Login

Search the forums now!

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

January 10, 2026, 09:02:45 pm
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Q4. Flying Fox - Geometry.  (Read 8024 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

10weid

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 313
  • Respect: +1
Re: Q4. Flying Fox - Geometry.
« Reply #15 on: November 03, 2010, 04:48:34 pm »
0
i did spesh, and methods, and further

and i am 150% sure its 7.75...
hell yeees
Logged
2009: Mathematical Methods CAS 49 | Biology 49
2010: Chemistry 47 | Further Mathematics 48 | English 42 | Specialist Mathematics 43
2010 VCE ATAR 99.65
UMAT: 98th %ile
2012: MBBS I - Monash

*Anyone requiring VCE aid, or HELP GETTING INTO MEDICINE, please don't hesitate to PM me :)*

superstar1

  • Guest
Re: Q4. Flying Fox - Geometry.
« Reply #16 on: November 03, 2010, 04:51:23 pm »
0
yeh sorry. thats wat io meant 8, because 12.5 -4.5 gave u 8. sorry thats wat i did. i cudn't remember the question.
Logged

pirocan1

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 182
  • Respect: +1
Re: Q4. Flying Fox - Geometry.
« Reply #17 on: November 03, 2010, 04:57:32 pm »
0
so would i get a consequential mark for using ratios? :)
Logged

ynnaej19

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Respect: 0
Re: Q4. Flying Fox - Geometry.
« Reply #18 on: November 03, 2010, 05:18:33 pm »
0
7.75! :)
Logged

xoxogossipgirl

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 222
  • Respect: +1
Re: Q4. Flying Fox - Geometry.
« Reply #19 on: November 03, 2010, 05:24:36 pm »
0
I don't at all remember what I wrote but I'm sure it was wrong. If I could see the paper I might remember what I wrote =/
Logged

nonstop9328

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 60
  • Respect: 0
Re: Q4. Flying Fox - Geometry.
« Reply #20 on: November 03, 2010, 05:42:13 pm »
0
5.08
Logged

sam.utute

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1412
  • Connecturer.
  • Respect: +46
Re: Q4. Flying Fox - Geometry.
« Reply #21 on: November 03, 2010, 05:46:30 pm »
0
I think I was the only person who calculated the area and found it. Weird. Seemed logical to me lol :P
Logged

breeno

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Respect: 0
Re: Q4. Flying Fox - Geometry.
« Reply #22 on: November 03, 2010, 05:56:46 pm »
0
Logged

nonstop9328

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 60
  • Respect: 0
Re: Q4. Flying Fox - Geometry.
« Reply #23 on: November 03, 2010, 05:59:27 pm »
0
isn't that the answer?
Logged

captain_kirk

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 84
  • Respect: +6
Re: Q4. Flying Fox - Geometry.
« Reply #24 on: November 03, 2010, 06:04:09 pm »
0
nah its definately 7.75m
Logged

Predator

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 354
  • Respect: +4
Re: Q4. Flying Fox - Geometry.
« Reply #25 on: November 03, 2010, 08:13:19 pm »
0
Would you get one mark for forgetting to add the 4? Stupid mistake I know :(
Logged
ATAR 2010: 84.70

Physical Education: 40
Further Maths: 38
Economics: 36
Design & Technology: 35
English: 34
Visual Communication and Design: 34

Rationalize

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Respect: 0
Re: Q4. Flying Fox - Geometry.
« Reply #26 on: November 03, 2010, 08:19:00 pm »
0
also, the question asked you to find the value without specifying how many digits to round it off to, indicating that the answer you'd get would be exact, true?
Logged

msf101

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • Respect: 0
Re: Q4. Flying Fox - Geometry.
« Reply #27 on: November 03, 2010, 08:23:07 pm »
0
For the flying fox Question.

I did 12.5/95 = PH/65 ---> to work out PH, and got 8.55m.

What did I do wrong here??
Logged

nickk

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 14
  • Respect: 0
Re: Q4. Flying Fox - Geometry.
« Reply #28 on: November 03, 2010, 09:44:49 pm »
0
only the triangle on top is similar you cannot use the whole shape
The CORRECT answer is 7.75M
Logged

cjudd3votes

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 24
  • Respect: 0
Re: Q4. Flying Fox - Geometry.
« Reply #29 on: November 03, 2010, 09:49:02 pm »
0
I used the gradient method to get 7.75 and checked with the ratio thingo.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up