Login

Search the forums now!

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 04:41:40 am
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down

Author Topic: SAC Rankings  (Read 9366 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

AppleThief

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 648
  • Respect: +6
Re: SAC Rankings
« Reply #30 on: October 01, 2008, 08:23:16 pm »
0
Quote from: RD on October 01, 2008, 08:19:43 pm
lol, there were people who went to MHS on BoS who were getting B+'s in their BM SACs and ended up with 50.
SACs are probably hard there, though, due to them only accepting academically-able students
Logged

costargh

  • Guest
Re: SAC Rankings
« Reply #31 on: October 01, 2008, 08:28:00 pm »
0
I don't see how you could made BM hard... I reckon they would be titeass markers... like taking off marks for not giving a really good definition or being slightly vague... or the questions are major ambiguous and that leads to worse marks.
Logged

vce01

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1013
  • Respect: +2
Re: SAC Rankings
« Reply #32 on: October 01, 2008, 08:39:15 pm »
0
nah my teacher gives me marks if what i write is close enough in meaning to what he wants lol.

the other guy though, well lets just say on one sac our class avg was 20/20, the other class' was around 12
Logged
ENTER - 96.00

2009: Commerce/Law @ ANU.

Noblesse

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1263
  • Respect: +10
Re: SAC Rankings
« Reply #33 on: October 01, 2008, 08:44:13 pm »
0
Maybe they have really, really long SACs so no gets them finished.
Logged

costargh

  • Guest
Re: SAC Rankings
« Reply #34 on: October 01, 2008, 08:51:15 pm »
0
Lol thats so fucked. thats just stupid marking and it stuffs up rankings.

Yeh maybe long sacs, didnt consider that lol
Logged

vce01

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1013
  • Respect: +2
Re: SAC Rankings
« Reply #35 on: October 01, 2008, 09:03:42 pm »
0
yeah they are a bit long actually, altho the good kids are able to get the 95%+ marks. but they're like, the creme de la creme rofl. i hope i used that right
Logged
ENTER - 96.00

2009: Commerce/Law @ ANU.

costargh

  • Guest
Re: SAC Rankings
« Reply #36 on: October 01, 2008, 09:06:14 pm »
0
I have 7 days to study for Business. If I don't get a good mark (relative to my own standards, not MHS's lol), then I'll be sad lol.
Oh and I found something funny

Quote from: elaine on November 13, 2007, 02:39:44 pm
What's the difference between employee relations and industrial relations?
I'm freaking out about friday lol

Yeh she did so horribly ;)
Logged

Noblesse

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1263
  • Respect: +10
Re: SAC Rankings
« Reply #37 on: October 01, 2008, 09:12:09 pm »
0
Lousy ITA on the Tuesday -_-

Oh well, it is a better gap that I will get for English+Further Maths+Accounting (what a tiring couple of days that will be)
Logged

vce01

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1013
  • Respect: +2
Re: SAC Rankings
« Reply #38 on: October 01, 2008, 09:13:47 pm »
0
3 days for me.

chem on thursday but i couldnt care less about that haa. hmm im not planning on leaving it for those 3 days tho.
Logged
ENTER - 96.00

2009: Commerce/Law @ ANU.

RD

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1135
  • Respect: +2
Re: SAC Rankings
« Reply #39 on: October 02, 2008, 07:02:40 am »
0
Quote from: Jamison on October 01, 2008, 09:12:09 pm
Lousy ITA on the Tuesday -_-

Oh well, it is a better gap that I will get for English+Further Maths+Accounting (what a tiring couple of days that will be)
same thing for me, Eng, Further, Further, Acc, ITA, BM. we nearly do the same subjects :)
Logged

kelep

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Respect: +1
Re: SAC Rankings
« Reply #40 on: October 03, 2008, 04:57:08 pm »
0
finished 2nd out of around 40 students.
ended up with total sac marks of 184 out of 200 for the year
Logged

RD

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1135
  • Respect: +2
Re: SAC Rankings
« Reply #41 on: October 03, 2008, 06:31:15 pm »
0
Quote from: kelep on October 03, 2008, 04:57:08 pm
finished 2nd out of around 40 students.
ended up with total sac marks of 184 out of 200 for the year
Nice Nice, I only got like 154/200, Mainly cause I didn't care until half-way through unit 4.
Logged

costargh

  • Guest
Re: SAC Rankings
« Reply #42 on: October 03, 2008, 06:40:53 pm »
0
Hey I want to know my number out of 100! She's never told anyone. She only tells ranks.

*snoops off to do investigating*
Logged

RD

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1135
  • Respect: +2
Re: SAC Rankings
« Reply #43 on: October 12, 2008, 03:41:19 pm »
0
Quote from: costargh on October 03, 2008, 06:40:53 pm
Hey I want to know my number out of 100! She's never told anyone. She only tells ranks.

*snoops off to do investigating*
opposite for me, we get marks, not ranks =/

so my rank is only an assumption
Logged

Noblesse

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1263
  • Respect: +10
Re: SAC Rankings
« Reply #44 on: October 12, 2008, 03:51:03 pm »
0
Our teacher gives us ranks and marks. We went over our SACs throughout the year so people got a chance to find out what they need to brush up on.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up