a man for all seasons.
question "the play demonstrates that in the end every man has his price, do you agree?"
wondering about ideas to tackle this, so far i have got:
the argument between rich and more about Machiavelli proposition that every man does have his price, rich agrees yet more doesnt.
Rich's ultimate price is when he become attorney general for wales.
more doesn't believe his price was high enough " it profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world ...but for wales!" more believes riches price is his soul.
i think mores price, is his families safety and the chance to die for his belief
the conversation at the pub between rich and cromwell "it would depend on what i was offered"
everyone in the play makes compromises for their price. wolsey, crammer, norfolk, henry and alice do this... some of these people however, actually believe that the good of the state comes before their religion...
i really dont like this text but any ideas on this would be greatly appreciated.
Home
Help
Search
Login
