Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 22, 2025, 12:45:24 am

Author Topic: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?  (Read 51711 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

nickalaz

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 163
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #105 on: June 12, 2008, 02:49:07 pm »
well actually, i know somebody first hand that got
an A on the midyear, A on the end of year, got 39 raw
2007

melaniej

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 275
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #106 on: June 12, 2008, 02:49:38 pm »
could i just ask, the question that asked use a relevant gestalt principle. i picked similarity, so he could make them the same colour and then they would look alike or something along the lines of that.
was this correct? or was it only figure ground? because the question implied that there was more than 1 correct answer lol

Yeah aslong as you justified it well, then similarity could have been accepted.  I asked my teacher about that one afterwards.

I said figure ground though, as that is the principle that is involved with camoflauge..
but depending on how you explained your answer then it could have been right.

daniel99

  • Guest
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #107 on: June 12, 2008, 02:50:16 pm »
could i just ask, the question that asked use a relevant gestalt principle. i picked similarity, so he could make them the same colour and then they would look alike or something along the lines of that.
was this correct? or was it only figure ground? because the question implied that there was more than 1 correct answer lol

Similarity and figure ground will be accepted, as they could both work. I did similarity aswell.

sisqo1111

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 645
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #108 on: June 12, 2008, 02:50:46 pm »
i think i would have done ok lol

daniel99

  • Guest
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #109 on: June 12, 2008, 02:52:33 pm »
I didnt make reference to control and relevant questions, but i spoke about the increase in conductivity??? Will that be ohk or not full marks?

melaniej

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 275
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #110 on: June 12, 2008, 02:54:40 pm »
it depends how you said it?
I;m not sure if saying
"an increase in GSR would indicate he is lying" because thats not clearly specifying what the increase was in relation to.
It all depends on your explanation

sisqo1111

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 645
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #111 on: June 12, 2008, 02:56:20 pm »
does anyone remember the one about emma jane and krik. i wrote one factor would be age, cause i thought that past experience would not have been one.
i hope i was right. does anyone know this is right :(

sisqo1111

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 645
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #112 on: June 12, 2008, 02:57:42 pm »
I didnt make reference to control and relevant questions, but i spoke about the increase in conductivity??? Will that be ohk or not full marks?

thats what i said, but i think i explained it ok lol so hopefully full marks lol

melaniej

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 275
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #113 on: June 12, 2008, 03:00:00 pm »
does anyone remember the one about emma jane and krik. i wrote one factor would be age, cause i thought that past experience would not have been one.
i hope i was right. does anyone know this is right :(

I'm not sure about age:S

i know it could have accepted past exp. and context.
so say they saw the pic when they were in the company of either young women or old women would have been context,
and past experience, the girl could be young and have lots of young friends, thus exposed to many young women, increasing her likelihood of perceiving it in that particular way!

sisqo1111

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 645
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #114 on: June 12, 2008, 03:01:53 pm »
i was going to say that.
but i thought it was wrong :( cant i go back in time? lol

does anyone know if they will accept age?
« Last Edit: June 12, 2008, 03:03:30 pm by sisqo1111 »

melaniej

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 275
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #115 on: June 12, 2008, 03:04:29 pm »
i was going to say that.
but i thought it was wrong :( cant i go back in time? lol

haha yesss i wish i could go back in time as well! so i could study up a bit more on arousal!

sisqo1111

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 645
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #116 on: June 12, 2008, 03:07:06 pm »
hopefully they accept age as a factor lol.
i wrote as emma jane may have been young she would have seen it as a women and kirk to be old and see it as an old lady
haha
please let them except it haha

cathtacular

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 249
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #117 on: June 12, 2008, 03:10:42 pm »
i said it was past experience, but maybe my explanation talked about context and experience lol.

mannnnnnnn long wait till august.


i think they should have a room joined to each exam room with examiners ready to mark out papers and we get our marks in like an hour :) . in my dreams.
2008:
English
Art
Psychology
Legal studies
Vis Comm

sisqo1111

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 645
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #118 on: June 12, 2008, 03:11:58 pm »
yeah i was really confidant until i came on here :)

is it just me or has there been this sudden increase in people joining vce ntoes???

second that lol

Hughie

  • Guest
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #119 on: June 12, 2008, 03:52:15 pm »
question 15 of the multis about broca's what did everyone put?