Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 13, 2025, 08:02:40 pm

Author Topic: Biomedicine too risky ?  (Read 18498 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mandy

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 844
  • Respect: +28
Biomedicine too risky ?
« on: December 06, 2010, 03:48:06 pm »
0
Hey guys,

So the ATAR is coming out soon and I'm worried because I don't know what I should do next year. What I do know is I want to study in the field of medical science and finish in a medical/health related career.
Right now, I'm currently stuck between Bachelor of Biomedicine or Bachelor of Science at UniMelb and Bachelor of Pharmacy at Monash or something similar. I fall under the SEAs scheme, so I'm hoping that'll be enough to get me into one of my preferred courses.

I did horribly on the UMAT this year, so is it too risky to do Biomed/Science and then do the GAMSAT (hoping to progress onto Doctor of Medicine)? Should I take the risk to study Biomed/Science or just go with a safer option and do Pharmacy?

Help please, thank you :)
2009:
Biology [34]   Vietnamese [36]
2010:
English [48]   Chemistry [37]   Further [38]   Methods [39]   Specialist [29]
2010 ATAR: 97.20
2011: Bachelor of Biomedicine @ UniMelb

_henwee

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 281
  • Respect: +1
Re: Biomedicine too risky ?
« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2010, 03:53:46 pm »
0
Yeah - I would do pharmacy, if I got in.
Then if you decide to do the other - you can just fill in the prerequisites through single-subject studies.
I think Pharmacy satisfies two of the prerequisites - physio and biochem. You can do the anatomy subject at unimelb.

But you know - if you don't like pharmacy - then don't do it.
I hear their job is very boring and all.

Russ

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8442
  • Respect: +661
Re: Biomedicine too risky ?
« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2010, 03:54:14 pm »
0
You can do graduate medicine regardless of whether you studied biomedicine or pharmacy. I'm not sure how you see pharmacy as a safer option, they're two different career pathways. If you have an interest in pharmacy but you're not sure whether you would also like to study medicine at some point in the future, then studying pharmacy and deciding after the end of first year (a transfer) or at the end of your degree (applying for P/G medicine) sounds like the best option here. Bear in mind, you don't need to do prereq subjects if you accept an offer to Monash or Deakin, which are the other two Victorian PG med courses.

The UMAT has no bearing on how "risky" it will be for you to apply for postgraduate medicine
« Last Edit: December 06, 2010, 03:56:09 pm by Russ »

_henwee

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 281
  • Respect: +1
Re: Biomedicine too risky ?
« Reply #3 on: December 06, 2010, 03:55:36 pm »
0
Pharmacy is a safer option because at the end of the degree you can actually get a job, unlike the biomed/science.

Russ

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8442
  • Respect: +661
Re: Biomedicine too risky ?
« Reply #4 on: December 06, 2010, 03:57:08 pm »
0
Point taken (you can get a job though, hmph)
« Last Edit: December 06, 2010, 04:05:19 pm by Russ »

mandy

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 844
  • Respect: +28
Re: Biomedicine too risky ?
« Reply #5 on: December 06, 2010, 04:03:37 pm »
0
But you know - if you don't like pharmacy - then don't do it.
I hear their job is very boring and all.

I do think Pharmacy is a little boring.. But I was considering it as a career because it's also related to health and it seems easier to find a job at the end of the degree.

You can do graduate medicine regardless of whether you studied biomedicine or pharmacy. I'm not sure how you see pharmacy as a safer option, they're two different career pathways. If you have an interest in pharmacy but you're not sure whether you would also like to study medicine at some point in the future, then studying pharmacy and deciding after the end of first year (a transfer) or at the end of your degree (applying for P/G medicine) sounds like the best option here. Bear in mind, you don't need to do prereq subjects if you accept an offer to Monash or Deakin, which are the other two Victorian PG med courses.

The UMAT has no bearing on how "risky" it will be for you to apply for postgraduate medicine

So even if I studied Pharmacy at Monash, I could transfer after first year into ..Biomedicine at UniMelb?
Also, I say it's risky because doesn't the GAMSAT test similar things to the UMAT? If I did so horribly on the UMAT, what are the chances of me doing well on the GAMSAT? That's what I'm saying, hahah.
2009:
Biology [34]   Vietnamese [36]
2010:
English [48]   Chemistry [37]   Further [38]   Methods [39]   Specialist [29]
2010 ATAR: 97.20
2011: Bachelor of Biomedicine @ UniMelb

98.40_for_sure

  • vtec's kickin in yo!
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2589
  • Respect: +10
Re: Biomedicine too risky ?
« Reply #6 on: December 06, 2010, 04:07:32 pm »
+1
I wouldnt get my hopes up about transferring INTO biomed at melb, that isnt easy. Taking advantage of the 88 seas req is once in a lifetime and foolish to pass up if you defs want med
2009: Texts & Traditions (28)
2010: English (45), Chemistry (40), Methods CAS (43), Specialist Maths (42)
ATAR: 98.40

Booksale: http://vce.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,33456.0.html
MM & SM tuition: http://vce.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,33942.0.html

Russ

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8442
  • Respect: +661
Re: Biomedicine too risky ?
« Reply #7 on: December 06, 2010, 04:09:41 pm »
0
You could apply to transfer into biomedicine, but it would be easier to transfer into a BSc. But yes, transferring is an option.

And there is minimal connection between the UMAT/GAMSAT. I know people with bad UMAT scores and good GAMSAT scores (and also the reverse)

mandy

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 844
  • Respect: +28
Re: Biomedicine too risky ?
« Reply #8 on: December 06, 2010, 04:16:04 pm »
0
I wouldnt get my hopes up about transferring INTO biomed at melb, that isnt easy. Taking advantage of the 88 seas req is once in a lifetime and foolish to pass up if you defs want med

Yeah I know, I just worry I won't do well enough in the GAMSAT to be accepted into any postgraduate medicine studies.

Does anyone know if the GAMSAT requirements for medicine at different universities are the same or different?
2009:
Biology [34]   Vietnamese [36]
2010:
English [48]   Chemistry [37]   Further [38]   Methods [39]   Specialist [29]
2010 ATAR: 97.20
2011: Bachelor of Biomedicine @ UniMelb

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Biomedicine too risky ?
« Reply #9 on: December 06, 2010, 04:17:42 pm »
0
I wouldnt get my hopes up about transferring INTO biomed at melb, that isnt easy. Taking advantage of the 88 seas req is once in a lifetime and foolish to pass up if you defs want med

Yeah I know, I just worry I won't do well enough in the GAMSAT to be accepted into any postgraduate medicine studies.

Does anyone know if the GAMSAT requirements for medicine at different universities are the same or different?

Interested in going interstate?
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

shinny

  • VN MVP 2010
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4327
  • Respect: +256
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Biomedicine too risky ?
« Reply #10 on: December 06, 2010, 04:20:10 pm »
0
I wouldnt get my hopes up about transferring INTO biomed at melb, that isnt easy. Taking advantage of the 88 seas req is once in a lifetime and foolish to pass up if you defs want med

Yeah I know, I just worry I won't do well enough in the GAMSAT to be accepted into any postgraduate medicine studies.

Does anyone know if the GAMSAT requirements for medicine at different universities are the same or different?

Of course they'd be different. As with all things, requirements vary with demand. The criteria on which graduate med is based varies between universities as well, meaning that the weighting of the GAMSAT can vary. For example, UQ doesn't have an interview, while the GPA required is more of a hurdle than anything, so the GAMSAT has a very large weighting. In your situation, I would go into Pharmacy and then do an anatomy course outside if you are aiming for UoM graduate Med, or skip the anatomy course if you don't mind applying interstate.
MBBS (hons) - Monash University

YR11 '07: Biology 49
YR12 '08: Chemistry 47; Spesh 41; Methods 49; Business Management 50; English 43

ENTER: 99.70


Russ

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8442
  • Respect: +661
Re: Biomedicine too risky ?
« Reply #11 on: December 06, 2010, 04:20:27 pm »
0
efb but i might as well point out that Deakin and Monash have (relatively) low requirements compared to interstate unis, so they're perfectly plausible options in Victoria

Varies dramatically. UQ has an extremely high GAMSAT cutoff because they don't have an interview process, so it attracts students with extremely high scores (and allegedly those with poor social skills who interview badly).

UoM had low cutoffs this year, it's expected to rise for future years.

98.40_for_sure

  • vtec's kickin in yo!
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2589
  • Respect: +10
Re: Biomedicine too risky ?
« Reply #12 on: December 06, 2010, 04:21:40 pm »
0
Which unis in aus are good for pg med?
2009: Texts & Traditions (28)
2010: English (45), Chemistry (40), Methods CAS (43), Specialist Maths (42)
ATAR: 98.40

Booksale: http://vce.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,33456.0.html
MM & SM tuition: http://vce.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,33942.0.html

mandy

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 844
  • Respect: +28
Re: Biomedicine too risky ?
« Reply #13 on: December 06, 2010, 04:21:48 pm »
0
I wouldnt get my hopes up about transferring INTO biomed at melb, that isnt easy. Taking advantage of the 88 seas req is once in a lifetime and foolish to pass up if you defs want med

Yeah I know, I just worry I won't do well enough in the GAMSAT to be accepted into any postgraduate medicine studies.

Does anyone know if the GAMSAT requirements for medicine at different universities are the same or different?

Interested in going interstate?

I haven't considered that yet, but are the requirements that much lower?
2009:
Biology [34]   Vietnamese [36]
2010:
English [48]   Chemistry [37]   Further [38]   Methods [39]   Specialist [29]
2010 ATAR: 97.20
2011: Bachelor of Biomedicine @ UniMelb

_henwee

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 281
  • Respect: +1
Re: Biomedicine too risky ?
« Reply #14 on: December 06, 2010, 04:22:42 pm »
0
There are other entry-to-practice options around if you don't get into unimelb MD after biomed/science.

Have you thought of medical radiations?
http://www.monash.edu/study/coursefinder/course/3889/
2 years full time, after your bachelors.

That's one of my backup options.