Nonono, I'm not assuming that [H+] equals [CH3COOH].
You have the ionization reaction which is..
CH3COOH = H+ + CH3COO-
What we're saying is that the amount of H+ and CH3COO- is the same. We want to find out what [H+] is so we say that the concentration of H+ is equal to x. Since there is as much CH3COO- as H+, the concentration of CH3COO- equals x too. The assumption that the [CH3COOH] doesn't change comes in here. Since the value of x is so small we can say that [CH3COOH-x] = [CH3COOH].
Then the pH is equal to -log(x).
Hope that helps..
How can you assume that c(H+)=c(CH3COO-)
because in the first neutralisation reaction there was 0.005 mol CH3COO-...Then there was 0.005 mol CH3COOH left over. Since ethanoic acid is a weak acid, it won't produce 0.005 mol H+, therefore, c(H+)=/=c(CH3COO-) even though there is a one to one ratio??........
I meant....How can you assume that c(H+)=c(CH3COO-)....typo...
I totally agree with you if it were just a buffer solution
But...The first reaction...
NaOH + CH3COOH > CH3COONa + H20
will produce 0.005 mol of CH3COO-...as it fully reacts...0.005 mol NaOH with 0.005 mol CH3COOH
Then the second reaction...
CH3COOH + H20 > CH3COO- +H3O+
we have 0.005 mol of CH3COOH left over from the first reaction. Since it will not fully ionise...It cannot produce 0.005 mol of H+ ions.
So the number of ethanoate ions we have = 0.005 (from first reaction) + any produced in ionisation
let x be the n(CH3COO-) produced in the ionisation of ethanoic acid.
Therefore n(CH3COO-)overall=x+0.005
n(H+)from ionisation=n(CH3COO-)from ionisation=x
Therefore n(H+)=x
n(CH3COO-)overall=x+0.005
n(H+)overall=x
so n(CH3COO-)>n(H+) not equal to?
Sorry again, i just don't get how they can be equal....
It just seems that any H+ produced will have a CH3COO- with it...But from the first reaction, we have 0.005 mol of CH3COO- still hanging around......
I really appreciate this.