Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

July 05, 2025, 09:53:18 pm

Author Topic: pi's Specialist Maths Questions  (Read 23684 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: pi's Specialist Maths Questions
« Reply #60 on: July 05, 2011, 05:19:49 pm »
0
Thanks brightsky! :)

My crazy teacher will probably let me use them, he hates 'Australian standard' maths anyway ;D

mmonn1906

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 110
  • Respect: -2
Re: pi's Specialist Maths Questions
« Reply #61 on: July 05, 2011, 05:55:49 pm »
0
I am just scared I won't get a high score..

Andiio

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1209
  • Respect: +14
Re: pi's Specialist Maths Questions
« Reply #62 on: July 05, 2011, 06:23:25 pm »
0
I am just scared I won't get a high score..

Instead of thinking about the technicalities, focus on getting your basic foundations strong and sturdy. Then year 11/12 will be an absolute breeze.
2010: Chinese SL [43]
2011: English [47] | Mathematical Methods CAS [41]| Specialist Mathematics [38] | Chemistry [40] | Physics [37]
ATAR: 99.55

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: pi's Specialist Maths Questions
« Reply #63 on: July 15, 2011, 10:11:03 pm »
0
Just a couple of questions:

1.
This is from MathsQuest (:o), p. 264
Evaluate:
I got upto , which is only one step from the question, and am now stuck :(



2. (two parts)
(i)
This is more of a confusion. We have to find an antiderivative using .
I know, that by the formula sheet, that one antiderivative would be

But if we do . Isn't this also true?

Bit confused at what to write now if this pops up in the exam...

(ii)
AND, by extension, doesn't and mean that ?

^I know that is completely NOT TRUE, as is an established identity

Please VN, what have a done wrong? Because I am definitely wrong here :( :( :(


Thanks!




EDIT: fixed up 2 (ii) question, sooo stupid
« Last Edit: July 15, 2011, 10:38:57 pm by Rohitpi »

HenryP

  • Guest
Re: pi's Specialist Maths Questions
« Reply #64 on: July 15, 2011, 10:22:48 pm »
0
For question 1, its actually a typo. I spent half an hour trying to figure it out as well and realised it was a typo after reading the worked solutions. Cos is meant to be Tan. Then its simple enough to anti diff.
This is why I hate mathquest. Hope this helped.

moekamo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 275
  • Respect: +4
Re: pi's Specialist Maths Questions
« Reply #65 on: July 15, 2011, 10:24:36 pm »
+1
2.
i) you can do either, since arcsin(x) + arccos(x) = pi/2, you will just get a different + C depending on which one you choose

ii) your first line is wrong, , should be , then

Now you get then you will get that identity you said
2nd Year BSc/BEng @ Monash

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: pi's Specialist Maths Questions
« Reply #66 on: July 15, 2011, 10:32:08 pm »
0
For question 1, its actually a typo. I spent half an hour trying to figure it out as well and realised it was a typo after reading the worked solutions. Cos is meant to be Tan. Then its simple enough to anti diff.
This is why I hate mathquest. Hope this helped.

Thanks! I was like WTF!?!?! Combed the internet for a while, couldn't find any way to integrate that.

That makes it much easier, thanks!

2.
i) you can do either, since arcsin(x) + arccos(x) = pi/2, you will just get a different + C depending on which one you choose
OK, that's handy :)

2.
ii) your first line is wrong, , should be , then

Now you get then you will get that identity you said

Oh, that was stupid.
What I meant was and
So the 'relationship' I found would probably only work for one certain value of x (if even that). So its imperative that I include '+c's here to get to the identity.

Just as a clarification, in your last line, did you just put all the 'constants' to one side? As there would be one from the inverse sine one too?
« Last Edit: July 15, 2011, 10:36:44 pm by Rohitpi »

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: pi's Specialist Maths Questions
« Reply #67 on: July 15, 2011, 10:33:09 pm »
0
1) You may wanna check the solutions manual, they refer to sec^2(x)tan^n(x) rather than cos^n(x)...

2) And yeah, I've also wondered this, will be interested in the solution...

EDIT: Beaten.
« Last Edit: July 15, 2011, 10:34:42 pm by luken93 »
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

moekamo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 275
  • Respect: +4
Re: pi's Specialist Maths Questions
« Reply #68 on: July 15, 2011, 10:40:18 pm »
0
no, the relationship you got, -arcsin(x)=arccos(x) (or arcsin(x) + arccos(x)=0) never works, since arcsin(x) + arccos(x) = pi/2 works for any x between -1 and 1 (i.e. any x in the domain of each of these functions), so yes, the constant, + C must be included

and yea i chucked the constants on one side since im a bad-ass
2nd Year BSc/BEng @ Monash

tony3272

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 721
  • Hi
  • Respect: +25
  • School: Wantirna College
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: pi's Specialist Maths Questions
« Reply #69 on: July 15, 2011, 10:41:03 pm »
+1


2. (two parts)
(i)
This is more of a confusion. We have to find an antiderivative using .
I know, that by the formula sheet, that one antiderivative would be

But if we do . Isn't this also true?

Bit confused at what to write now if this pops up in the exam...


When i asked my teacher about this he said that by convention, if the negative is inside the integral you do cosine, and if it's outside you do sine. I doubt VCAA would take marks off for that tho.
2010 : Accounting
2011 : Methods (CAS) | Chemistry  | Physics  | English Language  | Specialist Maths

2012: BCom/BSc @ Monash!

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: pi's Specialist Maths Questions
« Reply #70 on: July 15, 2011, 10:41:59 pm »
0
no, the relationship you got, -arcsin(x)=arccos(x) (or arcsin(x) + arccos(x)=0) never works, since arcsin(x) + arccos(x) = pi/2 works for any x between -1 and 1 (i.e. any x in the domain of each of these functions), so yes, the constant, + C must be included

and yea i chucked the constants on one side since im a bad-ass

Ok, I get it now! Thanks a lot! :)


EDIT: Thanks for the further clarification tony on 2.(i) and luke on 1. :)

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: pi's Specialist Maths Questions
« Reply #71 on: July 15, 2011, 10:47:14 pm »
0
no, the relationship you got, -arcsin(x)=arccos(x) (or arcsin(x) + arccos(x)=0) never works, since arcsin(x) + arccos(x) = pi/2 works for any x between -1 and 1 (i.e. any x in the domain of each of these functions), so yes, the constant, + C must be included

and yea i chucked the constants on one side since im a bad-ass

Ok, I get it now! Thanks a lot! :)


EDIT: Thanks for the further clarification tony on 2.(i) and luke on 1. :)
hahaha, big help I am!
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: pi's Specialist Maths Questions
« Reply #72 on: July 18, 2011, 08:41:37 pm »
0
OK, more questions/queries!



1. More of a query
If we have , and the answer is , do we need to include the line: x is element of R\{0, -2} in the answer? The textbook seems to, and I wonder if its necessary.


2. More of a query
When do we have to have the modulus in the log when antidifferentiating functions? MQ seems to randomly remove it from some answers (eg. ). Bit confused here... :(


3. Help/query
Is there a proof that is fairly easy to understand for the Gaussian integral ? Even a link would be very helpful and much appreciated.



Thanks :)



(btw, to those who though MQ was easy, try Ex 5E, q4. part e, its a decent question :P )

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: pi's Specialist Maths Questions
« Reply #73 on: July 18, 2011, 08:46:15 pm »
+1
3. You won't understand it yet, but the integral is easily computed by converting to polar coordinates and using a double integral. If you want to see the working out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_integral#Careful_proof

i think this thread would be funner with the presence of some nt, combs ; )
« Last Edit: July 18, 2011, 08:48:38 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: pi's Specialist Maths Questions
« Reply #74 on: July 18, 2011, 09:00:18 pm »
0
3. You won't understand it yet, but the integral is easily computed by converting to polar coordinates and using a double integral. If you want to see the working out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_integral#Careful_proof

Hmmm, thought so. Maybe I'll have to pursue this later in life.

i think this thread would be funner with the presence of some nt, combs ; )

Noooooooooooooooooooooooo! Bad yr11 experience (damn poker!)