Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

January 07, 2026, 03:40:15 pm

Author Topic: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?  (Read 55707 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

psychlaw

  • Guest
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #255 on: June 14, 2008, 06:29:07 pm »
r u serious... lol cool

psychlaw

  • Guest
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #256 on: June 14, 2008, 10:12:08 pm »
Did anyone else find the visual perception multis incredibly easy (apart from the one off Ames Room Q)

I think they really tried to tone it down this year cause of all the poor results in it from previous years......

j.el-halabi

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #257 on: June 14, 2008, 11:33:12 pm »
What did people right for the slanting of the floor of the Ame's room in the MC? I chose the one with "the floor doesn't slant but the ceiling does".
i think you're correct on that one buddy coz i went to visit the aimes room at the museum and the floor was fine but the roof was slanted

j.el-halabi

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #258 on: June 14, 2008, 11:53:14 pm »
For the Brocas question
So 100% the answer is slow and deliberate? Cause my teacher thinks otherwise, C.
i think your teacher is correct. Can anybody justify why it wouldn't be correct? They would stutter due to being unable to pronounce words properly, therefore having to try extra hard to pronounce words.

psychlaw

  • Guest
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #259 on: June 15, 2008, 12:12:03 am »
What did people right for the slanting of the floor of the Ame's room in the MC? I chose the one with "the floor doesn't slant but the ceiling does".
i think you're correct on that one buddy coz i went to visit the aimes room at the museum and the floor was fine but the roof was slanted
Lol the floor did slant in the museum, I went there too


j.el-halabi

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #260 on: June 15, 2008, 12:17:07 am »
Hey guys you know with that question about Kirk and Emma- Jane or whatever the names were, is it ok if i just say the ambiguous figure was perceived as being either an old or young lady due to their predisposition to ignore ceratin aspects of the stimulant and interpret what they wanted based on the context that the ambiguous figure was percieved in??? without giving all those examples that everybody gave about kirk coming from a retirement village and so on..?

psychlaw

  • Guest
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #261 on: June 15, 2008, 12:17:37 am »
For the Brocas question
So 100% the answer is slow and deliberate? Cause my teacher thinks otherwise, C.
i think your teacher is correct. Can anybody justify why it wouldn't be correct? They would stutter due to being unable to pronounce words properly, therefore having to try extra hard to pronounce words.

I don't think I need to justify the slow part, because everyone knows its slow. But for the deliberate part.


Book:
Psychology by Grivas, Carter, Down

Page 75, Blue Box 1 titled: Damage to Broca's area and effects on speech
Quote first sentence of 2nd paragraph: "Damage to Broca's area often produces speech that is very deliberate"

psychlaw

  • Guest
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #262 on: June 15, 2008, 12:19:34 am »
Hey guys you know with that question about Kirk and Emma- Jane or whatever the names were, is it ok if i just say the ambiguous figure was perceived as being either an old or young lady due to their predisposition to ignore ceratin aspects of the stimulant and interpret what they wanted based on the context that the ambiguous figure was percieved in??? without giving all those examples that everybody gave about kirk coming from a retirement village and so on..?
I don't think you would get full marks for that because you had to make up an example for there situation. You didn't explain how context was applied (IE - Was Kirk shown images of elderly people before he saw the ambiguous figure). So I doubt you'd get any marks for just that description.
But if you put context in the first part of that question, you'd get the mark for that

j.el-halabi

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #263 on: June 15, 2008, 12:31:52 am »
Hey guys you know with that question about Kirk and Emma- Jane or whatever the names were, is it ok if i just say the ambiguous figure was perceived as being either an old or young lady due to their predisposition to ignore ceratin aspects of the stimulant and interpret what they wanted based on the context that the ambiguous figure was percieved in??? without giving all those examples that everybody gave about kirk coming from a retirement village and so on..?
I don't think you would get full marks for that because you had to make up an example for there situation. You didn't explain how context was applied (IE - Was Kirk shown images of elderly people before he saw the ambiguous figure). So I doubt you'd get any marks for just that description.
But if you put context in the first part of that question, you'd get the mark for that
yeh i mentioned that Kirk and Emma were exposed to the ambigous figure in different contexts and i used the example of old ladies and young ladies respectively.. Oh well well just have to wait and see. Other than that pretty easy paper i say

ilovesuck

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 107
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #264 on: June 15, 2008, 12:36:45 am »
what was the answer to:

"blahblahblah ESB can be used to map motor/somatosensory cortex blahblah.  why isnt it used often today?"

psychlaw

  • Guest
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #265 on: June 15, 2008, 12:48:13 am »
Because it cannot be used on the healthy population, due to ethical purposes

Simpler terms: You wouldn't want someone slicing up your skull while your awake, and touching your open brain just for a few tests of where things are

But if someones already having surgery, or if they have brain damage, then it can be used

AppleThief

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 648
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #266 on: June 15, 2008, 09:22:23 am »
Because it cannot be used on the healthy population, due to ethical purposes

Simpler terms: You wouldn't want someone slicing up your skull while your awake, and touching your open brain just for a few tests of where things are

But if someones already having surgery, or if they have brain damage, then it can be used
Yeah, it's invasive, and there are now better methods for looking at brain function.

sisqo1111

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 645
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #267 on: June 15, 2008, 04:15:13 pm »
umm if i hopefully get the exam tomorrow and scan it in by tomorrow night, am i even allowed to? as in, am i breaking some sort of law? or is it ok?

moshi

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 282
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #268 on: June 15, 2008, 04:17:10 pm »
lol people have posted pages from the GAT up - if you don't want to post it on the site, maybe just send it via email to people who request it

sisqo1111

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 645
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #269 on: June 15, 2008, 04:19:20 pm »
i might do that,
i know Nick is desperate to see it lol!