Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

February 15, 2026, 12:41:11 am

Author Topic: Englang Exam Discussion!  (Read 30445 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

nbalakers24

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 672
  • Respect: +2
Re: Englang Exam Discussion!
« Reply #75 on: November 03, 2010, 08:29:32 pm »
0
What did you guys write for features to show that Part 2 was formal? I think I wrote use of jargon and passive voice but dunno the last one

jargon, declarative to inform terms and conditions and capitalised pronouns.

wanted to mention passive but couldn't discuss it. LOL

do you mean capitalised proper nouns?

yes but ah f%$k i wrote pro nouns in the exam  :'( :'( :'(

_avO

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1915
  • Respect: +15
Re: Englang Exam Discussion!
« Reply #76 on: November 03, 2010, 08:30:44 pm »
0
this is english language, pro is short for proper :)
2011-2014: Bachelor of Commerce/Economics @ Monash Clayton

Visionz

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1185
  • Respect: +1
Re: Englang Exam Discussion!
« Reply #77 on: November 03, 2010, 08:40:54 pm »
0
I said there was 2 functions. One to inform of the product and another to entertain with the nonstandard language and discourse particles.


Im fucking pleased. I thought it was easy and you guy who studied must have thought it was piss. I struggled with the wording on the short answers, found myself repeating a few things but I think I did enough. For the essay I did q13 and wrote all about PC and attitudes, taxed all that shit from the thread we made last night. Haha. and 5 pages in 55 minutes with all 5 bodies, not all complete though. =\ still chuffed that its over and chuffed that it turned out not too hard.

BTW when I saw the essay topics I thought they were pretty kind. I had trouble picking which one, I could have written equally as much on all 3 even though im not that great.

bec036

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • Respect: 0
Re: Englang Exam Discussion!
« Reply #78 on: November 03, 2010, 08:46:18 pm »
0
this is english language, pro is short for proper :)
really!? thats cool as. guess you have nothing to worry about then balakers :)
2009: Biology [36]

2010: Chemistry, Revolutions, English Language, Methods, Physical Education.

ENTER aim: 95+
___________________________________________
Wed: English Language @ 3:00
Fri: Methods @ 9:00
Monday: Methods @ 11:45
                 P.E. @ 3:00

Thursday: Chemistry @ 9:00
               History @ 3:00

simonhu81292

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 553
  • Respect: +8
Re: Englang Exam Discussion!
« Reply #79 on: November 03, 2010, 09:05:32 pm »
0
haha ..you guys were pro...
i was like thinking for most of the time ....
i guess knowing too much can be disastrous ...
i only had 35 mins to write my essay ..
so ended up...screwing it with intro+2 body paragraphs+ordinary conclusion
BAD...  :(
2009: -.- bio 3/4
2010: -.- Physics . Spesh . Methods CAS . Chinese SL Advanced . Chemistry . English Language
_____________________________________________________

2011-B.Com@UoM
2014 - Hons in Finance@UoM
2015 - Working in Funds Management (Equities)

_avO

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1915
  • Respect: +15
Re: Englang Exam Discussion!
« Reply #80 on: November 03, 2010, 09:37:13 pm »
0
I was so happy that the first topic came up, it's the only essay I practiced on xD
2011-2014: Bachelor of Commerce/Economics @ Monash Clayton

gamblor0

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 71
  • Respect: +1
Re: Englang Exam Discussion!
« Reply #81 on: November 03, 2010, 10:30:15 pm »
0
okay 3 questions!!
firstly was q 1 to inform the reader of the shit thats going on and to instruct the reader to buy tickets as well as where to?
question 3 was it a pun?
and i think it was question 4 the one that asked for the 3 features that show the fomality.. would i get full marks for saying 1) there was no contractions as in they said "are not" not "aren't" 2) capitilising important things like "Guest Contact Centre" and 3) they used lots of specific dates like "1st Dec, 2009" to add formalitiy??

thankyou!! :D
I AM THE GAMBLOR.
NEVER QUESTION THAT.

naved_s9994

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1412
  • Respect: +15
Re: Englang Exam Discussion!
« Reply #82 on: November 03, 2010, 10:31:41 pm »
0
okay 3 questions!!
firstly was q 1 to inform the reader of the shit thats going on and to instruct the reader to buy tickets as well as where to?
question 3 was it a pun?
and i think it was question 4 the one that asked for the 3 features that show the fomality.. would i get full marks for saying 1) there was no contractions as in they said "are not" not "aren't" 2) capitilising important things like "Guest Contact Centre" and 3) they used lots of specific dates like "1st Dec, 2009" to add formalitiy??

thankyou!! :D


If the dates were to add to the formality then it would have been writen December, not Dec.
'Keep you friends close, but keep your enemies closer'

nbalakers24

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 672
  • Respect: +2
Re: Englang Exam Discussion!
« Reply #83 on: November 03, 2010, 10:41:32 pm »
0
this is english language, pro is short for proper :)
really!? thats cool as. guess you have nothing to worry about then balakers :)

LOl hes just joking , its clearly wrong, pro nouns = he she etc

LFTM

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1072
  • Respect: +1
Re: Englang Exam Discussion!
« Reply #84 on: November 04, 2010, 12:07:16 am »
0
okay 3 questions!!
firstly was q 1 to inform the reader of the shit thats going on and to instruct the reader to buy tickets as well as where to?
question 3 was it a pun?
and i think it was question 4 the one that asked for the 3 features that show the fomality.. would i get full marks for saying 1) there was no contractions as in they said "are not" not "aren't" 2) capitilising important things like "Guest Contact Centre" and 3) they used lots of specific dates like "1st Dec, 2009" to add formalitiy??

thankyou!! :D

I mentioned contractions too and used that exact same example. Are we right? pls say yes

vexx

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3965
  • Respect: +66
Re: Englang Exam Discussion!
« Reply #85 on: November 04, 2010, 12:16:16 am »
0
okay 3 questions!!
firstly was q 1 to inform the reader of the shit thats going on and to instruct the reader to buy tickets as well as where to?
question 3 was it a pun?
and i think it was question 4 the one that asked for the 3 features that show the fomality.. would i get full marks for saying 1) there was no contractions as in they said "are not" not "aren't" 2) capitilising important things like "Guest Contact Centre" and 3) they used lots of specific dates like "1st Dec, 2009" to add formalitiy??

thankyou!! :D

I mentioned contractions too and used that exact same example. Are we right? pls say yes

yeah contractions are informal so thats fine.
i'm not so sure about the specific dates, but you could back it up with metalanguage and it would be fine, so something about it being declarative sentence to state facts to increase formality, etc.
2010 VCE: psychology | english language | methods cas | further | chemistry | physical ed | uni chemistry || ATAR: 97.40 ||

2011: BSc @ UoM

Y1: biology of cells&organisms | music psychology | biological psychology | secret life of language | creative writing
    || genetics&the evolution of life | biochemistry&molecular biology | techniques of molecular science -.- | mind,brain&behaviour 2

20XX: MEDICINE

bec036

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • Respect: 0
Re: Englang Exam Discussion!
« Reply #86 on: November 04, 2010, 08:36:42 am »
0
this is english language, pro is short for proper :)
really!? thats cool as. guess you have nothing to worry about then balakers :)

LOl hes just joking , its clearly wrong, pro nouns = he she etc

haha wow i'm gullable! well i guess it will only lose you 1 mark at least so dont stress. 
2009: Biology [36]

2010: Chemistry, Revolutions, English Language, Methods, Physical Education.

ENTER aim: 95+
___________________________________________
Wed: English Language @ 3:00
Fri: Methods @ 9:00
Monday: Methods @ 11:45
                 P.E. @ 3:00

Thursday: Chemistry @ 9:00
               History @ 3:00

cambiej

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 56
  • VCE is the devil.
  • Respect: +1
Re: Englang Exam Discussion!
« Reply #87 on: November 04, 2010, 10:35:29 am »
0
Gunna try and get my hands on a paper and upload for us, kids :)
2009: Psychology; International Studies
2010: English; English Language; Theatre Studies; UMEP Linguistics
ATAR: 99.95

Tutoring English (50), International Studies (50) and Psychology (50) in 2011. PM me :)

gamblor0

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 71
  • Respect: +1
Re: Englang Exam Discussion!
« Reply #88 on: November 04, 2010, 12:13:12 pm »
0
Gunna try and get my hands on a paper and upload for us, kids :)

wow 2 50's last yr? shit
I AM THE GAMBLOR.
NEVER QUESTION THAT.

Billy123

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Respect: 0
Re: Englang Exam Discussion!
« Reply #89 on: November 04, 2010, 05:55:25 pm »
0
what happens if u accidentally wrote the language analysis in the section B part and vice versa?