Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 25, 2025, 05:39:39 pm

Author Topic: Ranks....  (Read 22024 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: Ranks....
« Reply #15 on: February 27, 2011, 11:00:20 pm »
0
When the marks are sent off, is it ranked in your class or in the whole school?
whole school, hence why they are "meant to" cross mark everything
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

Hodgeyhodgey

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 499
  • Respect: +35
  • School: Sebastopol Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Ranks....
« Reply #16 on: February 28, 2011, 06:50:08 am »
0
Is it normal for schools to base rankings on scores other than sacs? Because in further this year we just completed a sac on networks then straight afterwards we did another test to, as the teacher said "help with determining our rankings".
2010/11: Further Math|Accounting|BusMan|Englang|Economics|Physics [90.65]
2012-2014: Commerce @ Deakin

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: Ranks....
« Reply #17 on: February 28, 2011, 07:33:28 am »
0
Is it normal for schools to base rankings on scores other than sacs? Because in further this year we just completed a sac on networks then straight afterwards we did another test to, as the teacher said "help with determining our rankings".
Theoretically, they have to tell you know what will be counted and what won't be, hence why they call them SACs. But I suppose if there is a discrepancy between a few close marks, they could do it to differentiate?

As with this thread, everything and anything is possible...
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

nacho

  • The Thought Police
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2602
  • Respect: +418
Re: Ranks....
« Reply #18 on: February 28, 2011, 03:43:04 pm »
0
I definitely knew of some teachers 'cranking up' English SAC scores for people who they think 'deserved' it, or to even out scores. I think teachers/VCE coordinators also send off predictive study scores or something to VCAA.

I think they do that in my school too. I know a guy who got 100/100 for his SACs (from his school) and definitely believes his mark was bumped up.
You're talking about K.L yea? I remember him saying that.
I'm pretty sure this isn't a common case, like generally it's irrelevant in an awesome cohort between first 10 ranks anyway..
 and it's really easy to distinguish between good and bad students in a crap cohort.
OFFICIAL FORUM RULE #1:
TrueTears is my role model so find your own

2012: BCom/BSc @ Monash
[Majors: Finance, Actuarial Studies, Mathematical Statistics]
[Minors: Psychology/ Statistics]

"Baby, it's only micro when it's soft".
-Bill Gates

Upvote me

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: Ranks....
« Reply #19 on: February 28, 2011, 07:46:42 pm »
0
I definitely knew of some teachers 'cranking up' English SAC scores for people who they think 'deserved' it, or to even out scores. I think teachers/VCE coordinators also send off predictive study scores or something to VCAA.

I think they do that in my school too. I know a guy who got 100/100 for his SACs (from his school) and definitely believes his mark was bumped up.
You're talking about K.L yea? I remember him saying that.
I'm pretty sure this isn't a common case, like generally it's irrelevant in an awesome cohort between first 10 ranks anyway..
 and it's really easy to distinguish between good and bad students in a crap cohort.

He was one of the guys, (who would have got 100/100 scaled anyway), but I've heard  of another one from the same year. So shifty.

flash36

  • Guest
Re: Ranks....
« Reply #20 on: March 01, 2011, 02:01:24 pm »
0
My PE teacher never used to give us a percentage mark for our SACs, just a letter grade, which I thought was dodgy because the marks relative to grades could be varied so easily when sent away to VCAA.
« Last Edit: March 01, 2011, 04:35:12 pm by flash36 »

Ghost!

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 948
  • Year 12, What up.
  • Respect: +42
Re: Ranks....
« Reply #21 on: March 01, 2011, 04:31:47 pm »
0
My PE teacher never used to give us a percentage mark for our SACs, just a letter grade, which I thought was dodgy because the marks relatie to grades could be varied so easily when sent away to VCAA.

Yeah, I found out today that our English department is refusing to hand out actually marks on orals, just rough letter grades. Pretty frustrating.
2011 - English, English Language, Philosophy, Indonesian SL, Outdoor and Environmental Studies.

“We are all alone, born alone, die alone, we shall all someday look back on our lives and see that, in spite of our company, we were alone the whole way. I do not say lonely -- at least, not all the time -- but essentially, and finally, alone. This is what makes your self-respect so important, and I don't see how you can respect yourself if you must look in the hearts and minds of others for your happiness.”
― Hunter S. Thompson

lexitu

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2147
  • When I grow up I'm going to Bovine University.
  • Respect: +66
Re: Ranks....
« Reply #22 on: March 01, 2011, 04:55:08 pm »
0
URGE TO KILL RISING!

- (Pretty sure) predictive scores are only used for error checking in the case that a student scores significantly higher or lower than predicted.
- Students should have the right to know their exact scores and where they could improve.

m@tty

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4324
  • Respect: +33
  • School: Heatherton Christian College
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Ranks....
« Reply #23 on: March 01, 2011, 06:03:50 pm »
0
AFAIK, all that teachers provide as far as predictions are "indicative grades" for exams.
2009/2010: Mathematical Methods(non-CAS) ; Business Management | English ; Literature - Physics ; Chemistry - Specialist Mathematics ; MUEP Maths

96.85

2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering and Bachelor of Science, Monash University

2015-____: To infinity and beyond.

ReganM

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 227
  • What is being active?
  • Respect: +8
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Ranks....
« Reply #24 on: March 01, 2011, 09:55:00 pm »
0
AFAIK, all that teachers provide as far as predictions are "indicative grades" for exams.

Yup, I heard that those are used if the student say, is hospitalised on the way to the exam, you won't totally fail but they'll take into account what your teacher(s) thought you would get in the exam.
Graduated in 2011.

Bachelor of Science at Melbourne. Biological Science subjects.

golden

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1065
  • Sharpshot
  • Respect: +102
  • School: VSC
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Ranks....
« Reply #25 on: March 21, 2011, 05:05:43 pm »
0
Lets say if:
Rank 1 person (SACS) got 99% on their exam.
Rank 8 person (SACS) got 100% on their exam.

Who would get a higher study score?

What about:
Rank 1 person gets 0% (exam).
Rank 8 person gets 100% (exam).
Would that mean that the rank 8 person wouldn't be able to get a 50?
2014: Microbiology/Immunology Major.

Thanks to (alphabetical order):
2010: appianway. 2011: Kamil9876, laseredd, xZero. 2012: dc302, harper, marr.
Multiple times: pi, Russ, stonecold, TT.

Dr.Lecter

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 261
  • Respect: +16
Re: Ranks....
« Reply #26 on: March 21, 2011, 05:11:50 pm »
0
rank 1 would get higher, since we don't know what the 8th best exam score was
A census taker once tried to test me. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice Chianti.

Greatness

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3100
  • Respect: +103
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Ranks....
« Reply #27 on: March 21, 2011, 05:14:07 pm »
0
For the first situation id say the person ranked 1 would get the highest SS. And Rank 8s SS will depend on how well people ranked frmo 2-7 went.
The 2nd one is retarded lol not sure on what would happen. Id say that how the people ranked 2-7 went in the exams would have an influence on Rank 8s SS

werdna

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2857
  • Respect: +287
Re: Ranks....
« Reply #28 on: March 21, 2011, 05:25:13 pm »
0
When people say that the performance of others in the top ranks affects your study score, by how many points are you suggesting?

For example, I'm around rank 8/9 at the moment for BM in a really weak cohort. If I do really well on the exam, and the people higher than me in SACs get a lower exam score, what will my score look like? :S How will it have been affected by the others?

golden

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1065
  • Sharpshot
  • Respect: +102
  • School: VSC
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Ranks....
« Reply #29 on: March 22, 2011, 05:15:38 pm »
0
When people say that the performance of others in the top ranks affects your study score, by how many points are you suggesting?

For example, I'm around rank 8/9 at the moment for BM in a really weak cohort. If I do really well on the exam, and the people higher than me in SACs get a lower exam score, what will my score look like? :S How will it have been affected by the others?

I also want to know this.
2014: Microbiology/Immunology Major.

Thanks to (alphabetical order):
2010: appianway. 2011: Kamil9876, laseredd, xZero. 2012: dc302, harper, marr.
Multiple times: pi, Russ, stonecold, TT.