Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 03, 2026, 12:38:25 pm

Author Topic: 2010 EXAM THOUGHTS  (Read 79846 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

_avO

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1915
  • Respect: +15
Re: WHAT. A. SHIT. EXAM
« Reply #195 on: November 13, 2010, 03:26:50 pm »
0
Maybe it should have been 'Analyse how driving forces can cause change, and how restraining forces can be overcome '
2011-2014: Bachelor of Commerce/Economics @ Monash Clayton

davo__66

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • Respect: 0
Re: WHAT. A. SHIT. EXAM
« Reply #196 on: November 13, 2010, 03:34:19 pm »
0
What did you guys wrie for mangment functions and startegies for the airline case study?

gs

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 119
  • Respect: +5
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: WHAT. A. SHIT. EXAM
« Reply #197 on: November 13, 2010, 03:37:55 pm »
0
What did you write? The correct answers were HR Management, research & development, marketing, finance, etc. Had to pick two and elaborate.

For the record, I stupidly did not answer it correctly.
Bachelor of Laws / Bachelor of Business
'VU Achievement Scholarship' recipient

jsher098

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 142
  • Respect: +1
Re: WHAT. A. SHIT. EXAM
« Reply #198 on: November 13, 2010, 03:44:44 pm »
0
you can't possibly argue that restraining forces cause change as the definition is 'aim to prevent change from occuring' so it would sound ridiculous

100% correct.
I'm glad one person agrees with me... I think I am going mad... people are trying to argue that first of all you can explain kotter's 8 step theory for a question not related to kotters and secondly... argue that restraining forces cause change... what has the world come to

waldo777

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 66
  • Respect: +9
  • School: Koonung Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: WHAT. A. SHIT. EXAM
« Reply #199 on: November 13, 2010, 03:50:09 pm »
0
you can't possibly argue that restraining forces cause change as the definition is 'aim to prevent change from occuring' so it would sound ridiculous

100% correct.

I am not saying that restraining forces can cause change, JUST STATING THAT THAT'S WHAT I BELIEVE THE QUESTION SAID!!

Can anyone remember the exact wording?
I'm glad one person agrees with me... I think I am going mad... people are trying to argue that first of all you can explain kotter's 8 step theory for a question not related to kotters and secondly... argue that restraining forces cause change... what has the world come to
2010: Business Management [46]
2011: English [40] | Accounting [47] | Legal Studies [46]  |  Methods [31] |  UMEP Accounting [5.5]
ATAR [98.40]
2012: Commerce at UoM (Economics and Accounting)

waldo777

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 66
  • Respect: +9
  • School: Koonung Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: WHAT. A. SHIT. EXAM
« Reply #200 on: November 13, 2010, 03:50:54 pm »
0
*I am not saying that restraining forces can cause change, JUST STATING THAT THAT'S WHAT I BELIEVE THE QUESTION SAID!!

Can anyone remember the exact wording?
2010: Business Management [46]
2011: English [40] | Accounting [47] | Legal Studies [46]  |  Methods [31] |  UMEP Accounting [5.5]
ATAR [98.40]
2012: Commerce at UoM (Economics and Accounting)

burbs

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1800
  • Fuck da police - Aristotle
  • Respect: +227
Re: WHAT. A. SHIT. EXAM
« Reply #201 on: November 13, 2010, 03:52:55 pm »
0
Something like.

Effectively managing change is important for organisations. Discuss possible restraining and driving forces for change. Refer to either one change issue or one organisation you have studied this year.

You should have merged issue+organisation.

jsher098

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 142
  • Respect: +1
Re: WHAT. A. SHIT. EXAM
« Reply #202 on: November 13, 2010, 03:53:23 pm »
0
vcaa should be sued for the amount of distress they cause to vce students...
make us study for the whole course and ask us questions on 10% of it HAHAHHAHHA

jsher098

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 142
  • Respect: +1
Re: WHAT. A. SHIT. EXAM
« Reply #203 on: November 13, 2010, 03:54:43 pm »
0
Something like.

Effectively managing change is important for organisations. Discuss possible restraining and driving forces for change. Refer to either one change issue or one organisation you have studied this year.

You should have merged issue+organisation.

Clearly the question required a general introduction than to particularly discuss a case study...
The question did not ask to explain how restraining forces cause change... vcaa are pretty dumb but not that bad

davo__66

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • Respect: 0
Re: WHAT. A. SHIT. EXAM
« Reply #204 on: November 13, 2010, 03:57:48 pm »
0
What did you write? The correct answers were HR Management, research & development, marketing, finance, etc. Had to pick two and elaborate.

For the record, I stupidly did not answer it correctly.

I wrote the marketing department, and the startegie was to make advertising campaigns through tv and radio to promote the airline more and get in more recongised in the public to attarct more customers. Also a new logo, to revamp the image of the airline.

The 2nd mangment was finance. And that was reducing the price of the tickets to appeal to customers as it saves them money and such. Offocurse i went in more detail in the answer. DO you think these startegies and functions are correct?

burbs

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1800
  • Fuck da police - Aristotle
  • Respect: +227
Re: WHAT. A. SHIT. EXAM
« Reply #205 on: November 13, 2010, 03:58:54 pm »
0
Well, the way I approached it was this:

1) Defined change
2) Defined globalisation
3) Talked about how globalisation caused a need for change at Ford
4) Talked about the specific driving and restraining forces (3 each i think) in detail.
 that took up the whole space. I then had 20 minutes so as a safe measure, I put down a condensed version of:

5) How Kotter's theory can be used to reduce resistance through empowerment and communication.
6) A summary.

davo__66

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • Respect: 0
Re: WHAT. A. SHIT. EXAM
« Reply #206 on: November 13, 2010, 03:58:58 pm »
0
What did you write? The correct answers were HR Management, research & development, marketing, finance, etc. Had to pick two and elaborate.

For the record, I stupidly did not answer it correctly.

what did you write?

davo__66

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • Respect: 0
Re: WHAT. A. SHIT. EXAM
« Reply #207 on: November 13, 2010, 04:03:34 pm »
0
also what are some startegies to act more ethical and social reponsible?

is not using child labour and ensuring product realiblitty correct?

burbs

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1800
  • Fuck da police - Aristotle
  • Respect: +227
Re: WHAT. A. SHIT. EXAM
« Reply #208 on: November 13, 2010, 04:06:29 pm »
0
Product reliability, if you said through a specific quality strategy, then yes.

Child labour seems more HRM to me.

Albeno69

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 746
  • Respect: +2
Re: WHAT. A. SHIT. EXAM
« Reply #209 on: November 13, 2010, 04:08:14 pm »
0
Product reliability, if you said through a specific quality strategy, then yes.

Child labour seems more HRM to me.
are high risk practices are a form of not obliging to social responsibility?