Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 29, 2025, 08:09:11 am

Author Topic: integrating by parts  (Read 1950 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

berryy

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 118
  • Respect: +1
integrating by parts
« on: June 01, 2011, 07:25:50 pm »
0
can someone please show me how to solve for q via integrating by parts for:

dq/dt +10q = .25sin5t

i keep getting my constants wrong but when i do it exponetially it works,

Thanks all
class of 2010!


moekamo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 275
  • Respect: +4
Re: integrating by parts
« Reply #1 on: June 01, 2011, 08:06:14 pm »
0
im pretty sure you cant do that with integration by parts...

you can do it though, first find the solution to the homogeneous equation:

- this is seperable, and should be easy ()

then for the particular solution, you take a guess that


finding and subbing back in, then solving for A, B gives the particular solution ()

so the overall, general solution is:

« Last Edit: June 01, 2011, 08:07:58 pm by moekamo »
2nd Year BSc/BEng @ Monash

jimmy999

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 635
  • Respect: +5
Re: integrating by parts
« Reply #2 on: June 01, 2011, 09:04:05 pm »
0
You can also do that question using an integration factor. I'm pretty sure by using that method you'll then have to use integration by parts. I won't actually go into it, but a hint, you'll have to use integration by parts twice and collect the common factors
Religion and Society (38), IT - Software Development (45) English (35), Chemistry (49), Methods CAS (48), Specialist Maths (50)
ENTER: 99.15

2010 - Bachelor of Science(Maths)/Engineering(Chemical) - Monash Clayton

berryy

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 118
  • Respect: +1
Re: integrating by parts
« Reply #3 on: June 01, 2011, 09:30:37 pm »
0
You can also do that question using an integration factor. I'm pretty sure by using that method you'll then have to use integration by parts. I won't actually go into it, but a hint, you'll have to use integration by parts twice and collect the common factors

yeah thats what i meant!
when i integrated it twice, ive stuffed something up when i rearranged the "I" cos my constants are not 1/50 or 1/100
class of 2010!


moekamo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 275
  • Respect: +4
Re: integrating by parts
« Reply #4 on: June 02, 2011, 11:53:16 am »
0
ahh, ok, in that case , heres what happened when i did it:



which is the same as before, hope this helps find your mistake :)
2nd Year BSc/BEng @ Monash

berryy

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 118
  • Respect: +1
Re: integrating by parts
« Reply #5 on: June 03, 2011, 04:41:12 pm »
0
i know where i did wrong now
Thankyou heaps for the help :)
class of 2010!