity if they are representative of who we are. A life in which there is no need to conceal our innermost thoughts and feelings so that we can conform should not be taken for granted, as not being ‘in the negative’ means that we will never have to choose between being rejected and isolated, or alternatively, being untrue to who we really are. For a young male who finds that he cannot abide by the strict conceptualisations of masculinity and sexuality in his community, the decision must be made to either accept and embrace their own innate identity, or to mask it for the sake of acceptance. You've highlighted the essential idea in your last sentence but I don't think you've explored it adequately enough.

The choice to either play a role that is not authentic to oneself, or instead, to break free from rigid social directives is incredibly difficult. As a homosexual, coming to grips with the knowledge that we will never share in certain experiences glorified by the community around we can be filled with shock, disbelief, injustice, guilt, apathy and aggression. Both conceptually and syntactically, this sentence sounds a bit dodgy. It seems that you are asserting that all humans are homosexual. Same-sex relationships are not recognised as legitimate relationships by numerous social institutions such as hospitals, churches and the government. When the immediate-delivery-Disney-fold-up-and-fairy tale potential that we first imagined and hoped for instead becomes an indifferent world of ‘don’t ask don’t tell’, what else can we feel but isolated and alone?

It is often easier to deny our own differences rather than risk marginalisation and rejection by many of the people around we us. The deep intolerance of homosexuality Try not to reuse the same examples.that still exists in today’s society carries over to workplaces and sporting clubs. Whilst such organisations may pay lip service to notions of diversity and acceptance, achievement in the corporate world and on the sporting field is often out of reach for those who diverge from accepted norms. Success in these environments depends not only on skill and determination, but on close interaction with the people around weus. Those who are ostracised and denied access to appropriate networks and mentors cannot undergo the professional advancement needed to reach to the pinnacle of their careers. For some individuals, there is little choice but to repress their innate instincts and create an imitation of themselves that is tolerated by the groups around them. However, by submitting to such social demands there is often a heavy price to pay.  By forcing troubling questions about identity and sexuality to the back of our head, and trying to live an ‘ideal’, yet inauthentic, life, we risk hurting ourselves and others. By lying to those around us, or even entering into a relationship just to maintain an aura of normality, we only chance spreading the hurt that we sought to avoid. Although it may seem that we must disguise the parts of ourselves that others will not accept, in order to protect others and remain true to ourselves, we must consider being open about who we are.
You've incorporated a lot of big ideas in this paragraphs. Maybe split them into separate paragraphs and explore them separately?

Yet, in choosing not obscure what makes us different many difficulties arise.Dodgy sentence. At risk is our involvement in all that we have ever known, our relationships with peers and family members,  as well as our engagement with a society that repudiates who we are. The crucial need for belonging is compromised, as one who chooses to diverge from the mainstream is destined to be outcast. Furthermore, in identifying oneself as a member of a minority group, the same type of pressure to conform is applied, albeit in a much smaller microcosm. If the young gay male openly announces his sexuality to othersAgain, try not to reuse the same examples., more, if not different, societal expectations are placed upon how he should act. Will he adopt the ironic and camp modes of communication or embrace  the performance customs and superficial mores that have been typified by the gay subculture? Being involved in any group involves some sacrifice as we have to mould who we areto fit in and enjoy the resulting sense of belonging. However, so that we can express an authentic image of ourselves, we must strive to surround ourselves with people who best affirm our own sense of who we are and provide us with the insight that allows us to remain positive, despite what others may say.

The need to belong and identify with other humans is innate and an extremely important factor of living a happy and fulfilled life. To simply comply with the binding restrictions and demands of social groups is not nearly enough, because in the end, we must be able to express who we are. Although it may be likely that we may be hurt, or even disadvantaged, the cost of not being true to oneself can be much greater. We need other people around us who will support and accept who we are. The difficult task lies in striking a balance between our need to belong, and our need to live our lives in a genuine manner. I don't think the conclusion has enough relevance to the actual topic.

Overall, your expression and vocabulary is to a very high standard. However, structurely, I think you need to organise your ideas a bit more and frame your topic sentences/linking sentences a bit better. You should also include (at least once) in your essay the key words of the topic such as "mask", "protect" and "fragile sense of self". Also, as previously mention, make reference to the texts you've studied to give more specific backup/examples of what you are trying to say, instead of reusing the same homosexuality example. I think you're at around 6-7/10.

Hope this helps!
2020 - 2021: Master of Public Health, The University of Sydney
2017 - 2020: Doctor of Medicine, The University of Melbourne
2014 - 2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine, The University of Melbourne
2013 ATAR: 99.95

Currently selling copies of the VCE Chinese Exam Revision Book and UMEP Maths Exam Revision Book, and accepting students for Maths Methods and Specialist Maths Tutoring in 2020!

Slumdawg

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1531
  • Respect: +65
Re: Context response critique
« Reply #5 on: September 26, 2010, 10:23:48 pm »
0
Btw I'd kill for a 50 in media haha. Awesome job! That would have been really really hard to get.

Any tips? How many practice exams did you do?, btw, what examples did you use for media influence in the exam cos the assessor's reports always talk about how outdated war of the worlds and bandura examples are..

The tables have turned. You need to help me now haha.
2010 ATAR: 98.35 - Psychology [50] Media Studies [47
2011-'13: Bachelor of Biomedicine [Neuroscience Major] at Melbourne Uni 
2014-'17: Doctor of Medicine (MD) at Melbourne Uni 


happyhappyland

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 802
  • Respect: +22
Re: Context response critique
« Reply #6 on: September 26, 2010, 10:50:04 pm »
0
Ill give it a 6 out of 10, because I wrote an essay on this which got 9/10 I used quite a different approach dealing with more evidence from the assigned txts (predominantly catcher in the rye) but Im not sure if you did catcher. Youre expression is quite good but I would include what evidence or what ideas you have drawn from in your introduction. I also dont like short paragraphs, this may be a personal thing, but your third paragraph was a bit short. Generally stick to three ideas and write three main paragraphs on these with a strong topic sentence that governs those ideas.
2011: Bachelor of Science (Melbourne)