Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 04, 2025, 08:35:25 am

Author Topic: LEGAL STUDIES EXAM THOUGHTS/DISCUSSION  (Read 25797 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

chrisjb

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1047
  • ROAR
  • Respect: +64
Re: LEGAL STUDIES EXAM THOUGHTS/DISCUSSION
« Reply #75 on: November 10, 2010, 11:15:57 pm »
0
Last question on 2006 paper:

a. ‘Parliament is a very effective law-maker. There are no significant weaknesses in the way parliament
carries out this role.’
Discuss this statement and indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with it.
Justify your conclusions.

Remind you of anything?
2011: 96.35
2012: http://www.thegapyear2012.com/
2013: Arts (Global) Monash
2016: Juris Doctor (somewhere)

andy456

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 951
  • Respect: +12
Re: LEGAL STUDIES EXAM THOUGHTS/DISCUSSION
« Reply #76 on: November 10, 2010, 11:19:01 pm »
0
I thought I had read the question before.......
just couldnt place it
VCE 2010: Eng 42 | Legal 49 | Chem 37 | MM 34 | Indo SL 33 |
ATAR: 97.45
 
2011: Bachelor of Arts Monash University
2012: Bachelor of Commerce?? Please!!

KateS

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Respect: 0
Re: LEGAL STUDIES EXAM THOUGHTS/DISCUSSION
« Reply #77 on: November 11, 2010, 08:00:04 am »
0
Good. So long as other people put County too. :P

I absolutely loved the extended response on the adversary system. I didn't think they would put it on there though, so that was a nice surprise.

Strangely, it was the 1 and 2 mark questions that got me. Like the rights of the police and the individual. My teacher spent no time on these and basically told us to go memorise three of each. Which was fine except the ones I had learnt were all from before an arrest and the question asked for after. So I made an educated guess. I hope they're right. 
CRAP.... So fingerprinting is wrong???
what are police powers after an arrest

I said that a police power is to detain the suspect for what is considered to be a 'reasonable' time, and that a right of the individual is to request a phone call to a friend or relative in that time. But I'm not entirely sure if that's right, and I've already thrown all my notes out so I can't double check haha
First preference - Bachelor of Environments at Melb Uni 2011
Required ATAR: 85

KateS

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Respect: 0
Re: LEGAL STUDIES EXAM THOUGHTS/DISCUSSION
« Reply #78 on: November 11, 2010, 08:03:50 am »
0
Just found them on the computer:


Arrest - your rights

Police must tell you why you are being arrested
Must ‘caution’ you before questioning you formally
Can only hold you in custody for a ‘reasonable time’ without charging you
In most cases, you have the right to phone a friend or relative, and to phone a lawyer in private.
First preference - Bachelor of Environments at Melb Uni 2011
Required ATAR: 85

wonkachic

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 13
  • Respect: 0
Re: LEGAL STUDIES EXAM THOUGHTS/DISCUSSION
« Reply #79 on: November 11, 2010, 08:56:26 am »
0
What swayed me towards Magistrates' court was the fact that he was sentanced to 1500 hours of community service. Surely culpable driving causing death would not get a community based sentance?
agree ^^!
and also the fact that Q2 stated. who would give the sanction in this case? and i thought this was a trick of the vcaa to try to get students to write straight away a Judge... but in the magistrates court it is a Magistrate.
fingers crossed!!

cleo_xo

  • Guest
Re: LEGAL STUDIES EXAM THOUGHTS/DISCUSSION
« Reply #80 on: November 11, 2010, 10:08:28 am »
0
Good. So long as other people put County too. :P

I absolutely loved the extended response on the adversary system. I didn't think they would put it on there though, so that was a nice surprise.

Strangely, it was the 1 and 2 mark questions that got me. Like the rights of the police and the individual. My teacher spent no time on these and basically told us to go memorise three of each. Which was fine except the ones I had learnt were all from before an arrest and the question asked for after. So I made an educated guess. I hope they're right. 
CRAP.... So fingerprinting is wrong???
what are police powers after an arrest

I said that a police power is to detain the suspect for what is considered to be a 'reasonable' time, and that a right of the individual is to request a phone call to a friend or relative in that time. But I'm not entirely sure if that's right, and I've already thrown all my notes out so I can't double check haha

that's exactly what i said :)

aposta28

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 157
  • Respect: +1
Re: LEGAL STUDIES EXAM THOUGHTS/DISCUSSION
« Reply #81 on: November 11, 2010, 12:30:34 pm »
0
I did the 2 very simple ones:

Right to remain silent (accused)


Demand for name and address of person charged   (police)

lara2707

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 135
  • Respect: +6
Re: LEGAL STUDIES EXAM THOUGHTS/DISCUSSION
« Reply #82 on: November 11, 2010, 01:09:12 pm »
0
I said right to remain silent, and power to take body samples if consent is given or a court order is obtained :)
2009 - Psychology (44)
2010 - English (45), German (42), Revolutions (37), Geography (42), Legal Studies (38)
ATAR - 98.55
2011 - (Probably) Arts at Melbourne Uni

darcy42

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 196
  • Respect: +1
Re: LEGAL STUDIES EXAM THOUGHTS/DISCUSSION
« Reply #83 on: November 11, 2010, 01:27:29 pm »
0
I said right to have an interpreter present during questioning if English is deficient,
and power to question arrested person for a reasonable period of time.
2010: ATAR: 99.55
2011: Arts/Law@Monash

flash36

  • Guest
Re: LEGAL STUDIES EXAM THOUGHTS/DISCUSSION
« Reply #84 on: November 11, 2010, 02:36:53 pm »
0
^ That's what I used.

ezst

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 64
  • Respect: +6
Re: LEGAL STUDIES EXAM THOUGHTS/DISCUSSION
« Reply #85 on: November 11, 2010, 05:08:36 pm »
0
I said right to remain silent, and power to take body samples if consent is given or a court order is obtained :)
Exactly what i did. "The right to take DNA samples from an individual over the age of 18, when a court warrant is obtained"
2009: VET Automotive 3+4

2010: English, Further, Psych, Health + Legal

2011: Criminal Justice and Admin (RMIT)

dilan_892

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 5
  • Respect: 0
Re: LEGAL STUDIES EXAM THOUGHTS/DISCUSSION
« Reply #86 on: November 11, 2010, 10:03:13 pm »
0
no it isnt
I did magistrates as well :( 2 marks gone :(:(

dude our teacher who is an examiner said it was magistrates wth :S

culpable driving isn't that serious of an offence! -.-'
Culpable driving is reckless driving causin harm... i think...

 but Does culpable driving mean someone died??

Hellhole

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 140
  • Respect: +1
Re: LEGAL STUDIES EXAM THOUGHTS/DISCUSSION
« Reply #87 on: November 12, 2010, 12:14:28 am »
0
Just quickly, back to the 10-marker. How many pages did roughly everyone write? I wrote 2.5 or there abouts, hopefully covered enough. Probably just worried for no reason, but meh. Should be studying for business! FML.

andy456

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 951
  • Respect: +12
Re: LEGAL STUDIES EXAM THOUGHTS/DISCUSSION
« Reply #88 on: November 12, 2010, 09:40:58 am »
0
Just quickly, back to the 10-marker. How many pages did roughly everyone write? I wrote 2.5 or there abouts, hopefully covered enough. Probably just worried for no reason, but meh. Should be studying for business! FML.
just over 3.... i did the first one
VCE 2010: Eng 42 | Legal 49 | Chem 37 | MM 34 | Indo SL 33 |
ATAR: 97.45
 
2011: Bachelor of Arts Monash University
2012: Bachelor of Commerce?? Please!!

babygurl

  • Guest
Re: LEGAL STUDIES EXAM THOUGHTS/DISCUSSION
« Reply #89 on: November 12, 2010, 11:54:30 am »
0
Sorry, so why is fingerprinting wrong?