Exam!

[Vadnal]

How did you guys go  

[Souljette_93]

Yeah, i wonder how my sis went..

[goldsgym]

Wasn't too hard.
Nothing on the Heart Foundation, HDI, WHO, NRV or the NHPA programs, which was frustrating because I thought they would definitely be on there.

The VicHealth question very straight forward though.

I think I got around a low A+.

[omer691]

for the vic health questions did u talk about their values or the elements of a sustainable program

[Vadnal]

I agree goldsgym, easy exam they could've made it way harder, no values or priorities of vic health, all the who / un core functions ect..
A good question would be 2 core functions of the who and how they promote sustainable human development.

[omer691]

what do u reckon the A+ cut off mark is last year it was 72 percent???

[Vadnal]

Probably about 70% I'd say.

[omer691]

what was the answer to the characteristics that the WHO have on developing and developed countries

[Vadnal]

Acess to health care
Food insecurity

With an explanation that access to health care is lower for developed countries when compared to developed countries.
Food insecurity is greater in developing countries compared to developed countries.

[omer691]

how did u go on the sample exam Vandal
do u have any idea for the grades req for 45+

[omer691]

i comletly forgot that and wrote life exp and standard of living

[Vadnal]

I think I got 90%-95% can't remember.
For 45+ it would be A+ A+ A+ no doubt, mid A+ for sure so maybe 85% on the exam?

[omer691]

SAC u3 81
Sac u4 89
Exam 85-90+
hopefully 45+
because i got a really harsh making teacher but im ranked first in cohort
sample exam 92

[Vadnal]

Nice work dude, do you know what your rank is? The rank is more important in the sacs than the actual %.

[omer691]

yea ranked first but u noe whats funny i raped health but methods raped me the fucking whole last two pages blank so im relying on a very ss for health to compensate for methods