Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

June 04, 2024, 10:31:48 pm

Author Topic: Special Relativity  (Read 2378 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: Special Relativity
« Reply #15 on: May 11, 2011, 08:01:26 pm »
0
Nice and simple

:o

lulz
Nice = I got it right (maybe? oh well comeatmebrah says it's right and I'm not going to check it again)
Simple = I completed it within my lifetime

If only my assignments had more nice simple problems

Thu Thu Train

  • Voted AN's sexiest member 2012
  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 667
  • <3
  • Respect: +336
Re: Special Relativity
« Reply #16 on: May 11, 2011, 08:12:49 pm »
0
Nice and simple

:o

lulz
Nice = I got it right (maybe? oh well comeatmebrah says it's right and I'm not going to check it again)
Simple = I completed it within my lifetime

If only my assignments had more nice simple problems

It looks similar to the answer I got (I used k-calculus though which makes it easier to work with)
        (
     '( '
    "'  //}
   ( ''"
   _||__ ____ ____ ____
  (o)___)}___}}___}}___}   
  'U'0 0  0 0  0 0  0 0    0 0
BBSN14

i actually almost wish i was a monash student.

Asx4Life

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 196
  • Respect: +10
Re: Special Relativity
« Reply #17 on: May 11, 2011, 11:45:29 pm »
0
I have a question:

A star measures a second star to be moving away at speed v = 0.85c, measured
in light-meters. The second star measures a third to be receding in the same
direction at 0.85c. Similarly, the third measures a fourth, and so on, up to some
large number n of stars. What is the velocity of the nth star relative to the first? 
Give an exact answer and an approximation useful for large n.

Suppose the nth star moves at velocity relative to the first planet, and the nth star moves at velocity relative to the (n-1)th star. Then we can apply lorentz boosts to transform the 4-velocity of the th star from the frame of the first star into the frame of the star. (for )







In our case, , so



Let's try to find an explicit expression for ... Because because!



Then



In other words,



Solving for we get:

     ,       .


Nice and simple

CORRECT.
I have a question:

A star measures a second star to be moving away at speed v = 0.85c, measured
in light-meters. The second star measures a third to be receding in the same
direction at 0.85c. Similarly, the third measures a fourth, and so on, up to some
large number n of stars. What is the velocity of the nth star relative to the first? 
Give an exact answer and an approximation useful for large n.

Suppose the nth star moves at velocity relative to the first planet, and the nth star moves at velocity relative to the (n-1)th star. Then we can apply lorentz boosts to transform the 4-velocity of the th star from the frame of the first star into the frame of the star. (for )







In our case, , so



Let's try to find an explicit expression for ... Because because!



Then



In other words,



Solving for we get:

     ,       .


Nice and simple

WTF LOL

schnappy

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 569
  • Respect: +7
Re: Special Relativity
« Reply #18 on: May 12, 2011, 12:03:26 am »
0
Matrices. Urgh.