Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 14, 2026, 09:36:58 pm

Author Topic: So, how did y'all go on UMAT 08??????  (Read 22913 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bilgia

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 410
So, how did y'all go on UMAT 08??????
« on: July 30, 2008, 01:14:47 pm »
For the people who have just sat this years umat, what are your opinions?

For me,
Section 1: Was pretty long winded with many deduction questions, it was a killer for me....I had lot of questions to go, i think like 13 when the announcer said 10mins....i managed to only get 5 more when time ended..just guessed the rest. This is my second time sitting the umat,...oh shit i hope i did better than last year.

Section 2: Was much easier on the brain, but there were some tricky questions with similar emotions...i think i went decent on it, but i really cant tell.

Section 3: This was a winner for me, i managed to figure out patterns quite easily and there were maybe 2-3 hard questions which i think i weeded out before time ended.

My Subjects:
2006 I.T Systems --> 42
2007 English --> 40
         Methods --> 41
         Spec --> 38
         Chem --> 36
         Physics --> 37
         Unimaths --> 5.5

ENTER: 97.35


                   



 

chid

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 213
Re: So, how did y'all go on UMAT 08??????
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2008, 01:54:58 pm »
It was okay overall,

Section 1: I was disappointed with the way I handled the time pressure in this section. I guessed a number of questions.
Section 2: Felt okay, but there were a lot of 'close' 50-50 answers.
Section 3: I found this okay. But there were still some harder ones.

bilgia I thought that people doing an undergraduate course already couldn't sit the UMAT. So can you still enter undergraduate health science courses if you're already at uni then?
« Last Edit: July 30, 2008, 01:58:27 pm by chid »
VCE 2008:
English 49                        Physics 45
Specialist Maths 47           Economics 44  
Maths Mathods CAS 50     (2007) Chemistry 46

Aggregate 208.8
ENTER 99.90

Tutoring Methods, Specialist and Chemistry in 2009!
PM me if interested.

username

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 763
  • !
Re: So, how did y'all go on UMAT 08??????
« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2008, 01:56:01 pm »
I thought the puzzles for section three were incredibly hard, but then again, I always do. Section 1 and 2 were okay, but I agree, section 1 was too long.

beezy4eva

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 346
Re: So, how did y'all go on UMAT 08??????
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2008, 02:01:10 pm »
Section 2 & 3 were easy.
I screwed up section one, didnt have enough time. Had to just put bs for the last 6 or 7.
2008 ENTER: 98.10
Biology 50, Chemistry 45, Mathematical Methods *, Specialist Mathematics *, Further Mathematics(2007) 46

“DNA transcription takes place through an advanced process of magic.”
~ Harry Potter on Biology

“WHO THE HELL PUT THE TRAIN STATION 2000 KM AWAY FROM MELTON'S REMNANTS OF CIVILIZATION??????!!!!”
~ V-Line Commuter on Melton Railway Station

orangez

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 89
Re: So, how did y'all go on UMAT 08??????
« Reply #4 on: July 30, 2008, 03:15:17 pm »
Section 1 was definitely long-winded -- couldn't finish the last 5 and ended up guessing them (I was so tempted to go back to this section  :D).

Section 2 was much better.

Section 3: I hate the ones where you have to find the correct order and select the middle one. It's so freaking hard *I'm wondering how my tutor got 100% on it* Otherwise, the rest weren't too hard.
2007: Biology - 37
2008: English -36 , Specialist Maths - 38, Maths Methods - 42, Chemistry - 36, Physics - 40

ENTER: 96.30

ed_saifa

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 911
Re: So, how did y'all go on UMAT 08??????
« Reply #5 on: July 30, 2008, 03:20:25 pm »
All of it was so hard
[IMG]http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/2506/avatarcg3.png[/img]
(\ /)
(0.o)
(><)
/_|_\

"It's not a community effort"
"It's not allowed. Only death is a valid excuse"
"Probably for the first time time this year I was totally flabbergasted by some of the 'absolute junk' I had to correct .... I was going to use 'crap' but that was too kind a word"
"How can you expect to do well when
-you draw a lemon as having two half-cells connected with a salt bridge
-your lemons come with Cu2+ ions built in" - Dwyer
"Why'd you score so bad?!" - Zotos
"Your arguments are seri

iamdan08

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 697
  • VCE Survivor
Re: So, how did y'all go on UMAT 08??????
« Reply #6 on: July 30, 2008, 03:25:58 pm »
Section 1: Long and hard

Section 2: Ok, finished with plenty of time, but i was the same as chid, getting quite a few answers down to 2 options. Felt the answers were fairly ambiguous.

Section 3: Really good! Finished with time to spare. Happy.

Overall, i think its kind of hard to say how i went, as your score depends on so many variables (apparrently). Guess i will just have to wait and see.
2007-08 VCE - Accounting, Texts & Traditions, Methods, Chem, Physics, Lit
         
2011 Bachelor of Biomedicine (Completed) @ The University of Melbourne
2012 Doctor of Medicine (Second Year) @ The University of Melbourne

andrew.tran

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: So, how did y'all go on UMAT 08??????
« Reply #7 on: July 30, 2008, 03:58:11 pm »
section 1: PWNED IT, suprisingly, lucky i didnt have to read half the stimulus (info) material coz i got background knowledge. So it was straight to the questions for me.

SECTION 2: wat the hell do half of the words mean, pretty average.

SEction 3: not bad.
got 40 raw score methods last year........grrrrrrrr.

this years aims: physics 45+, specialist 45+, chemistry, 43+, biology, 43+, english 40+. :P.

Should listen in class instead of hangman and noughts and crosses XD.

Toothpaste

  • pseudospastic
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1648
  • Member #10
Re: So, how did y'all go on UMAT 08??????
« Reply #8 on: July 30, 2008, 04:14:33 pm »
Section 1: Was pretty long winded with many deduction questions, it was a killer for me....I had lot of questions to go, i think like 13 when the announcer said 10mins....i managed to only get 5 more when time ended..just guessed the rest. This is my second time sitting the umat,...oh shit i hope i did better than last year.
Section 2 & 3 were easy.
I screwed up section one, didnt have enough time. Had to just put bs for the last 6 or 7.
Section 1 was definitely long-winded -- couldn't finish the last 5 and ended up guessing them (I was so tempted to go back to this section  :D).
ditto all  :(  I guessed heaps from section one due to the time restraints.

In 2 and 3 I had time left over (and had the biggest urge to go back to section one lol, but I followed the rules ;D) ... but can't be so sure about my answers.

Hope everyone's relieved :)

beezy4eva

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 346
Re: So, how did y'all go on UMAT 08??????
« Reply #9 on: July 30, 2008, 04:37:58 pm »
Section 3: I hate the ones where you have to find the correct order and select the middle one. It's so freaking hard *I'm wondering how my tutor got 100% on it* Otherwise, the rest weren't too hard.
Advice a bit too late, but for the easier ones there was usually two the same. One is the first and the other is the last.
2008 ENTER: 98.10
Biology 50, Chemistry 45, Mathematical Methods *, Specialist Mathematics *, Further Mathematics(2007) 46

“DNA transcription takes place through an advanced process of magic.”
~ Harry Potter on Biology

“WHO THE HELL PUT THE TRAIN STATION 2000 KM AWAY FROM MELTON'S REMNANTS OF CIVILIZATION??????!!!!”
~ V-Line Commuter on Melton Railway Station

merlin

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 220
Re: So, how did y'all go on UMAT 08??????
« Reply #10 on: July 30, 2008, 05:17:23 pm »
Yeh, have to agree, Section 1 for was pretty bad, ended up guessing the last few questions, whilst section 2 and 3 were pretty good

merlin

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 220
Re: So, how did y'all go on UMAT 08??????
« Reply #11 on: July 30, 2008, 05:18:43 pm »
So now I want to know how are our scores are calculated, in terms of percentile...etc?

Toothpaste

  • pseudospastic
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1648
  • Member #10
Re: So, how did y'all go on UMAT 08??????
« Reply #12 on: July 30, 2008, 06:05:22 pm »
So now I want to know how are our scores are calculated, in terms of percentile...etc?

I don't think anyone knows how they're calculated .. it's all hush hush with the UMAT. ACER doesn't reveal anything about the marking system.

EDIT: re-read your post. You get percentile, overall score and er.. what was the other one..?

polky

  • 2008 VN Dux
  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 434
Re: So, how did y'all go on UMAT 08??????
« Reply #13 on: July 30, 2008, 06:51:38 pm »
Section 3: I hate the ones where you have to find the correct order and select the middle one. It's so freaking hard *I'm wondering how my tutor got 100% on it* Otherwise, the rest weren't too hard.
Advice a bit too late, but for the easier ones there was usually two the same. One is the first and the other is the last.

THAT IS MY TACTIC TOO LOL.

I don't know, sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't.  *shrugs*

My experience was like the rest.  Section 1 - was very pressed for time and ended up guessing quite a few.  Sections 2 and 3 were relatively easier and I had time left over.

Overall though I don't think I did that well, especially for Section 1!
ENTER 99.95
2008 50 English   49 Chemistry   43 Specialist   45 History:Revs
2007 46 Biology   42 Methods
2006 45 Chinese SL


Glockmeister

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1660
  • RIP Sweet Nothings.
Re: So, how did y'all go on UMAT 08??????
« Reply #14 on: July 30, 2008, 07:24:02 pm »
Funny, I seem to feel the same way about each of the sections of the UMAT as most of you. Section 1 was a killer.

Results come out in September yeah?
"this post is more confusing than actual chemistry.... =S" - Mao

[22:07] <robbo> i luv u Glockmeister

<Glockmeister> like the people who like do well academically
<Glockmeister> tend to deny they actually do well
<%Neobeo> sounds like Ahmad0
<@Ahmad0> no
<@Ahmad0> sounds like Neobeo

2007: Mathematical Methods 37; Psychology 38
2008: English 33; Specialist Maths 32 ; Chemistry 38; IT: Applications 42
2009: Bachelor of Behavioural Neuroscience, Monash University.