They will remove hard caps on places eventually.
I'm not sure much past there to be honest.
I'm think there would be a lot of little footnotes and things here and there.
If they removed the cap, why would they need to set an atar limit?
This would really screw over certain programs at certain unis (rmit,swinburne,VU) because if they can do Bsc at melbourne or monash, why do it there?
I think there still is going to be some kind of control.
Also, consider, a uni can only carry so many students. There can only be so many tutorial rooms or 1st year chemistry labs, ect available at one time.
The 2nd post here might be worth a read -
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1307614I think they're just moving to a model where the funding follows the student to make the funding more fair for universities.
Like at monash they told us at the start of the year, they were slightly over-enrolled the guy was like "We hope the government decides to pay for you all.....". If funding followed every student, that really wouldn't be a problem.
I don't think abolishing entry requirements would do much good though. I mean sure people who did really bad in highschool could make a huge turn around but most of the time they'll just continue their old habbits (We are all a little guilty of this) and crumble if the course is too hard or just pass. If you want the university to have a quality, prestigious name, you can't let a lot students who don't know their stuff graduate. Employers will notice...
It kind of cheapens a monash degree or a melbourne degree if they let anyone in or almost everyone has one. I think they'll still create some kind of mechanism to control who goes where.