Woo, glad it works properly.
I'll update the data with the latest scaling report soon.
Ok I put mine in, and it said -
aggregate:201.2
enter:less than 30
but the aggregate was fairly accurate, my real aggregate was 201.9
Gah, that's a bug I think:P
Basically, I grabbed all the values on the aggregate to ENTER chart, put them into a database table, and then look up the aggregate in it. There seems to be some values missing, and I guess that's one of them (only some values are missing, so an aggregate of 201.8 or 202.0 would have given the correct results
). I need to look for what's missing and insert them into the database
Hopefully, this year's aggregate to ENTER table is more complete :knuppel2:
Otherwise, I should probably have a better fix, detect any missing values or something.
actually even an extra point .05 instead of my stupid .95 ending enter gaaaar
Mine was probably the worst possible - The clearly-in ENTER for Computer Science at Melbourne Uni is 85, and they don't let anyone do the course if they got an ENTER lower than that. I got
84.95.
That's not
so bad; I hear the course at Swinburne is better (and their English score requirement is 20, as opposed to 25 at Melbourne Uni). But I swear, Melbourne Uni want to tease me. To get to Swinburne from here, I need to catch a tram to Flinders Street Station and then a train to wherever Swinburne is. The tram
goes past Melbourne Uni along the way, so I'll be seeing it every time I go to Uni.