Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

July 24, 2025, 12:55:49 am

Author Topic: Gravimetric SAC tomorrow!(URGENT)  (Read 1780 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bozo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 392
  • Respect: +3
Gravimetric SAC tomorrow!(URGENT)
« on: March 16, 2011, 09:08:50 pm »
0
Its a gravimetric analysis finding the proportion of sulfate in a brand of commercial fertilizer.
BaCl2 is added after filterting etc, to form the precipitate. You guys get the gist of it.

I need to know;

Discuss the discrepancies between your % and manufacturers %.

Possible answers for if my percentage is


HIGHER and






LOWER



Thanks in Advance!

Water

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1136
  • Respect: +116
Re: Gravimetric SAC tomorrow!(URGENT)
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2011, 09:16:02 pm »
0
Higher:

- Not all of Water has not been dried up in the precipitate
- Did not remove the insolubles prior to Prac
- Weighing of sample (Our School, weighers are dodgy, so we have to remember, the weighing machine that we use, or else diff mass)


Lower
- Not enough precipitating agent
- Loss of sample during the process of the pract
- Heating of Reaction, when cooling, did not let it cool properly, which would allow for more precipitate (solubility is higher at higher temperatures )
About Philosophy

When I see a youth thus engaged,—the study appears to me to be in character, and becoming a man of liberal education, and him who neglects philosophy I regard as an inferior man, who will never aspire to anything great or noble. But if I see him continuing the study in later life, and not leaving off, I should like to beat him - Callicle

meli001

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 48
  • Respect: 0
Re: Gravimetric SAC tomorrow!(URGENT)
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2011, 09:24:40 pm »
0
Hi Bozo (LOL!)

I did the same SAC just two weeks ago, it's quite likely that you'll get a % lower than the manufacturer's claim but anyways, just in case ^^

Higher:
•The precipitate was not washed thoroughly (still traces of Cl- ions) leading there to be a higher % than the expected value. If I can remember correctly, you’re expected to test for chloride ions with AgNO3.
•The precipitate was not dried thoroughly and therefore there would be a higher % than the expected value.
•Residue not all filtered

Lower:
•Maximum amount of sulphate ions not obtained during diluting process
•Loss of precipitate whilst washing it
•Barium chloride was not added in excess (this is a really unlikely one seeing as the prac will give you a reasonable amount to ensure that it is in excess)
•Not all the precipitate was obtained


It's also quite important to note that the manufacturer's claim is mean % of the sulfate.

Good Luck!

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: Gravimetric SAC tomorrow!(URGENT)
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2011, 09:29:25 pm »
0
I also did this prac, everyone got a lower percentage.

If you are using a Buchner vacuum funnel to filter, then there will be the error that very small particles of BaSo4 will pass through the filter paper, hence decreasing measured mass and hence, calculated percentage.

When transferring solutions from one beaker to a measuring cylinder (for example), there will always be loss of sulfate ions, even after many washes, hence decreasing mass.

A systematic error in the weighing device could move your percentage either way (but will still be lower due to other more significant errors)

Bozo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 392
  • Respect: +3
Re: Gravimetric SAC tomorrow!(URGENT)
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2011, 09:38:02 pm »
0
If you are using a Buchner vacuum funnel to filter, then there will be the error that very small particles of BaSo4 will pass through the filter paper, hence decreasing measured mass and hence, calculated percentage.

Just on that, i didn't use filter paper in that step i actually used a crucible, would that matter.

And also would another reason BOTH ways be that the fertilizer is a non-homogeneous mixture meaning one sample of fertilizer can vary in SO4 ions to another sample.

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: Gravimetric SAC tomorrow!(URGENT)
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2011, 09:43:55 pm »
0
And also would another reason BOTH ways be that the fertilizer is a non-homogeneous mixture meaning one sample of fertilizer can vary in SO4 ions to another sample.

I should have mentioned that (as I wrote it in my prac report), my bad, forgot. But that is definitely a valid error.

Just on that, i didn't use filter paper in that step i actually used a crucible, would that matter.
I'm not sure on this one...

Bozo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 392
  • Respect: +3
Re: Gravimetric SAC tomorrow!(URGENT)
« Reply #6 on: March 16, 2011, 09:46:36 pm »
0
Last question i'm not to sure about, its something like this....

Fertilizer contains N P and K. This is in the form of (NH4)2SO4, Ca(H2PO4)2 and K2SO4. Could  other elements in this fertilizer be analysed by gravimetric analysis? If so, what solution would be added to carry out a precipitation reaction?

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: Gravimetric SAC tomorrow!(URGENT)
« Reply #7 on: March 16, 2011, 09:52:41 pm »
0
You could add Na2SO4 to precipitate the Ca 2+ ions?

Bozo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 392
  • Respect: +3
Re: Gravimetric SAC tomorrow!(URGENT)
« Reply #8 on: March 16, 2011, 09:54:30 pm »
0
I don't get it though, what am i supposed to do

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: Gravimetric SAC tomorrow!(URGENT)
« Reply #9 on: March 16, 2011, 10:03:18 pm »
0
Isolate Ca 2+ ions (in a similar way to the sulfate ions) and then precipitate it with sulfate ions from Na2SO4 solution (acts like BaCl2, with sulfate ions)

Although an ion other than sulfate would be better to use, but I just don't know my solubilities well enough...

EDIT: I'm not sure if you need to precipitate the N, P and K ions though... I don't know the solubilities for H2PO4
« Last Edit: March 16, 2011, 10:05:11 pm by Rohitpi »

Bozo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 392
  • Respect: +3
Re: Gravimetric SAC tomorrow!(URGENT)
« Reply #10 on: March 16, 2011, 10:09:41 pm »
0
BUT in the chem text book page 22 it says that only P can preciptate and be used for gravimetric analysis.

Bozo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 392
  • Respect: +3
Re: Gravimetric SAC tomorrow!(URGENT)
« Reply #11 on: March 16, 2011, 10:18:01 pm »
0
Wait can anyone clarify this,

So....
Ca(H2P04)2 can be analysed by gravimetric analysis because it forms a precipitate when combined with another reactant(BaCl2)

Blair1994

  • Guest
Re: Gravimetric SAC tomorrow!(URGENT)
« Reply #12 on: April 05, 2011, 06:21:35 pm »
0
Quote
And also would another reason BOTH ways be that the fertilizer is a non-homogeneous mixture meaning one sample of fertilizer can vary in SO4 ions to another sample.

how would you be able to minimise this?